Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Demand dictates what they will build.  They save money by having standard features in various trims vs ala carte. 

Posted
Lets be real, if the demand was there they would build it.  Good friend has been a GMC salesman and asst manager for over 30 yrs and I talked to him a while back about how you don't see the short box reg cab anymore. He says, they don't sell.  Very few are going to pay $40k for one when they can get a cc or dc for darn near the same price and better resale value.  Said they had one 2020 model and it sat for 10 months and not one serious customer.  They finally sold it to a local road commission based solely on the lowest price truck they purchase for their construction density inspector.   They did not even order the truck for stock, GMC forced them to take one (among other less popular reg cabs) to get more allocation for hot sellers like CC's and Denali's. 
 
PS-rumors are they are pulling the plug on the Camaro after the 2022 model year due to declining sales. The Impala is gone for the same reason, they don't sell enough to make a profit.  GM is beholding to shareholders to make money.


GM has said Camaro will be done in 2023


Ryan B.
  • Sad 1
Posted

full disclosure- I think RCSB full size trucks look cool.  But we live in a different day and age now.  And THAT SUCKS that the Camaro is being discontinued :(  (again) But what can you do, there are now turbocharged 4 cylinder engines that are just as fast as the V8s and the younger gen are not for the muscle cars. 

Posted

GM got rid of large rear drive cars to convert the plant to making P/Us. More profits. The impala was popular at the time. Especially in fleet sales. People were convinced to buy the boxes with a hole in the back. The big three went laughing to the bank.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Sadly more than likely gone for ever in american market . GM has convinced 98.9 % of population they do not want them. Four full doors dripping with all the candy inside and out. Keep the bed short so I can park it at store or mall. Big tires and a lift will make me feel much better too. Thank you GM marketing team I was in such turmoil about truck until you gave me some therapy. Now that my head is on straight i will take that Denali....

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
Sadly more than likely gone for ever in american market . GM has convinced 98.9 % of population they do not want them. Four full doors dripping with all the candy inside and out. Keep the bed short so I can park it at store or mall. Big tires and a lift will make me feel much better too. Thank you GM marketing team I was in such turmoil about truck until you gave me some therapy. Now that my head is on straight i will take that Denali....
 
 

Me I’d buy a big 4 door rear drive car that’s a great cruiser gets good gas mileage. Doesn’t wonder all over the road when it’s windy or passing a semi. And have enough money leftover to buy a nice used truck with the money I saved. Like in my sig. And I did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

cant get a 2 door tahoe   or a full frame v8 2 door rear wheel drive coupe or a rcsb chevy ..they all went the way of the unicycle

Posted
12 hours ago, KARNUT said:

GM got rid of large rear drive cars to convert the plant to making P/Us. More profits. The impala was popular at the time. Especially in fleet sales. People were convinced to buy the boxes with a hole in the back. The big three went laughing to the bank.
 

Actually, by 1996 when the Caprice/Impala SS, Roadmaster, Fleetwood, and Cutlass Cruiser were discontinued in order to convert the Arlington, TX plant over to build SUVs/Trucks, sales were extremely low. 

 

1996 Production:

Caprice-  46,261  (90% law enforcement)

Impala SS- 41,941 (Very impressive jump from only 20,000 or so the year before, in 1995)

Fleetwood-  10,200

Custom Cruiser-  Discontinued after 1992 which sold only 4300 (These were station wagons)

Roadmaster- 22,989

 

Production Numbers of the Impala starting in 2000

   
2000        174,358
2001 208,395
2002 198,918
2003 267,882
2004 290,259
2005 246,481
2006 289,868 (Change over to 9th Generation)
2007 311,128
2008 265,840
2009 165,565
2010 172,078
2011 171,434
2012 169,351
2013 156,797
2014 140,280 (Change over to 10th Generation)
2015 116,825
2016 97,006
2017 75,877
2018 56,556
2019 44,978

 

What sucks is that the plant where the newer Impala was made, the Oshawa Car Assembly Plant was world class and won many awards.  And GM had the guts to shut it down and convert it.  What a damn shame.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oshawa_Car_Assembly

 

 

 

Posted
Actually, by 1996 when the Caprice/Impala SS, Roadmaster, Fleetwood, and Cutlass Cruiser were discontinued in order to convert the Arlington, TX plant over to build SUVs/Trucks, sales were extremely low. 
 
1996 Production:
Caprice-  46,261  (90% law enforcement)
Impala SS- 41,941 (Very impressive jump from only 20,000 or so the year before, in 1995)
Fleetwood-  10,200
Custom Cruiser-  Discontinued after 1992 which sold only 4300 (These were station wagons)
Roadmaster- 22,989
 
Production Numbers of the Impala starting in 2000
   
2000        174,358
2001 208,395
2002 198,918
2003 267,882
2004 290,259
2005 246,481
2006 289,868 (Change over to 9th Generation)
2007 311,128
2008 265,840
2009 165,565
2010 172,078
2011 171,434
2012 169,351
2013 156,797
2014 140,280 (Change over to 10th Generation)
2015 116,825
2016 97,006
2017 75,877
2018 56,556
2019 44,978
 
What sucks is that the plant where the newer Impala was made, the Oshawa Car Assembly Plant was world class and won many awards.  And GM had the guts to shut it down and convert it.  What a damn shame.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oshawa_Car_Assembly
 
 
 

The front drive didn’t excite me either. But as you stated when they made the rear drive exciting sales went up. I bought one. Truth is pickups make them more money. I bought a 94 impala ss and a Z28. That’s when cars became exciting and perform again. The 80s thru the 90s the big three was losing sales to foreign makes. They focus on trucks and SUVs. They had no foreign competition. And let rear drive sedans slide.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

I get if sales are down on a particular vehicle, whether it’s because GM wants them down or not, and it gets canned. But the fact is that RCSB trucks are being sold overseas, so why not just leave some off the boat and sell them here.  If GM rebates the RCSB trucks as much as they do the other configurations it would probably sell. Like I stated earlier, a few years ago an extended/double cab truck that stickered about 7k more than a RCSB actually sold for less than a RCSB due to the rebates on a double/extended and a lack of rebates on a RCSB.  

Posted
I get if sales are down on a particular vehicle, whether it’s because GM wants them down or not, and it gets canned. But the fact is that RCSB trucks are being sold overseas, so why not just leave some off the boat and sell them here.  If GM rebates the RCSB trucks as much as they do the other configurations it would probably sell. Like I stated earlier, a few years ago an extended/double cab truck that stickered about 7k more than a RCSB actually sold for less than a RCSB due to the rebates on a double/extended and a lack of rebates on a RCSB.  

I was a fan of the extended cab. Up to my 2014 that’s what I bought for work. I did have a couple of single cabs. My last one was a Ram. It was fun.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, SILVER SLED said:

 Like I stated earlier, a few years ago an extended/double cab truck that stickered about 7k more than a RCSB actually sold for less than a RCSB due to the rebates on a double/extended and a lack of rebates on a RCSB.  

And there you have it. A plan to sink your own ship and blame the customer.

 :mad:

 

When the 10th gen Impala was designed they took away EVERYTHING an Impala was

And sales sagged. Really?

 

This car use to be a 6 passenger family car that was turned into a 4 seater with four doors and the interior space of a Neon coupe. Car is a joke,,er was...

 

Downsize cars then make SUV's and Pickups busses

Confusing

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • 2 months later...
Posted

Pretty soon the only 1/2 ton truck GM will build is a CCSB. Once they got rid of the RCSB, GM started limiting the Double cab options, no more LTZ, LT Trail Boss, AT4 or SLT in a double cab. Give it a few years and it'll be gone too. 

 

Posted
22 minutes ago, Daly said:

Pretty soon the only 1/2 ton truck GM will build is a CCSB. Once they got rid of the RCSB, GM started limiting the Double cab options, no more LTZ, LT Trail Boss, AT4 or SLT in a double cab. Give it a few years and it'll be gone too. 

 

Which means I'll be keeping my heavily optioned double cab AT4 for a long time...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...