Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I bought this 2016 Silverado crew cab Z71 4X4 new and has 92K miles on it. I was driving on highway on cruise control and all of a sudden the RPM's went up just like it was in natural. I pulled over and the transmission was gone, took to dealership and they said I needed to replace it. The cost is going to be around 5K. This is crazy for this type of failure and GM should foot the bill or at least help.

Posted

There’s a reason they stopped doing 100k mile powertrain warranties. I would definitely shop around. The dealerships will always be quite a bit higher then the independent shops. Some will even offer some kind of warranty and you may even find one willing to finance if you can’t front the money now. Is this the 8 speed or the 6?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

$5,000 is really high for price to me.

 

Assuming you have a 6L80e, if my memory is right they are around $2,400-2,600ish for a reman GM transmission. Obviously you'd need to double check with your VIN and or the part number on the current transmission in the truck. Add a torque converter and some fluid and say we are at $3,000. I highly doubt R&R on a transmission is anywhere close to $2,000.

Posted (edited)

when these fail everything gets wiped out with metal debris.  here are the major fixes you need to update....

https://gearsmagazine.com/magazine/tackling-clutch-failure-in-the-gm-6l80-90/

 

look on ebay for a (2014-2016) 6L80 trans or the 8speed pre-2017, later Models are locked out and hard to swap,  i think Camaro might have some beefier internals and forged yoke. low milage unit should cost $1100 from wrecking yard.

Edited by flyingfool
Posted
On 1/8/2021 at 10:17 PM, flyingfool said:

when these fail everything gets wiped out with metal debris.  here are the major fixes you need to update....

https://gearsmagazine.com/magazine/tackling-clutch-failure-in-the-gm-6l80-90/

 

look on ebay for a (2014-2016) 6L80 trans or the 8speed pre-2017, later Models are locked out and hard to swap,  i think Camaro might have some beefier internals and forged yoke. low milage unit should cost $1100 from wrecking yard.

if you use the trans out of the camaro youll uave to change the entire tail housing to work with the 4wd and good luck finding one that cheap Ive searched high and low for good 6l80s with low mileage. im about to put the 6l80 out of TrkNrrs truck in my truck ive blown my trans twice truck only has 26xxx but has a turbo kit and i launch in 4x4 and to be fair i dont think it was completely fixed when i got it back from being rebuilt. 

  • 3 months later...
Posted
On 1/8/2021 at 2:38 PM, CamGTP said:

$5,000 is really high for price to me.

 

Assuming you have a 6L80e, if my memory is right they are around $2,400-2,600ish for a reman GM transmission. Obviously you'd need to double check with your VIN and or the part number on the current transmission in the truck. Add a torque converter and some fluid and say we are at $3,000. I highly doubt R&R on a transmission is anywhere close to $2,000.

 

Please help me... So, is a 2020 Ford F-150 with 6-speed auto more-reliable than GM 6L80e? What is the actual failure rate between the two? It sounds like to me that torque converter or total-failure is a common problem in 6L80e.

Posted

I have no idea. I'm sure the 6R80e has problems as well in the Fords. You'll need to do your own research on that stuff.

Posted
16 minutes ago, waltchan said:

It sounds like to me that torque converter or total-failure is a common problem in 6L80e.

Nope, it's not.  The 6L80 is a very reliable transmission when operated within its range of performance and with the fluid changed every 36-45K miles.  It has the potential to last even longer with a performance tune.

 

Are you seriously going to buy a vehicle based on the failure rate of a transmission???

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, swathdiver said:

Nope, it's not.  The 6L80 is a very reliable transmission when operated within its range of performance and with the fluid changed every 36-45K miles.  It has the potential to last even longer with a performance tune.

 

Are you seriously going to buy a vehicle based on the failure rate of a transmission???

 

Therein lies part of the problem. The owner’s manual the General provided with my 6L80E-equipped truck says to change the transmission fluid and filter every 100,000 miles. 

Posted
On 5/2/2021 at 1:59 AM, MaverickZ71 said:

 

Therein lies part of the problem. The owner’s manual the General provided with my 6L80E-equipped truck says to change the transmission fluid and filter every 100,000 miles. 

Well most folks don't think they need to follow the severe service schedule.  The 2016 owner's manual says to change the fluid at 45K miles under that schedule.  Had they followed that, chances are their transmissions would still be original.

  • Like 1
Posted

I agree with swathdiver.

Fluids are cheap insurance and people ignore them.

  • Like 3
Posted

Most forget about the transmission until it gives them issues.  Just not on their radar for the most part. 

 

To me most vehicles are driven in the severe category. 

 

One other fluid back in the day that was ignored was power steering fluid.  Mainly because it never had issues but to me that doesn't mean to ignore it either.  Now everything is going electric.

  • Like 3
Posted

If I took book could I get odds on how many times the 6L80E failure mode has been given a separate thread to be more than a dozen?

 🤔

 

Tow dozen?

:crackup:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

I change power steering fluid also.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,958
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    B07
    Newest Member
    B07
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 1 Anonymous, 859 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
    • Looking for this part for my truck. They don't sell just that one piece and to get it you have to pay over $100 even used for the whole air tube. The piece the hose clamp snaps into that is held on by the screw and nut. If anyone has access to one please let me know.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...