Jump to content

Best Engine for Towing: 5.3 vs 6.1?

R J
 Share

Recommended Posts

R J Enthusiast

R J

Posted
Posted

Happy new year everyone. I have a 2020 Trail Boss Custom with the 5.3 6-speed. I have a 30 foot 5500 pound travel trailer that I‘ll be towing with the Trail Boss. The truck tows good (no swaying) but with a 4 passengers I feel like it’s a bit a sluggish. I’m curious to hear from other owners about your experience towing with the 5.3 vs 6.2. Is it worth the upgrade to a 6.2 Trail Boss LT with the 10 speed? I’d eventually want to go cross country with the travel trailer. Thank you.

 

travel trailer specs

32 feet overall length

5500 dry weight 

590 tongue weight

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

AdamAT4
AdamAT4

The 5.3 with 10 speed would be my pick as 87 fuel is cheaper and either engine is gonna burn a pile. The 10 speed helps a lot with towing. My cousin went from the 5.3 to the 6.6 HD. Towing fuel econ

jnissen
jnissen

Curious why your not including the 3.0L turbo diesel in your question. Look into it as well as it has gobs of torque and can come with two different rear gear ratios along with the 10 speed. Towing an

LowCountryDenali
LowCountryDenali

My 2020 with 6.2 easily tows a 28' Airstream with dry weight 5980/GVWR 7600 and Hitch weight @ 903.  I'd recommend the 3.0 Duramax or the 6.2 assuming you've got your heart set on a new truck and are

Posted Images

AdamAT4 Enthusiast

AdamAT4

Posted
Posted

The 5.3 with 10 speed would be my pick as 87 fuel is cheaper and either engine is gonna burn a pile. The 10 speed helps a lot with towing.

My cousin went from the 5.3 to the 6.6 HD. Towing fuel economy is about the same but the truck handles the trailer much better especially in winter.

Sent from my SM-N975W using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
jnissen Enthusiast

jnissen

Posted
Posted

Curious why your not including the 3.0L turbo diesel in your question. Look into it as well as it has gobs of torque and can come with two different rear gear ratios along with the 10 speed. Towing and non towing mileage is hard to beat.

  • Like 2
OnTheReel Senior Enthusiast

OnTheReel

Posted
Posted

Seems he has his heart set on the LT Trail Boss; diesel isn’t available. 5.3 or 6.2, both with 10 speed and 3.23s.

 

Either one would be an upgrade from the 5.3 6 speed, but I’d go 6.2 or skip up to the HD if I was towing that a lot. 

  • Like 1
calgator73 Senior Enthusiast

calgator73

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, R J said:

Happy new year everyone. I have a 2020 Trail Boss Custom with the 5.3 6-speed. I have a 30 foot 5500 pound travel trailer that I‘ll be towing with the Trail Boss. The truck tows good (no swaying) but with a 4 passengers I feel like it’s a bit a sluggish. I’m curious to hear from other owners about your experience towing with the 5.3 vs 6.2. Is it worth the upgrade to a 6.2 Trail Boss LT with the 10 speed? I’d eventually want to go cross country with the travel trailer. Thank you.

 

travel trailer specs

32 feet overall length

5500 dry weight 

590 tongue weight

6.2 ftw.... From a dollars perspective you might consider doing a ring and pinion change to a 3.73.

 

I had a 2014 max tow with same tranny but with the 3.73 and had no issues maintaining 65 with nearly 10k behind me. 

 

6.2 with the 10 spd will be a little better getting it up to speed but I think it comes down to what you want to spend.

 

Btw the 5.3 loves e85... That's 380hp.  Check this

 

https://gmauthority.com/blog/2013/07/lingenfelter-performance-puts-the-2014-silverado-on-the-dyno-with-video/amp/

 

That makes it a fun toy around town

 

AdamAT4 Enthusiast

AdamAT4

Posted
Posted
6.2 ftw.... From a dollars perspective you might consider doing a ring and pinion change to a 3.73.
 
I had a 2014 max tow with same tranny but with the 3.73 and had no issues maintaining 65 with nearly 10k behind me. 
 
6.2 with the 10 spd will be a little better getting it up to speed but I think it comes down to what you want to spend.
 
Btw the 5.3 loves e85... That's 380hp.  Check this
 
https://gmauthority.com/blog/2013/07/lingenfelter-performance-puts-the-2014-silverado-on-the-dyno-with-video/amp/
 
That makes it a fun toy around town
 
Id like to know what it would cost for 3.73s in these trucks... never did gearing on an IFS truck before.

Sent from my SM-N975W using Tapatalk

TNTSierra Senior Enthusiast

TNTSierra

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, calgator73 said:

6.2 ftw.... From a dollars perspective you might consider doing a ring and pinion change to a 3.73.

 

I had a 2014 max tow with same tranny but with the 3.73 and had no issues maintaining 65 with nearly 10k behind me. 

 

6.2 with the 10 spd will be a little better getting it up to speed but I think it comes down to what you want to spend.

 

Btw the 5.3 loves e85... That's 380hp.  Check this

 

https://gmauthority.com/blog/2013/07/lingenfelter-performance-puts-the-2014-silverado-on-the-dyno-with-video/amp/

 

That makes it a fun toy around town

 

That’s if it’s E85 compatible. Some of the K2s were not and would throw a code. My 2016 was not and threw a code along with check engine light. 

I have not read anywhere that the new T1 5.3l are E85 compatible. So they would throw codes as well. 

bshort Enthusiast

bshort

Posted
Posted

Hard to imagine that people towed heavier travel trailers with a 350 3-speed.   Your advertised tongue weight doesn't take into account all your stuff in the trailer, water, propane and batteries.  Your actual tongue weight (including your four occupants) is probably close to or exceeding your payload.  Welcome to 2500 territory.  The 6.2 will pull it, but the ride and handling will be the same.  

calgator73 Senior Enthusiast

calgator73

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, TNTSilverado said:

That’s if it’s E85 compatible. Some of the K2s were not and would throw a code. My 2016 was not and threw a code along with check engine light. 

I have not read anywhere that the new T1 5.3l are E85 compatible. So they would throw codes as well. 

That's a good point.  A custom trail boss with the 5.3 and 6-speed is an L82.  From everything I am reading the l82 with 6-speed is the only v8 configuration with native e85 capability.  But I also see they make that engine e85 compatible and not.  I don't remember the RPO code for that capability but it would be easy to tell by looking at the fuel line underneath the driver side.  There should be an alcohol sensor there.

TNTSierra Senior Enthusiast

TNTSierra

Posted
Posted (edited)
51 minutes ago, calgator73 said:

That's a good point.  A custom trail boss with the 5.3 and 6-speed is an L82.  From everything I am reading the l82 with 6-speed is the only v8 configuration with native e85 capability.  But I also see they make that engine e85 compatible and not.  I don't remember the RPO code for that capability but it would be easy to tell by looking at the fuel line underneath the driver side.  There should be an alcohol sensor there.

It will have a E85 decal, a yellow gas cap or tag on fuel door stating E85 and yes, a sensor that allows the engine to read the E85. The sensor is what allows the truck to run properly without throwing the code. Most of the 5.3L came from

factory in the K2 with a plug to eventually put a sensor in. When I wanted to tuned my K2 6.2L the tuner said some 6.2L had the plug already but some didn’t and would have to install it to run it in E85. 
I will tell you though when I put E85 in my 2016, that thing would FLY. I took down my step dads Ecobust with it. I was truly impressed how well that thing ran just by simple gas swap.  

Edited by TNTSilverado
R J Enthusiast

R J

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I appreciate the replies so far. I have no issues with sway, floating feeling or handling when towing the travel trailer. It goes really well from a handling standpoint but just adequate on power. I will be towing this trailer about 6 times a year.

AlaskaErik Enthusiast

AlaskaErik

Posted
Posted (edited)

I was facing the same dilemma as you.  5500 lb trailer, but a 2016 5.3 with the six speed.  The 5.3 was just too sluggish in the mountains.  My 2019 has the 6.2 and it tows so much better.  I also have the Max Trailering package.  Both trucks have the 3.42 axle.  Upgrading to 3.73 is not going to solve anything.  But no way would I ever go back to the 5.3 to tow a trailer that weight.  The difference is very noticeable.   

Edited by AlaskaErik
Rodek Enthusiast

Rodek

Posted
Posted

I have a 5.3 with 10 speed and pull a 6900 lbs loaded 30 ft Jayco 25RB  with the 3.23 gear with no issues at all. The 10 speed does indeed make a huge difference. I wanted the 5.3 because I didn't want to have to use the premium fuel GM says to use with the 6.2. I use a Recurve R3 weight distribution hitch with sway control. Here's my Tow rig and travel trailer setup. 

Jayco 25RB Hooked up to Silverado .jpg

TeamSaris Enthusiast

TeamSaris

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, OnTheReel said:

Seems he has his heart set on the LT Trail Boss; diesel isn’t available. 5.3 or 6.2, both with 10 speed and 3.23s.

 

Either one would be an upgrade from the 5.3 6 speed, but I’d go 6.2 or skip up to the HD if I was towing that a lot. 

I could be wrong but if you build a '21 on chevy.com, the only way to get the 10 speed is the 6.2   5.3/10spd seems to be GMC only for 21

TNTSierra Senior Enthusiast

TNTSierra

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Rodek said:

I have a 5.3 with 10 speed and pull a 6900 lbs loaded 30 ft Jayco 25RB  with the 3.23 gear with no issues at all. The 10 speed does indeed make a huge difference. I wanted the 5.3 because I didn't want to have to use the premium fuel GM says to use with the 6.2. I use a Recurve R3 weight distribution hitch with sway control. Here's my Tow rig and travel trailer setup. 

Jayco 25RB Hooked up to Silverado .jpg

I agree with you because my step dads new 20 Sierra with 5.3L and 10 spd is light years ahead of the K2 5.3L!  I have been greatly impressed with it and it’s performance. He is very satisfied and he is even coming from an Ecoboost. 

I had two K2 5.3Ls, one with a 6 spd and the other with a 8 spd, both were very sluggish, mostly because of the transmission programming that hindered the K2s. 
 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • tjonesdfw
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By tjonesdfw · Posted

      Whoever greenlighted the work truck matte black front bumpers on every trim but the AT4X should be fired!  I was hoping that was an AI mistake, but just realized they were on every model of the 2027 Silverado too.     Some parts of the interior do look premium, but the Denali Ultimate dashboard looks like an afterthought.  At least they appear to have lost the microfiber the high end Silverado models showed, but the '27 High Country dash looks better than the Denali.  
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      New member here. I am researching a read-first event-recorder concept for late-model GM V8 trucks. This is not a sales post. There is no product link, price, preorder, or mailing list. I am trying to determine whether the underlying problem is real before building anything.   Has your truck ever had a brief problem such as: - rough running or a momentary misfire - an oil-pressure warning or unusual pressure event - reduced power or a brief stall - a U-code or lost-communication problem - a symptom that disappeared before the dealer or independent shop could reproduce it   If so, I would appreciate the following details: - year, model, engine, and mileage - what happened and under what conditions - whether a DTC and useful freeze-frame data were stored - whether the shop was able to reproduce it - what the eventual confirmed repair was, if known - what additional information would have helped the diagnosis   The concept being evaluated is a removable leave-in recorder that continuously retains a rolling window from before and after an event. It would not tune, reflash, clear codes, or change the vehicle calibration.   I am also not claiming that it could predict lifter failure or see every internal ECM variable.   The real question is whether continuous event history would add enough useful evidence beyond freeze frame, GDS2, and existing scan tools — or whether it would simply be another unnecessary gadget.   For owners and technicians, which problem would make something like this genuinely useful: 1. intermittent misfire or AFM/DFM-related behavior 2. oil-pressure events 3. lost communication or electrical faults 4. none of the above Please be blunt. Negative feedback is just as useful as positive feedback.
    • Atlas
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Atlas · Posted

      No tears over the SLE and SLT trim levels disappearing but I kind of loathe the "Elevation" name. It's a truck--skip the elegance.   The slab-dashboard design is decidedly different. Almost has a Hummer flavor to it. "Professional Grade" seems to be leaning very white-collar, tech-driven these days moreso than blue-collar, functional design.   The Silverado would be my choice between the two new trucks. Pleased with the engine lineup in both. The GMC is a little "too much" for a truck, IMO, and the Denali borders on ridiculous - but I do know there are buyers for luxury trucks out there. It's just not my speed.
    • GMCustomerService
      Electrical problem

      By GMCustomerService · Posted

      Your safety is of utmost importance, @joshua1221, and we understand the importance of having all your lights working in your truck. If you have not already, we highly encourage you to bring your concerns to the attention of your local GM dealer. They are in the best position to diagnose your concerns as well as confirm the compatibility of the mirrors with your truck. Additionally, we would like the opportunity to explore any way we may be of assistance. When you have a moment, please visit: https://s.gm.com/support-request and fill out the support request form with all pertinent details. This form helps our team gather the right information and ensures your request is routed appropriately.
    • newdude
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By newdude · Posted

      - I like the outside but not as much as the Chevrolet.  They ICE'd the EV styling and it works, but I think exterior goes to Chevy on this one.     - SLE and SLT dead = Not.  Surprising.  Fits into the rest of the GMC lineup like this which (aside from Pro) matches the rest of the family.  Elevation, AT4, Denali.     - Interior.  Sophisticated Malaise era.  Why do I say Malaise?  Drawn with a ruler.  Rectangles everywhere.  Looks very premium though.    

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...