Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've had mine on since about a week after I got my truck. Love them and will put them on any truck I buy. No issues whatsoever. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Seeing as you're from Michigan I would take the snow into consideration. I had a set on my K2 and loved them until winter hit. Once you do a bit of driving on the highway and that slush builds up and freezes they become a pain. I had them freeze solid on me a few times and they wouldn't actuate open. I found myself at the coin op car washes a few times a week trying to clear them off.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

681EDBBF-F064-49E6-9129-C7105355BD47.thumb.jpeg.279a5f0c6161625f7a465a69ad01cf4e.jpeg
 

I’m very happy with them. Last winter was fairly mild here in WI but I didn’t have any trouble with the snow or freeze ups. The little front mud flap seems to divert most of it.

Posted
1 hour ago, OnTheReel said:

681EDBBF-F064-49E6-9129-C7105355BD47.thumb.jpeg.279a5f0c6161625f7a465a69ad01cf4e.jpeg
 

I’m very happy with them. Last winter was fairly mild here in WI but I didn’t have any trouble with the snow or freeze ups. The little front mud flap seems to divert most of it.

They look nice on your truck!  My truck parks in a heated garage over night, so the freezing shouldn't be too big a deal.  I see they sell 3 different models of steps - what did you buy?  Is it necessary to get the model with two motors per side?

Posted
6 minutes ago, NonTypicalCPA said:

They look nice on your truck!  My truck parks in a heated garage over night, so the freezing shouldn't be too big a deal.  I see they sell 3 different models of steps - what did you buy?  Is it necessary to get the model with two motors per side?

Mine are the basic ones, single motor. I can’t see a reason I would need anything more.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I too am looking to have these installed in the future.
 

Just talked to my local dealer and asked him the same question about the XL version with the two motors. He explained that unless your truck is lifted considerably he would recommend against the XL models. They apparently drop lower then the standard model and may be too low to be effective. In my mind more motors are better but not if they drop so low they are useless. 

Posted

I have had mine for a little over a week. Installed them myself in my driveway, took about 3 hours total.

 

On a stock height 2020 Silverado 1500 4x4 LTZ, they seem to drop low. When measured it's about 8 inches from ground to top of step.

 

Once I figure out a lift for the truck, they will make more sense.

 

20200929_091737.jpg

20200929_091835.jpg

Posted
50 minutes ago, Kevin Eddy said:

I have had mine for a little over a week. Installed them myself in my driveway, took about 3 hours total.

 

On a stock height 2020 Silverado 1500 4x4 LTZ, they seem to drop low. When measured it's about 8 inches from ground to top of step.

 

Once I figure out a lift for the truck, they will make more sense.

 

20200929_091737.jpg

20200929_091835.jpg

Did you buy the regular ones or the XL?  I just ordered mine today and will also be installing them myself.  

Posted
30 minutes ago, Philipgonzales3 said:

Did you buy the regular ones or the XL?  I just ordered mine today and will also be installing them myself.  

I bought the regular, NON-XL.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Didn't even make it on the truck!  ?‍♂️

 

Sorry for the low quality photos.  I used the thumbnail pic from Google photos so I could upload several pics.  I was too lazy to resize the original pics.  

 

I'm pretty ticked off that Amp Research doesn't put ANY foam in the shipping box.  They expect a thin layer of saran wrap type plastic to protect these steps.  Thinking about not ordering again as I have no faith in these steps making it here.  

 

 

20200930_154851.jpg

20200930_154904.jpg

20200930_154938.jpg

20200930_155022.jpg

20200930_155401.jpg

Posted

Well I guess the squeaky wheel gets the grease.  I called Amp Research and explained what happened.  I complained about the lack of packing material and was told that's just how it is.  They ship them with either paper or plastic.  No foam or anything like that.  Dude told me I could go through warranty.  Was pretty indifferent about it.  I figured just replacing the boards under warranty and pushing ahead with my install was the easiest thing for me rather than going through the refund process with the reseller.  I'm pretty satisfied with that.  So I'm a happy camper for now.  I'll get ready to queue up some curse words for the install process though :-).

Posted
12 hours ago, Philipgonzales3 said:

Got them installed :-).

 

 

 

Damn it! I really want them now!!! Lol

 

They look great. 
 

What is everyone paying for them? I spoke to my local performance shop that just installed my exhaust. They are an authorized seller / installer so I am thinking of going that route in case they start acting up. Guy said they will support them no problem. 
 

I used to own a series of Tacoma’s for 10+ years. There was always a group buy of some sort going in for things like this. Are there any group buys to speak of here or on products like this? Seems like someone with a relationship with the manufacturer could work out a deal on 50 or so of these. Maybe not in a COVID world though. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...