Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Wrong wrong wrong.  [emoji14] 

GM recommends using 93 octane gasoline for its top-of-the-line 6.2-liter V-8-equipped trucks. The owner’s manual does state as low as 87 octane is acceptable for the engine. However, to achieve maximum performance and fuel economy you must use 93.
 
So with that being said- you can get by fine for a few tanks of 87.  Won't have the same performance as you would running 91 or 93 but go ahead and do it if 91/93 is not available.  (91 above 3500-4000ft is essentially the same as 93 at sea level)
 
https://pickuptrucktalk.com/2020/10/misleading-these-trucks-recommend-or-require-premium-fuel/
 
So SHUT UP and drive. 
You can't get 93 in California. Only 91.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
On 1/6/2021 at 12:06 PM, Transient said:

You can't get 93 in California. Only 91.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

we do have  a few 100 pumps at my local station, but price is $10/gal. but your gas milage is like 18mpg in the city and 40 mpg highway on that stuff. still not worth it. but dense hydrocarbons sure do put legs on these motors.

 

the 210 thermostat and 87 octane on a 12:1 CR motor =  sounds a bit dumb,

 

91 octane gives you a 2mpg gain over the cheap stuff. do the math  you'll see your paying more for 87 fuel /mile

 

Edited by flyingfool
Posted
we do have  a few 100 pumps at my local station, but price is $10/gal. but your gas milage is like 18mpg in the city and 40 mpg highway on that stuff. still not worth it. but dense hydrocarbons sure do put legs on these motors.
 
the 210 thermostat and 87 octane on a 12:1 CR motor =  sounds a bit dumb,
 
91 octane gives you a 2mpg gain over the cheap stuff. do the math  you'll see your paying more for 87 fuel /mile
 
I have a 6.2 and only use the premium fuel at top tier gas stations

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Ok to add a little lightness to the discussion, when that zombie apocalypse arrive, your going to want as much fuel as possible to get away!

There are aftermarket options for the diesel but fewer for the gasser and none that replace the factory tank. For gasser HD when towing and getting 8mpg x36 gallons gives a max of 288miles. Now your going to stop earlier than that so at about 250 miles of travel which is less than 4 hours of traveling. I would like to travel 6 hours a day and fill up at the end which would require a 50 gallon tank. More efficient travel. Thats my reasoning behind wanting a larger tank. I do stop every few hours but its mostly roadside to piss or eat. Pulling a large 35' rig into some stations is not always the best option so doing it once a day is preferable.

Posted

I terrine only filling up while there's sunlight. Zombies are noisy, but B-rated movies have taught me they can use the darkness to sneak up on you. At least you'll have a better chance of seeing them coming while there's sunlight. Imo, filling up right before sundown and driving all night is better than driving all day. I could be wrong, and it wouldn't be the first time. However, Hollywood can't put anything in a movie that isn't true.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 2/26/2021 at 9:59 AM, GMC4Zee said:

Ok to add a little lightness to the discussion, when that zombie apocalypse arrive, your going to want as much fuel as possible to get away!

There are aftermarket options for the diesel but fewer for the gasser and none that replace the factory tank. For gasser HD when towing and getting 8mpg x36 gallons gives a max of 288miles. Now your going to stop earlier than that so at about 250 miles of travel which is less than 4 hours of traveling. I would like to travel 6 hours a day and fill up at the end which would require a 50 gallon tank. More efficient travel. Thats my reasoning behind wanting a larger tank. I do stop every few hours but its mostly roadside to piss or eat. Pulling a large 35' rig into some stations is not always the best option so doing it once a day is preferable.

Not as nice as a bigger replacement tank underneath, but a transfer tank in the bed and you can pump to the trucks tank when stopped for a bio break. 

Posted
20 hours ago, redwngr said:

Not as nice as a bigger replacement tank underneath, but a transfer tank in the bed and you can pump to the trucks tank when stopped for a bio break. 

I wish there were a gas approved tank available for the bed.. diesel yes but not gas in my area.  Ironic that I can put five jerry cans of gas in the bed but not a tank.  I'd love to have a 30+ gallon tank with a pump or directly connected to the existing gas tank.  I wouldn't necessary fill the bed tank but would use it primarily on long trips.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 463 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...