Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
What difference does China make right now?  We need to be worried about saving American lives not pointing fingers at China.
 
By mid-January we had it in this country.  It took two months from there before Trump took it seriously.  Our own American leadership is failing us when we need it most and you're worried about CHINA?  Please.  We need to stop trying to save face ourselves first.  Be part of the solution.

He took it seriously far sooner than anyone else. Much to the abuse of the media and the left. Make no mistake China new how bad it was. They disappeared several of their doctors trying to warn the world about it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
7 minutes ago, The Zip said:

Deverado - I read this differently.  I read it as US need to handle our business

Exactly!  Don't turn the comment into something like that please.  

Posted

California has a ton of folks and I understand being cautious, but we have and idea where the problems areas are and where they are going to be.  As a taxpayer in the state, I am not opposed to sending an overage of equipment and personnel to other areas of the country to help out.  We do this a lot in the state, fire fighting comes to mind.

Posted
10 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

He took it seriously far sooner than anyone else. Much to the abuse of the media and the left. Make no mistake China new how bad it was. They disappeared several of their doctors trying to warn the world about it.

 

Lol you must be joking.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
 
Lol you must be joking.
 
 
 

I answer without realizing who was. My bad.[emoji2962]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

New York Governor says "near or at the peak". Question Peak of what? New cases, deaths? 30K new cases just yesterday.  814 deaths yesterday! 

 

New York State 122,031 cases, 4,159 dead, 10,478 recovered. ((4,159 + 10,478) / 122,031)) * 100 = 12% of the current cases have a final resolution. 

 

((4,159 / 122,031) / 122,031)) * 100 = 3.4 MR. Just a few days ago this was just under 2%. A week ago under 1.2%. 

 

What is not being understood is that as the resolution rate increases so does the mortality rate. There are only two resolutions. Life or Death. 

 

Italy has the highest resolution rate of anyone whose numbers any MIGHT trust. A hair over 29%. A long way to go yet. They have currently 15,362 dead. Current mortality rate 12.3% and it has been climbing week over week even though new cases have been on the decline since 3/20/2020. They still have 88,274 person sick. Around 4,000 considered serious. 

 

New York State has 2.5 times as many case as Italy and 1/3 the population. 60.48M v 19.54M. Read that back real slow then look at that Italian MR again. Look at the resolution numbers again. Go to The US COVID-19 Atlas and find New York State. As of 4/3/2020 they had 55,180 beds and 107,394 open cases. Yes not all need a bed and even fewer a vent. China just donated 1,100 vents to NYC. 

 

So what PEAK is the Governor talking about? 

 

Seems we have no shortage of people ignoring "Shelter in Place" orders. Some people just have to pee on the electric fence for themselves. Unbelievable part now is that this self indulgent action is forcing others to pee on the fence with them. 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Surgeon General described the next few days as a 9/11 or Pearl Harbor event.  Not  a good comparison to me, but the difference is during those events the country was speaking and acting with one voice.  Not the case right now, each state for themselves.  If your state was late to the party...

Posted
New York Governor says "near or at the peak". Question Peak of what? New cases, deaths? 30K new cases just yesterday.  814 deaths yesterday! 
 
New York State 122,031 cases, 4,159 dead, 10,478 recovered. ((4,159 + 10,478) / 122,031)) * 100 = 12% of the current cases have a final resolution. 
 
((4,159 / 122,031) / 122,031)) * 100 = 3.4 MR. Just a few days ago this was just under 2%. A week ago under 1.2%. 
 
What is not being understood is that as the resolution rate increases so does the mortality rate. There are only two resolutions. Life or Death. 
 
Italy has the highest resolution rate of anyone whose numbers any MIGHT trust. A hair over 29%. A long way to go yet. They have currently 15,362 dead. Current mortality rate 12.3% and it has been climbing week over week even though new cases have been on the decline since 3/20/2020. They still have 88,274 person sick. Around 4,000 considered serious. 
 
New York State has 2.5 times as many case as Italy and 1/3 the population. 60.48M v 19.54M. Read that back real slow then look at that Italian MR again. Look at the resolution numbers again. Go to The US COVID-19 Atlas and find New York State. As of 4/3/2020 they had 55,180 beds and 107,394 open cases. Yes not all need a bed and even fewer a vent. China just donated 1,100 vents to NYC. 
 
So what PEAK is the Governor talking about? 
 
Seems we have no shortage of people ignoring "Shelter in Place" orders. Some people just have to pee on the electric fence for themselves. Unbelievable part now is that this self indulgent action is forcing others to pee on the fence with them. 
 
 
 
 

I think he’s going by discharge rates versus intake rates. Seems it gets lost in all of this is the goal from the beginning. That was slow the rate so the hospitals could handle the sick. I don’t think anyone really believed that most people would avoid getting this bug. Maybe people now have been made aware that with this bug and other seasonal bugs. Better hygiene and awareness can save the lives of the weak among us.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
 
Lol you must be joking.
 
 
 

I love how you find a cut and edited version from The Guardian. Yeah, they are super trust worthy. I just looked and I can’t even find 1 clip on you tube with Nancy Pelosi and other left media sources telling everybody not to worry. Oh, cause you tube won’t keep that kind of stuff up on there site cause they are lefty hippy crits. Nobody knew what was coming because we haven’t dealt with this before. Everyone’s wrong and everyone will see. The only facts are, this virus came from China, they hid it, the WHO is covering up for China and the most important fact is 700,000 jobless claims and rising. In a couple weeks when the money from the government checks is spent, your gonna start seeing the real issues when you can’t even go down the street without being robbed because of all the desperate hungry people. So keep your dirty politics for Facebook.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, mikedeezxxx said:


I love how you find a cut and edited version from The Guardian. Yeah, they are super trust worthy. I just looked and I can’t even find 1 clip on you tube with Nancy Pelosi and other left media sources telling everybody not to worry. Oh, cause you tube won’t keep that kind of stuff up on there site cause they are lefty hippy crits. Nobody knew what was coming because we haven’t dealt with this before. Everyone’s wrong and everyone will see. The only facts are, this virus came from China, they hid it, the WHO is covering up for China and the most important fact is 700,000 jobless claims and rising. In a couple weeks when the money from the government checks is spent, your gonna start seeing the real issues when you can’t even go down the street without being robbed because of all the desperate hungry people. So keep your dirty politics for Facebook.

Sure, sure "there are fine people on both sides".  But there's only one guy in charge and it matters what he says the most.

 

It's not dirty politics, it's the responsibility of the position.  Take it or leave it.

  • Like 2
Posted
21 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

1/3 of the WORLDS new COVID-19 cases came from the United State yesterday. 

Which country is doing the MOST testing?

"As ye test them, you will find them."

Posted
13 minutes ago, mikedeezxxx said:

Nobody knew what was coming 

Yes they did.  Valuable time allowing for proactive measures was lost. 

  • Like 2
Posted
Sure, sure "there are fine people on both sides".  But there's only one guy in charge and it matters what he says the most.
 
It's not dirty politics, it's the responsibility of the position.  Take it or leave it.

Obviously it’s not up to Trump. If it was, there would be no shut down of anything. He would have let it run its course. The amount of dead people won’t equal what this has done to our economy. Besides, most people that are dying from this were gonna die soon anyways. Most people getting this are recovered or are recovering now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...