Jump to content

DIC MPG Glitch?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Found an odd glitch (odd to me at least) this weekend.  When I was looking at the 400 mile MPG on the DIC (as I was approaching 400 miles on my tank), I was seeing 22.1 MPG.  When I scrolled up to the trip meter, those same 400 miles since my last fill up were showing 22.6 MPG.  I would think a tenth or two falls into a margin of error, but a .5 difference seems large to me.  The pictures were taken less than 30 seconds apart (within the same mile as you can see).

 

Do you think there are any other reasons it would be so off?  I realize it is only 2% or 3%, but it just seems like a lot to me.  There are probably a multitude of reasons why, but I would think that GM would have had these values synced some way.

 

Either way, not complaining at all with either 22.1 or 22.6, I just found the discrepancy interesting.

400 Mile Average.jpg

Trip Meter.jpg

Posted

If you want accurate miles per gallon, calculate it by hand.  Some DIC's has been known to be overoptimistic.  Some say the General wants everyone to feel warm and fuzzy that they are getting better fuel mileage than they are.  Others say they calibrate each year for one transmission/rear gear/tire type and size for each engine and then put that in each truck off the line, so a High Country with highway tires and economy gear gets the same DIC calibration as a TrailBoss with off-road tires and a towing gear.  Mine has been at least 7-10% overoptimistic on gallons used and MPG since new.  And the dealer can't recalibrate it.  

Posted
44 minutes ago, Chris Callanan said:

I would say the bigger problem is you taking pictures while  you are driving :)

For some as yet unknown reason some don't see that as a problem, Darwins kids?

Could also just be a Floridain thing...

 

Posted

I have yet to see anyone explain exactly how the DIC calculation works. It seems to take a bunch of instantaneous readings and average them. I don't believe it is actually measuring the total fuel burned and dividing by total miles driven, which would be the only accurate way.

 

Pretty much every discussion about the DIC fuel economy leads to an agreement that the DIC readings are too optimistic. In my experience they are fairly close, usually 0.25 - 0.5 mpg higher than hand calc. (which would mean its within 3%)

 

Short story, don't worry about the 0.5 difference between the screens. Hand calculate it if you really want to know your fuel economy long-term.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • After my recent rear end bumper damage, body shop has made the repairs and included a new OEM receiver hitch.  I started thinking about how it was tightened...to specs or by hand or ??.  I called the body shop and asked and they said it was tightened by an impact gun.  I said I wanted it tightened to OEM specs.  They said no problem, bring it to shop today and they will torque to specs, which they say is 74 ft/lbs.   A couple of questions,,,,   1.  Should new bolts have been used?  If so, how many are there (bill shows one and four (I assume different areas of receiver).   2.,  Since they torqued with impact gun and now are going to probably loosen and then torque to spces, will that damage/stretch the bolts?   3.  If old bolts were reused (truck has 9000 miles), is that a problem?   4.  Any other things iI may have missed with regard to receiver replacement?   Thanks!
    • Is this supposed to be in English?  "close to 100 fake, new brake pads sign on the dash board"     Pull the wheels off.  Check the brake pad thickness.  Check the sensors out.  You could have good pads and the sensors aren't in to the worn out position, but have an electrical fault with the sensor or the plug wiring to the sensor.   
    • Gas or diesel???????????   You did not indicate.  Your topic just says "2022 10L80".      
    • Tomorrow I go in for my third joint replacement in jus a little over a year year!  I am not worried about the surgery but I am a little annoyed about going through the recovery process again!  I keep my frustrations to myself as I do appreciate that I am truly lucky.  Knee, hip, and shoulder replacements are routine, safe and improve mobility.  The next couple of days will be slow but every day following will see steady improvement in my mobility.  
    • Practical Application ISO 4406   I think this oil cleanliness thing is going to boil down to ones personal resolve. The information is there but applying it I believe will test your commitment to the machine. Implementation would involve building or buying a prefilter or purchase of an "ISOCLEAN" oil. Then installing a single digit micron bypass system. A good deal of testing and about 99.9% of you are saying at that point....yea.....not my cuppa tea. So what can you do?    You already did the first step. Get educated and leave the bias at the door. Be aware of the its, cleanliness, importance.    Do your own work if you can. Keep the equipment clean. Not just your funnel but the engine bay. Use sealed containers. Think it through.    I believe you will find, as I did, that the tightest absolute full flow filters (Beta 200) will be around 20 micron. That will yield on average a Beta 75 of 10-15 micron. They are few in number by brand and price point. Loose filters are a dime a dozen and even the best brands have lines of loose filters. Some cleverly marketed as "Extended Service". Others will market flow over efficiency. But I think the take away once informed is that the extra cost of the best offered is a bargain. There are cheaper filters with good efficiency that are equal in performance to niche brands with big prices. Your Quick Lube is about a 40 micron unit. This is where your dealer is a plus. the AC-Delco filter is a good step up from those places. Even better if you specify the UPF line.    Be skeptical of marketing. Buying an oil that is made from GTL advertised as the cleanest base oil is using a truth to support a lie. While GTL's are made from debris free gas the processing equipment and post handling is just like any other oil. It also ignores the fact that PAO's and Esters are also gas in origin. Any private prescreening testing you would do, and some have done, would yield a result only good for the batch you tested. AMSOIL and Schaeffer's have built a reputation for paying attention to this detail.    Context. Cold starts account for at least 75%, or more, of an engines wear. But of the remaining 25% ish, over 80% is caused by particle count. Now where do we find high milage motors that use this type of information efficiently? OTR trucking!      Now, anyone want to build a prefilter or off line cleaning system anyway?   
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...