Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I replaced the idler with a SuperSteer one and I took apart the original.  Zero Grease!  I decided to check the ball joints and tie rods, guess what.. Zero Grease.  I don't know if this was just my truck or if the standards of building things here in America have just ceased to exist.  I highly recommend you all check to see if you truck is greased in the front end.  There should be a total of 9 zerk fittings.  This should be at least done by the dealer before sale is my thoughts.  I purchased my truck from "Dale Earnhardt Chevy" in Tallahassee.  I realize after a ton of issues with that dealer that they are all crooks!

Edited by Lightenup
Posted

That is just another reason foreign cars assembled in the US by non-union workers are pulling ahead of the big 3, shabby assembly by all three.

Posted

This isn't a union thing.  This is a bean-counter thing.

 

GM demands the parts be as cheap as possible, and skimping on grease is one way to do it.  The assembly line is setup with the assumption the parts are pre-greased sufficiently, so there is no greasing station that the union workers are just ignoring.

 

It has just enough grease to get it out of warranty.  For GM, that's good enough.

 

Now, if you want it to last, definitely get under there and grease it yourself.  And perhaps replace the bits without grease nipples with ones that have them as they wear out (it's my understanding GM has been reducing the number of grease nipples over the last 10 or so years).

 

And I would also assume, if you get the truck serviced by the dealer, that they also don't bother greasing anything.

Posted

I read this post and decided to grease my new LTZ just to make sure everything was lubed.  I was pleased that this truck is easier to grease than either of my two prior HD's.  two less zerks and the remainder are more accessible.  That said, it was obvious that all points had grease from the factory and there weren't any issues.  My thoughts are that the one thing any HD owner should do himself or herself is to buy a grease gun and grease the fittings yourself.  It's not hard, it can be done with the truck sitting on the ground and takes about 30 minutes.  The front skid plate  under the radiator needs to be removed to get to three of the fittings.  Four 15mm bolts hold it and it comes down out of the way.   I doubt many, if any dealers or oil change shops ever grease all of the fittings because it's too time consuming and bothersome for them.  Just my two cents worth!

Posted

Supposed to be greased during PDI.  I grease all my new vehicles right after I buy them just to be sure.  Even grease the new trucks at work when we get them.  It's hit or miss if the dealer does it.  At least GM trucks still have zerks!    

Posted

Mine was not greased by the dealer, I pointed that out and they claimed it is not needed as they are greased at factory.  I claim otherwise, they were all pretty dry.  Bean counter thing, imagine how much grease GM saves at a couple ounces per truck.  Dealer said they always grease them at the first free oil change.  Gee thanks!   

Posted

You won't burst any fittings.

The grease-able steering linkage joints are all made to let grease to ooze out, otherwise, you couldn't get the grease in.

Pump grease in until it oozes out.

That way you know the old grease is flushed out of the wearing parts of the joint and only new grease is in there.

The same goes for grease-able u-joints, grease-able sliding driveshaft yokes, etc.

Posted (edited)
On 6/2/2020 at 6:26 PM, Lightenup said:

I replaced the idler with a SuperSteer one and I took apart the original.  Zero Grease!  I decided to check the ball joints and tie rods, guess what.. Zero Grease.  I don't know if this was just my truck or if the standards of building things here in America have just ceased to exist.  I highly recommend you all check to see if you truck is greased in the front end.  There should be a total of 9 zerk fittings.  This should be at least done by the dealer before sale is my thoughts.  I purchased my truck from "Dale Earnhardt Chevy" in Tallahassee.  I realize after a ton of issues with that dealer that they are all crooks!

 

 

They are greased.  Most likely from whatever department at the assembly plant installs the front suspension or by the supplier who supplies GM the components.  They just are filled with a bare minimum amount of grease.  Just like front and rear diffs are all volume filled by the supplier.

 

On 6/3/2020 at 10:59 AM, redwngr said:

Dealer should be doing the PDI they are getting paid for. 

 

 

 

They are doing the PDI.  Greasing the zerks is not part of PDI.  They even stopped doing fluid level checks under the vehicle and the test drive starting late 2018.  

 

On 6/4/2020 at 1:30 AM, C/K Man said:

Supposed to be greased during PDI.  I grease all my new vehicles right after I buy them just to be sure.  Even grease the new trucks at work when we get them.  It's hit or miss if the dealer does it.  At least GM trucks still have zerks!    

 

False.  Here is the 2020 HD PDI form.  No where on there does it mention "grease the fittings".

 

 

2020 PDI.pdf

Edited by newdude
Posted
11 minutes ago, newdude said:

 

 

 

 

 

  Here is the 2020 HD PDI form. 

2020 PDI.pdf 86 kB · 3 downloads

Thanks for posting!

 

Any idea how much def is in the tank from the factory?

I'm assuming the 2.5 gal added at pdi doesn't 'fill the tank'? 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
7 hours ago, newdude said:

 

 

They are greased.  Most likely from whatever department at the assembly plant installs the front suspension or by the supplier who supplies GM the components.  They just are filled with a bare minimum amount of grease.  Just like front and rear diffs are all volume filled by the supplier.

 

 

They are doing the PDI.  Greasing the zerks is not part of PDI.  They even stopped doing fluid level checks under the vehicle and the test drive starting late 2018.  

 

 

False.  Here is the 2020 HD PDI form.  No where on there does it mention "grease the fittings".

 

 

2020 PDI.pdf 86 kB · 16 downloads

Noted.  Wonder when that changed?

  • 6 months later...
Posted (edited)

Just had my new 2020 2500HD Custom in for undercoating. The tech mentioned in the invoice none of the front end joints showed any grease so he greased them. I found this disconcerting for a new vehicle to not be properly quality controlled. 

Edited by DGL
Posted

That seems to be normal now, fewer zerks, and they don't get any more grease than whatever they got when the part was manufactured...

It's not that someone didn't do their job, but rather, the job was deemed to be completed when the part was made.

Posted
4 hours ago, davester said:

That seems to be normal now, fewer zerks, and they don't get any more grease than whatever they got when the part was manufactured...

It's not that someone didn't do their job, but rather, the job was deemed to be completed when the part was made.

This could be part of it.  I work at a large state university and rebuild a lot of electric pump and fan motors and the new bearings have very little grease in them now.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...