Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 8/9/2021 at 3:22 PM, Rhino83 said:

Cel was on for 2 days and then off. Drove all last week with no cel but made an appointment to have it checked out again. Dropped it off today and they are looking at replacing the ecm since they updated it last time, but truck is running fine. Still tripping the p0300 code so no changes there. Luckily got a loaner to drive which is a Buick envision lol but at least at not walking. Will update when I get the truck back and let you know what they did.

I have driven so many loaners I could be an expert on other vehicles not to buy. Lol the most comfy was the enterprise rental they had to get me - 21 Tahoe. The gmc 21 acadia was nice and sporty/peppy (v6) both way better than the envision and a smaller one I think. Truck has been in shop since last Tuesday. No update yet. Did hear from the head tech/ mechanic they are going to offer me an additional extended warranty for the motor. Not sure how long though. If it happens again after this time we are getting a lawyer. I will be done, sad but done!! I love the truck but can't drive something I don't trust. 

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
On 4/9/2021 at 6:01 PM, Leslie Politron said:

Hi. I bought a new 2021 AT4 March 5. 20 miles on it. Drove home from the dealer (4 miles) and the next time I turned it on, CEL and OnStar diagnostics emails me to take it to the service department. They say they reset MAP sensor and send me on my way. Later that day, same thing happens. I take it back in, they say MAP sensory needs replacing. They had it almost 2 weeks waiting on the part. After they replaced it, everything went fine for about 1200 miles and then I get blinking CEL for about 30 seconds then it stops. Next day, blinking CEL for a minute or so, and then it turns solid. I took it back to the dealer and they say the only code pulled was P0300 misfire. They have no idea what’s causing it, and quite frankly I’m pretty fed up at this point. They’ve had my new truck longer than I have in the month I’ve owned it. Has anyone had something similar happen?

098552EF-4C86-4348-A162-38FD4190B875.jpeg

I'm in the same boat as you. Same code and the first parts they changed were the lifters, only had 1600 miles on it. Now it's back in the shop and they don't know what the problem is. Just throwing parts at it. Very dissatisfied with the product and dealership won't swap it for a new one without paying at least 5000.00 more. Are you kidding me. May have to shame this dealer into a deal that works for me.

Posted

Latest update. Truck was in shop for 3.5 weeks. Think it was being used as a guinea pig by the GM engineers. App could not connect to it the whole time. Said there was something plugged into the diag port. Picked up today. Told to drive regardless of cel coming on. Per fm engineers. My karen(used to be a karen in her old days, not like the ones you see today but didn't take sh@t!) LOL we requested in writing that it was ok to drive with cel on. Denied. Told them we have lost faith in vehicle. I don't trust it if I have to travel for work. Mentioned buy back and lawyers. Got to see the dealership GM rep. Verbally agreed no issue if l

Cel comes back just keep them updated. Agreed. They are going to ask gm Corp to give us 72/100k for warranty. Plan b is if issue is still not resolved in a few months, vehicle swap basically. So we shall see how this goes. Just not looking forward to possibly getting lawyers engaged. Have me and the boss some piece of mind. As it stands we have had the truck in our possession 50%of the time since March. Want reviews on other vehicle models got me up. Acadia, numerous buicks, even a Tahoe that was an actual rental. Truck mfg date was last year so I think it was worked on by a mechanic building it with covid.  Lol truck is sick just like the world today! 

Posted

Sorry for the delay since my last post on August 9th.  Update as of August 24th.  When I took it in, on the 9th, they were discussing replacing the ECM or doing another update on the ECM.  Come to find out, did neither.  Was told the ECM update that was done was for 5.3 V8s without the 10 speed transmission and that GM was working on an updated ECM software for the 10 speeds.  Have not had a CEL since July 30th so fingers crossed my worries are over but still guarded.  I'm approaching 3K miles so we will see.  Service Tech even showed me the bulletin about the updated ECM software regarding 10 speed transmissions.

  • 5 weeks later...
Posted

[2021 GMC Sierra 1500 AT4 - 5.3L ECOTEC3 V8 W/DFM - currently @ ~3676 miles - purchase NEW this past May 30, 2021]

 

After the first CEL occurring within two weeks of purchase (see previous comment on page 1 blaming old winter grade fuel) I have driven this truck all summer long (having put premium gas in once or twice shortly after first servicing) with several trips to the beach (including 4wd on the beach) no issues ... but a second CEL occurred two weeks ago (first week of Sept) after a long idle in line for a child pickup after school. It disappeared on it's own a day or two later. Just had it serviced along with another issue where my passenger window would roll back down after I rolled it up. (Sidenote: I did get a base model 2018 Silverado as a loaner but I ended up getting the truck back same day. - Better loaners were promised me by the sales manager after some dealer errors on the purchase day. Not sure that Silverado qualifies, but I digress.)

 

Written on the service order was the following:

"... DTC P0300 with cylinder 1 & 6 misfire counter history at 130 and 232 misfire counter and number of other cylinder with small amount of misfire counter history"

 

Since the CEL was no longer on they also documented this:

 

"No misfire detected ... Recommend reprogram ECM with latest calibration and relearn crankshaft variation Doc ID#5869744"

 

I don't seem to be getting the quite the same feedback from the technicians as some of the others here, not sure if that means they are being coached to not say it but I guess I'll see how long this "fix" will last.

  • 9 months later...
Posted

Took my 20 AT4 to service dept due to heavy stuttering.  Said that’s what the 10speed tranny does.  I said yeah til it gets me killed in traffic.  Took back a 2nd time and they want to replace the ECM.  But it’s on back order with no eta and they won’t give me a loaner.  Only 20k miles.  Really frustrating!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 286,740 Mile Services   8/6/2026   New AC Compressor. Refrigerant oil and dye, evacuate and charge system.  New exhaust system from cat back.  New Iridium plugs plus replace #3 coil Repair/rewire headlamp wiring (passenger side) and replace all forward bulbs. Polish lenses of both assemblies.  Pull rear rotors, clean and adjust parking assembly. Inspect, clean and grease front calipers. Check pads and shoes.  4 wheel power bleed of brake system. Dot 4 Reset idle speed 50 rpm higher New Serpentine belt.    Will need new pads in the rear in about 5K more miles.    Tax Title and License out the door just short of a grand.    AC clutch had bitten the dust. 1 year warranty on the pick and save replacement. Thing will make a Polar Bear cry Uncle.  He spent quite some time on the wiring. It was in the harness and he does nothing half. I got off cheap. I have considerable more light down the road. Sylvania Silver Star replacements.  Gas seal between the porcelain and shell of plug #3 was blown, cooked the coil. That was the cold miss.  Love the new exhaust. I can sneak into the neighborhood again.  Nice to have a working parking brake again. Belle Tire never got it done. That was disappointing.    This was one of her bigger bills and still way cheaper than a payment even given the oil consumption. This thing cost me under a hundred a month in repairs and normal routine costs. What is my incentive to replace it? 🤔           
    • hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...