Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, TNTSilverado said:

My step dad got the 5.3L and 10 speed combo in his SLT and absolutely loves it. I can say it’s so much better than my 2016 and 2017 Sierra SLT 5.3L in the K2s.  I didn’t know Chevy Silverado didn’t offer the 10 speed with the 5.3L. Is that GMC exclusive??

 

and yes the 8 speed was junk in my 2017 with the 5.3L and the 2018 with the 6.2L. It clunked and jarred all the time. 

When i purchased my 2019 sierra AT4 you could only get the 10 speed with the 6.2 and the 5.3 was 8 speed and i think (not 100% sure) 6 speed. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Snakes709 said:

Im in edmonton alberta. Gas just went up and havent seen what premium is at right now but it was 113.9/L and 94 was 146.9. Works out to about $30 canadian. 87 just jumped to 131.9, sometimes premium doesnt go up when regular does. 

Gotcha!  Ya I’m in the USA, so a little different. Thanks 

Posted
1 minute ago, Snakes709 said:

When i purchased my 2019 sierra AT4 you could only get the 10 speed with the 6.2 and the 5.3 was 8 speed and i think (not 100% sure) 6 speed. 

Ugh. That stinks. Ya his is a 2020 SLT and I drove it and was so impressed with how much crisper the throttle response was and the acceleration compared to my K2 trucks. It is truly a night and day difference. 

Posted

Yeah, they expanded 10 speed availability, but not until 2020. Chevy gets it in the 5.3 LT TB and 5.3 HC. GMC you can get the 5.3 10 speed in all but the poverty trim. But things have been a little sketchy with all the supplier issues. A lot of the 5.3 trucks that were supposed to 10 speed got stuck with the 8 and a $200 credit. What a deal. 🙃

Posted
4 hours ago, TNTSilverado said:

This is so true!!!  If someone is seriously worried about the $5 to $10 in savings on each fill-up then they shouldn’t be buying the truck with the 6.2L engine or the truck costing over $50k+ in the first place. I have only put 89 in my truck once because I screwed up and didn’t fill up in a bigger city and got caught in a small town with no premium. Truck ran fine but I didn’t beat on it or race it while I had lower grade in it. It’s a just a piece of mind knowing, I wanted the 6.2L with all its power…..I USE PREMIUM! 

So, perhaps if we all spent 50-60k on our trucks then we should ONLY buy the most expensive tires, wiper blades fuzzy dice and US made replacement windshields as well.

Point being if it made any real difference on a daily basis then perhaps everyone would buy premium or 87 octane.

The 6-8 bucks per tank most likely won't kill anyone on here, but it is stated by the manufacturer that you CAN use 87 without any issues so why not let the owners of each truck decide what they want to use?

The op's question I believe was could you use 87 or not, not everyones' opinion on what an idiot or cheap sob they are for choosing one product over the other.

Just my thoughts as I can burn either and it doesn't matter much to me, I have felt no whopping performance difference running one over the other however I am not racing light to light or doing LSR races at Bonneville either.

Perhaps we should all purchase a horse and execute it so we can take turns beating it at this point.?

 

  • Haha 1
Posted

Most trucks I’ve bought I put tunes in requiring premium fuel. My last had the E-85 option. I put reg fuel on trips and E-85 in town. Best of both worlds. Now I have a truck for in town. And a car for trips. 15 mpg in town 30 on trips. 

Posted

When I visit my Dad in Iowa 93 cost a dime more than 87. In Illinois it's nearly a dollar more. In Iowa I'd use 93 in Illinois 87. Unless I was towing or pulling stumps of course but running straight down the road....30hp is 30 hp. Combustion controls on motors today would have been the envy of every little boy in the 60's. Look Ma...I don't have to find a SUNOCO or drive to the airport for fuel!! Use it when you need it. Don't pay for it when you don't. Unless sensibility is no longer fashionable. 

Posted

Have trouble seeing the sensibility in saving $5 a tank after spending 60 grand on a truck with the largest engine option that you use to get groceries. 
 

Talk about closing the barn door after the cows got out. The big money is already spent, so enjoy it and get what you paid extra for.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

When I visit my Dad in Iowa 93 cost a dime more than 87. In Illinois it's nearly a dollar more. In Iowa I'd use 93 in Illinois 87. Unless I was towing or pulling stumps of course but running straight down the road....30hp is 30 hp. Combustion controls on motors today would have been the envy of every little boy in the 60's. Look Ma...I don't have to find a SUNOCO or drive to the airport for fuel!! Use it when you need it. Don't pay for it when you don't. Unless sensibility is no longer fashionable. 

How can the cost be so different? Because they can.

If I'm getting screwed, I like to be kissed! 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
12 hours ago, Robby James said:

So, perhaps if we all spent 50-60k on our trucks then we should ONLY buy the most expensive tires, wiper blades fuzzy dice and US made replacement windshields as well.

Point being if it made any real difference on a daily basis then perhaps everyone would buy premium or 87 octane.

The 6-8 bucks per tank most likely won't kill anyone on here, but it is stated by the manufacturer that you CAN use 87 without any issues so why not let the owners of each truck decide what they want to use?

The op's question I believe was could you use 87 or not, not everyones' opinion on what an idiot or cheap sob they are for choosing one product over the other.

Just my thoughts as I can burn either and it doesn't matter much to me, I have felt no whopping performance difference running one over the other however I am not racing light to light or doing LSR races at Bonneville either.

Perhaps we should all purchase a horse and execute it so we can take turns beating it at this point.?

 

Looks like we struck a nerve with this one!?!  You go ahead and choose whatever gas you want little fella. I’m just stating GM knows more than you or I and that I want the best performance out of the truck without ever having to worry about it knocking. Hence, that’s why they state it can run on 87 but “IF” it starts knocking switch fuel.  There is a reason they put this. Remember it is a performance engine that’s in the corvette and camaro!!  That’s why I choose premium fuel. If Cost cutting a few bucks is your proghtive, then by all means do so. As for telling YOU or anyone else what to buy for your truck. That’s your call and your money, but I’m not a penny pusher!  I buy the best, because I want it to last. Plain and simple

 

Good day

  • Like 1
Posted

Maybe next week someone will spend $3000 extra on a Trail Boss and then ask about lowering it 2” to increase MPG. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, OnTheReel said:

Maybe next week someone will spend $3000 extra on a Trail Boss and then ask about lowering it 2” to increase MPG. 

LMFAO!  So true! 

Posted
42 minutes ago, TNTSilverado said:

LMFAO!  So true! 

 

1 hour ago, TNTSilverado said:

Looks like we struck a nerve with this one!?!  You go ahead and choose whatever gas you want little fella. I’m just stating GM knows more than you or I and that I want the best performance out of the truck without ever having to worry about it knocking. Hence, that’s why they state it can run on 87 but “IF” it starts knocking switch fuel.  There is a reason they put this. Remember it is a performance engine that’s in the corvette and camaro!!  That’s why I choose premium fuel. If Cost cutting a few bucks is your proghtive, then by all means do so. As for telling YOU or anyone else what to buy for your truck. That’s your call and your money, but I’m not a penny pusher!  I buy the best, because I want it to last. Plain and simple

 

Good day

I believe the term you are looking for is "penny pincher" ...lol

And the other word in the English language that you are struggling with is "Prerogative"

Where in that shrunken brain of yours did you come up with "Little Fella"?

Intelligent rapport is obviously beyond your abilities and a public forum is perhaps not the best place to display this as if you remain silent the World can question your intelligence, but when you speak (or type in this case) you expose yourself to everyone😀

I am certainly not in any position to pinch pennies nor will I ever be, if you actually had read my posts you could perhaps with someone explaining them to you what I was saying, The OP asked a question and I gave the correct answer to his question, your contribution to the thread was negligible at best.

Ohhh here you go this will help you out.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/negligible

Perhaps we can get back on track now?

 

Posted

Talk about closing the barn door after the cows got out. 

 

Damn, now I know what I did wrong😬

 

So, has the OP come back to check out the "answer" to his question? This bad boy is becoming a novel!

  • Haha 3
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, OnTheReel said:

Maybe next week someone will spend $3000 extra on a Trail Boss and then ask about lowering it 2” to increase MPG. 

I mean i have a AT4 and im installing bilstein 5100 for a base sierra to lower it 2”. If i get better fuel economy, bonus. But main reason im doing it so its easier getting in/out with my back injury and so i can load/unload my motorbike without bottoming out on my ramps. Plus i hate how the ass end bounces around. I am curious though what kind of fuel economy changes ill see (if any)

Edited by Snakes709

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have thought an EV might have some practical value in extending the life of the ICE members of ones fleet. Now....I'm convinced of it. I've been letting my better half access Raven (Mitsubishi Mirage) for her needs while Dizzy has been in the shop. Being the fuel freak I am and given the fact Raven is capable of over 60 mpg in clean air on a warm day I was taken back by the wife's ability to take a car that had used a half a tank of gas that to that point had returned a value of 57 mpg and return in with a decimating 51 mpg for that same tank in that same day in a 15 mile round trip of short hop errands and a stop in the drive through at Micky D's.  😱   Trust me on this. It would take the remainder of that tank driven on the highway to return that tank to just 54 mpg. This is not a Mitsubishi issue. This is an ICE issue that is magnified in vehicles capable of such high fuel economy values. On a percentage basis your 1500 does the same thing. Short hopping an ICE consumes a good deal more fuel and in doing so provides zero additional useable outputs. That entire volume of fuel is wasted in diluting the cylinder walls oil films, creating crankcase moisture and acid content and the resultant wear.    Enter the SLATE. All of that is avoided and the ICE's advantage in range and made useful at reduced wear for your ICE!   Kind'a cool. 
    • Back in the day people would buy cars based on performance. The charger posted does 0-60 in 3.3 seconds. And it’s fully loaded.  It has a decent warranty and will fit most anyone’s needs. Remember the original Hemi? 90 day warranty. 25K mini truck or that car? I’d go with the car. It wouldn’t fit my perimeter. If I could just talk my wife out of her Genesis. It would be perfect for her.
    • Let's pivot this back. Someone said they wanted pictures.   Even better, there's already video. Pre-prod prototypes are already on the road and they're letting the press drive them.   JerryRigEverything did a good review. I really enjoy his content and EV adventures, so I was thrilled when he had the chance to review a Slate:    
    • The Charger EV was stillborn. Wrong car at the wrong price for Dodge's intended audience. Now at a good price with fire-sale discounts, and still not selling, it's still very much the wrong car. Again, Dodge's intended audience. I believe a lot of Stellantis' EV blunders were all under Tavares' regime at Stellantis...the board convinced him to move on. Neat car, just wasn't received on the level that would sustain mass production.   Dodge is headed in a better direction for its core business. I didn't think there was anything left to get excited about re: the Durango after its 15 year run, but they're just now releasing a 392 version that should price out in the low 40's. Nicely done. I'm not sure I would touch anything Stellantis makes with a 10' pole these days, but the Durango is still mostly parts designed like 3 parent companies ago so maybe it's still OK?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...