Jump to content

Looking for help with major oil leak - video attached - 2012 Silverado - 5.3L

LaMarCalvert
 Share

Recommended Posts

LaMarCalvert Enthusiast

LaMarCalvert

Posted
Posted

Good morning All!

 

Looking for some help for my son's 2012 Silverado, 4WD, 5.3L. I have attached a video of a pretty bad oil leak my son has on hi truck. Video is BEFORE any repairs were attempted.

 

1. Son thought it was the oil pan gasket, so he went through the process of removing front differential, and other parts to perform repair. Halfway through disassembly he realized it was NOT the oil pan.

2. He then thought it was the rear main oil seal, so he put truck back together, and had it towed to my house. I spent the last 3 weekends figuring out howto, and then replacing the rear main cover/seal.

3. Started truck and still $%%& leaking!

 

Son shared this video with me, and I viewed it several times now, and based on what I saw under the truck and the video, this looks like the oil pressure sender, or something up higher. It is clear to me now that we worked on the wrong thing!

 

I am about ready to pull all the remaining hair out my head on this, and was hoping someone could view the video and give their thoughts?

 

Is it the pressure sending unit, or possibly a valve cover (I doubt this, but possible), or intake gasket?

 

It is now below freezing in Michigan, and I do not have this truck in the garage (I WAS in the middle of my rebuild on my 1985 Camaro, so I have no room, and need to get this truck fixed, or towed to a shop if it out of my abilities).

 

txab Senior Enthusiast

txab

Posted
Posted (edited)

I'd look into pressure sending unit. Looks like it is from up high.

Edited by txab
LaMarCalvert Enthusiast

LaMarCalvert

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I got a response from you - txab via email, but it doesn't show up here - you asked if I checked the oil cooler attachment at the block - where doe the oil cooler lines connect to the block?

 

I have to get back under there, but I was assuming they are attached somewhere near the oil filter housing, and the leak is not coming from that are.

 

Appreciate the responses txab!

txab Senior Enthusiast

txab

Posted
Posted (edited)

Those two lines that the oil is running around is what I thought was oil cooler lines until after viewing this on a different device, noticed I was seeing the trams cooler lines apparently. The engine oil cooler lines attach near the oil filter location. Your oil is running from up high, imo

 

Common item is a failed pressure sensor. This is a leak under pressure, imo.    Intake is dry on these engines. No oil/water

 

I'm not familiar enough with this generation engine to know the locations of cam and crank sensors, but those can be other leak locations

Edited by txab
LaMarCalvert Enthusiast

LaMarCalvert

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I have this little inspection camera with a small display - gonna try to view the pressure switch with this, and hopefully this is the culprit! I will post an update either way, once I get this figured out.

txab Senior Enthusiast

txab

Posted
Posted

If you change the sensor there is a screen beneath it that needs to be changed as well

Mike GMC Enthusiast

Mike GMC

Posted
Posted

Are we 100% sure that's engine oil and not trans fluid?  The only possible things that could leak that much oil back by the Bell housing are the oil pressure sending unit and the cam position sensor.  I think the 12 still has the cam position sensor next to the oil sending unit.  Pull the intake manifold so you can get a good look back there.

LaMarCalvert Enthusiast

LaMarCalvert

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Mike - Yes, 100% certain that is engine oil.

 

So...last night, I tried to use the "My Lizard Cam" to see back there where the oil pressure sensor is located, and observe while running. Like txab said, I am certain this is a leak under pressure, as it did not start leaking immediately upon start-up, but soon after.

 

It is very oily back there, but could not see the steady stream I was seeing under the truck. Also, was able to squeeze my hand back there, and wiped all around the base of the oil pressure sensor, and it is actually dry there...there is oily buildup on that surface just below the sensor on the back of the block...where it bolts to the transmission.

 

With the fact that I now know that intake is dry, I am going to follow Mike's advice, and take the upper intake manifold off, to hopefully see better. It now seems to point to the cam sensor. 

 

I want to try to uv dye in the oil before tearing into again, in the hopes of helping point out the source. Anyone had any luck with a particular brand/kit?

 

(I tried this years ago, and maybe it was inexperience back then, but I do not recall being able to see the uv dye using the "special" glasses and light. Maybe it was the product I was using)

 

In any event, Thanks Gentlemen for the advice on this. I will continue to post updates, as this has been a learning experience, and have no problem sharing the solution.

LaMarCalvert Enthusiast

LaMarCalvert

Posted
  • Author
Posted

SOLVED: Update to this issue - Valley pan cover was the culprit!

 

All the "You-Tube sleuthing" watching the various videos on this topic did help a lot, but caused a lot of confusion, until I went to the GM OEM information. The RPO code is LC9, so I obtained the exploded parts diagram, and found that this engine has cylinder deactivation solenoids under the valley cover, and NOT knock sensors on the top of the valley cover.

 

Had my son order oil pressure sensor, filter, cam sensor, intake gasket, and valve cover gaskets from RockAuto.com. Parts arrived in 2 days!

 

Removed the intake manifold, and found the root cause almost immediately! OF the 11 bolts holding the valley pan cover in place, 8 were finger loose! Also, no evidence of any threadlocker ever being on the bolt threads.

 

Also, there was no cam sensor next to the oil pressure sensor; there was the connector for the cylinder deactivation solenoids only.

 

Everything was cleaned up nice, and as an added measure, I added a very light film of RTV to the Valley pan mounting area and the valve cover mounting areas, just to give a little hold for the gaskets. OEM instructions say not to, but after following the OEM directions on my transmission pan gasket, this was the way to go. Not good gobs, or even a small bead - just used my fingertip to lightly coat the sealing area. Also, used high strength removable threadlocker (Permatex - orange bottle) on the valley pan cover bolts.

 

I installed the intake manifold gasket dry, as the OEM recommended.

 

Started teardown and completed repair on Saturday, thanks to the RockAuto parts arriving one hour after I had cleaned everything up from teardown. Also, did this in 35 degree weather in my driveway.

 

Truck now has no leaks!

 

I think all the oil leakage contaminated the MAF sensor (intake had oil in it near the throttle body), and he had a bad oxygen sensor - Got a check Engine light on start-up.

 

Replaced both, and truck running good as new.

 

Hopefully, this information will help somebody else out, as I have spent about 6 - 7 weeks working on this truck (in between working and day-to-day life), and was ready to call an audible, lol!

 

One last note - when we did the rear main seal repair, we found several of the 12 mounting bolts for that cover were finger loose as well. We used threadlocker here as well.

  • Like 1
Mike GMC Enthusiast

Mike GMC

Posted
Posted

Glad you got it fixed.  I have to admit, that's the first I've heard of loose bolts like that.  Might be worth re-torquing the rest of the engine bolts as well like the front cover, pan and maybe exhaust as well.

Jibe New Member

Jibe

Posted
Posted

I am working on a similar but different issue. 

Where does one access the 'GM OEM info' you referenced here:

Quote

All the "You-Tube sleuthing" watching the various videos on this topic did help a lot, but caused a lot of confusion, until I went to the GM OEM information. The RPO code is LC9, so I obtained the exploded parts diagram, and found that this engine has cylinder deactivation solenoids under the valley cover, and NOT knock sensors on the top of the valley cover. 

 

davester Senior Enthusiast

davester

Posted
Posted

At a site like alldatadiy.com for an online subscription to the info, or helminc.com/amazon/ebay for paper versions (if available).

Takes a little bit of time for them to be available, so if you have a brand new truck, I don't believe it is available yet, you should contact them first before subscribing to make sure it's available.

LaMarCalvert Enthusiast

LaMarCalvert

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Jibe - I work for GM, so I have access to all the Service Manual information for ALL years. There are lots of exploded parts diagrams, listed by RPO code, so once I found the RPO code sticker in my son's truck, it was clear what I was working with.

 

If you need something particular, I should be able to help you out.

  • 2 weeks later...
Gagliano7 Enthusiast

Gagliano7

Posted
Posted

FYI the cam sensor on the gen lV motors are on the timing chain cover. Gen 3 99-06 and 07 classic is at the top back by the oil pressure sensor.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • AidenVorpagel
      cam upgrade in CA

      By AidenVorpagel · Posted

      hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • B14Sierra
      Noise after AFM delete

      By B14Sierra · Posted

      Did you figure it out?
    • B14Sierra
      Possible lifter tick after DOD delete

      By B14Sierra · Posted

      Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...