Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
A Honda Ridgeline maybe a better fit for you it has a small fuel tank too! it will be great for you because you get to stop fill up all the time. Keep in mind a Tesla has a short range too with a long charge time. This forum is for serious truck enthusiasts you may have better luck pushing your small tank justification somewhere else. Long hauls, heavy towing, even the soccer moms likes a large fuel tank so your not wasting time at the pump. The Chevy 24 gallon tank is just too small for Truck Enthusiasts! Lets make a good truck great GM needs a large fuel tank option! 

You should write GM a strongly worded letter.. they might be so grateful that you informed them of something that every truck enthusiast is wanting that they might send you a bigger tank. Lol
  • Like 2
Posted
On 4/6/2020 at 7:07 PM, swathdiver said:

Me too.  I'd love a larger fuel capacity as well.  But you didn't provide specifics on your wants, how many miles, how many hours? 

 

My old truck with AT tires can travel almost 500 highway miles before refueling.  Around town, she needs refueling about every 12 hours if the average speed is about 30 mph.  My longest time between refueling was 18 hours and she still went 391 miles at an average speed of 22 mph.  The motor used less than 24 gallons burning 1.3 gallons per hour.

 

How much is enough?  It's too bad that the gas tanks are considered emissions devices nowadays.  This is why the aftermarket won't touch them for gasoline powered vehicles.

 

My '88 F-SuperDuty carried an additional 80 gallons; she hauled cargo across country.  

I think a 400 mile range when towing would be a minimum, your buying a truck right! Getting 10 MPG you need a 40 gallon tank to go 400 miles. The new 1/2 tons are like 3/4 tons use to be... a 1/2 ton rated at 13,000 pounds towing seems to be the new normal, it comes with a trailer brake controller these trucks are set up to tow! It seems to me GM forgot one critical peace of a towing rig a larger fuel tank! I Think a larger tank should at least be an option on any truck. A larger fuel tank should come standard with Max tow, trail boss and the 3.73 geared 10 speed off-road diesel what a sweet set up! they just forgot to add a large tank. GM down sized from 26 to 24 gal on the 1/2 tons that seems weird.     

  • Like 3
Posted
6 hours ago, Like-A-Rock44 said:

I think a 400 mile range when towing would be a minimum, your buying a truck right! Getting 10 MPG you need a 40 gallon tank to go 400 miles. The new 1/2 tons are like 3/4 tons use to be... a 1/2 ton rated at 13,000 pounds towing seems to be the new normal, it comes with a trailer brake controller these trucks are set up to tow! It seems to me GM forgot one critical peace of a towing rig a larger fuel tank! I Think a larger tank should at least be an option on any truck. A larger fuel tank should come standard with Max tow, trail boss and the 3.73 geared 10 speed off-road diesel what a sweet set up! they just forgot to add a large tank. GM down sized from 26 to 24 gal on the 1/2 tons that seems weird.     

I think the number in their head is 200 miles while towing at maximum weight, on flat roads, not through Colorado!  We're stopping more frequently anyway so they reckon we don't need to carry around as much fuel.  If 400 miles loaded then we'd have a range in excess of 800 miles.  Maybe I'm typical, maybe not, I have all the bells and whistles for max towing on my truck too.  In three years I've towed only for about a week, maybe a day or two more.  

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, 3737 said:

Trump rolls back fuel economy standards and emissions standards. 

 

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/business/autos/2020/03/31/trump-rolls-back-obama-mpg-rules/5093643002/

 

There ya go, can cut out the beuqacratic bs and engineer the best truck, no excuses

We need to get POTUS to rescind regulations that treat fuel tanks as emissions control devices too.  Then you'll see the aftermarket step in with larger tanks.

Edited by swathdiver
Posted
8 hours ago, 3737 said:

Trump rolls back fuel economy standards and emissions standards. 

 

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/business/autos/2020/03/31/trump-rolls-back-obama-mpg-rules/5093643002/

 

There ya go, can cut out the beuqacratic bs and engineer the best truck, no excuses

While I knew arbitrary standards had been imposed I didn't realize just how crazy they were.  54.5 mpg fleet by 2025? 

 

Jack Gillis, executive director of Consumer Federation of America, chastised the Trump administration for moving to roll back the Obama-era mileage rules during the coronavirus pandemic. 

"This tone-deaf, irresponsible effort will cost consumers at the pump, cost American jobs, reduce the value of U.S. vehicles globally and further damage the environment and the air we breathe," Gillis said.

 

Are you kidding me?

  • Like 1
Posted

The rollback won't do any good.  The next liberal/socialist president in office will simply re-instate them and many of the auto manufacturers are already onboard with the new tighter standards anyway in order to appear "enviro friendly" to perspective customers.  It's only a small group of us grouchy always complaining never pleased yahoos who don't want the tighter standards, apparently. 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 4/11/2020 at 2:03 PM, Colossus said:

The rollback won't do any good.  The next liberal/socialist president in office will simply re-instate them and many of the auto manufacturers are already onboard with the new tighter standards anyway in order to appear "enviro friendly" to perspective customers.  It's only a small group of us grouchy always complaining never pleased yahoos who don't want the tighter standards, apparently. 

They've been bouncing them back and forth since introduction.  This is why there are no cars anymore, the government's regulations basically made them cost prohibitive and too ugly for the consumer to want them.  Trucks are safer and better anyway.

Posted

I hear a lot of you saying you don’t really use your truck for much truck stuff. Don’t really tow, its good enough for the few times I use it as a truck, I need to look cool when I get the grocery’s I like to stop a lot to move around... so the small fuel tank suits me just fine. Well as GM trucks be come more car like small fuel tanks, high gearing, single speed transfer case the brand will be know for posers driving their trucks. Remember the military Humvee kicked off Hummer H1 it was cool because it was a capable off road machine then the H2 and H3 came out what a joke no off road capability like the H1 so Hummer became the brand for Posers driving on the blacktop.      

Posted
I hear a lot of you saying you don’t really use your truck for much truck stuff. Don’t really tow, its good enough for the few times I use it as a truck, I need to look cool when I get the grocery’s I like to stop a lot to move around... so the small fuel tank suits me just fine. Well as GM trucks be come more car like small fuel tanks, high gearing, single speed transfer case the brand will be know for posers driving their trucks. Remember the military Humvee kicked off Hummer H1 it was cool because it was a capable off road machine then the H2 and H3 came out what a joke no off road capability like the H1 so Hummer became the brand for Posers driving on the blacktop.      

I think you’re a troll

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

He's not really wrong though.

 

Lots of people do own a truck just because they can and not because they need it for the trucks capabilities.

  • Like 2
Posted

Does the weight really matter... cut a little plastic off the fuel tank WTF? Extra speakers subwoofers add weight, The trailer break controller adds weight, the trailer hitch adds weight, the multi pro tailgate adds weight and it hits the trailer hitch when it goes down so really if you have the multi pro tailgate it should delete the trailer hitch, to save weight right?... The spray in bed liner adds weight. There is lots of stuff that adds weight that the aftermarket can cover and add later!! but the aftermarket cant cover the fuel tank so guess what don’t make it small. What a huge mistake and disservice to the customer shrinking the fuel tank size.    

Posted
9 hours ago, Like-A-Rock44 said:

Does the weight really matter... 

Yes!  When you're competing against Ford and Ram, if you want a higher payload capacity, you want your rig to weigh less than the competition.  Curb weight includes a full tank of fuel.  In sales literature, the payload is based on a truck with no options.  My truck has 158 pounds of options which reduces its payload capacity as much down to 1499 pounds.

 

 

Posted
11 hours ago, Like-A-Rock44 said:

I hear a lot of you saying you don’t really use your truck for much truck stuff. Don’t really tow, its good enough for the few times I use it as a truck, I need to look cool when I get the grocery’s I like to stop a lot to move around... so the small fuel tank suits me just fine. Well as GM trucks be come more car like small fuel tanks, high gearing, single speed transfer case the brand will be know for posers driving their trucks. Remember the military Humvee kicked off Hummer H1 it was cool because it was a capable off road machine then the H2 and H3 came out what a joke no off road capability like the H1 so Hummer became the brand for Posers driving on the blacktop.      

Regardless of whether someone owns a truck to just drive it around like a car or use it to tow/haul, what difference does that make to you?  You keep pretending GM gas tanks are small yet they aren't any smaller than the Ford or RAM offerings.  2020 RAM 1500 has a 23 gallon tank, no options for a larger one.  2020 Ford 150 has a 23 gallon tank standard with an option for a 36 gallon tank.  Silverado/GMC 1500 are 24 gallon tanks.  Gee, looks like GM has a 1 gallon larger thank by default than Ford or RAM.  Not that 1 gallon really makes any difference.

 

I use my truck to tow and haul plenty of stuff yet the 24 gallon tank is more than sufficient for what I do.  I don't do much in the way of long distance towing but even if I need to, its not like I can't stop at a gas station and fill up as needed.  While I'm sure there are people who might use the larger tank, most people don't drive 300+ mile distances towing with a 1500 truck.  If you are doing that you probably bought a 2500/3500 with a diesel.  There is a lot more to designing and building a truck than just a large fuel tank.  You want a big fuel tank?  Buy a truck with dual tanks.

  • Like 1
Posted
Ford shrank their base gas tank too. The big tank is optional. It is 100% lazy engineering, an easy way to cut weight when they literally go down to the gram when considering part weight cost. People who aren't bothered by it must like having long trips interrupted more often.
Agreed, my next pickup will have a tank no smaller than 35 gallons. I need the range when towing, and I like to keep my tank filled above 50% for day to day use, which is much easier with a larger tank.

PS- My 1990 had a 35 gallon tank.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,958
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    B07
    Newest Member
    B07
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 649 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Looks like it's riveted to me. What is wrong with that 1? Welcome to the Forum!
    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
    • Looking for this part for my truck. They don't sell just that one piece and to get it you have to pay over $100 even used for the whole air tube. The piece the hose clamp snaps into that is held on by the screw and nut. If anyone has access to one please let me know.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...