Jump to content

6.2 engine fuel

Bherm

By Bherm
in Troubleshooting, Warranty & Recalls

 Share

Recommended Posts

M1ck3y Senior Enthusiast

M1ck3y

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, Supreme Pizza said:

All I can say about octane is that you must use at least the minimum octane rating recommended by the manufacturer.

 

So why does it always say "minimum octane rating". Well, because more is OK, less is death.

 

Higher octane doesn't make a car faster, but higher octane is required by faster cars.

 

More octane = less volatile fuel.

 

You can raise your octane rating by diluting your fuel with a less volatile fuel, like kerosene.

 

High octane fuel should be cheaper than low octane fuel. But its not. Because people that need high octane fuel have more money. And because people think paying more for fuel will get you better fuel.

 

If the fuel is "too combustible", then it will ignite before the spark happens. That is called pre-ignition, spark knock, or detonation.  High compression engines have issues with pre-ignition, so they use higher octane fuel, so that the gas wont "blow up" before its supposed to during the compression cycle. Its counter-intuitive, but lower grade (deluted) fuel works better for higher compression engines. I see people put "octane booster" or "premium gas" in their crappy cars, hoping it will make them faster or more reliable. Doesn't work that way. You want to use the minimum octane fuel that is acceptable for your engine. Low octane fuel is more powerful than high octane fuel.

 

 

BLOG06_180419780_AR_0_UQSWVLQCCQFO.jpg

 

RCF71 Enthusiast

RCF71

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 12/21/2021 at 2:07 AM, Supreme Pizza said:

All I can say about octane is that you must use at least the minimum octane rating recommended by the manufacturer.

 

So why does it always say "minimum octane rating". Well, because more is OK, less is death.

 

Higher octane doesn't make a car faster, but higher octane is required by faster cars.

 

More octane = less volatile fuel.

 

You can raise your octane rating by diluting your fuel with a less volatile fuel, like kerosene.

 

High octane fuel should be cheaper than low octane fuel. But its not. Because people that need high octane fuel have more money. And because people think paying more for fuel will get you better fuel.

 

If the fuel is "too combustible", then it will ignite before the spark happens. That is called pre-ignition, spark knock, or detonation.  High compression engines have issues with pre-ignition, so they use higher octane fuel, so that the gas wont "blow up" before its supposed to during the compression cycle. Its counter-intuitive, but lower grade (deluted) fuel works better for higher compression engines. I see people put "octane booster" or "premium gas" in their crappy cars, hoping it will make them faster or more reliable. Doesn't work that way. You want to use the minimum octane fuel that is acceptable for your engine. Low octane fuel is more powerful than high octane fuel.

 

 

BLOG06_180419780_AR_0_UQSWVLQCCQFO.jpg


All of that bolded info is incorrect.

Edited by RCF71
Accuracy
  • Like 1
Supreme Pizza Senior Enthusiast

Supreme Pizza

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, RCF71 said:


All of that bolded info is incorrect.

 

 

 "I see people put "octane booster" or "premium gas" in their crappy cars, hoping it will make them faster or more reliable."

 

How is this statement incorrect in any way? And how would you be able to determine if I have seen people pour octane booster into their Geo Metro, while they were bragging about how much faster it makes their car?

 

Anyway,

 

I would suggest that people do their own research and choose the option that they feel is best. Especially when its something as important as using the correct octane, diet, medical treatments, vehicle to purchase, the best brand of refrigerator, etc.

 

Read the forums, talk to the experts, research all the available information, and draw your own conclusions. Facts and opinions can be a grey area. Interpretation can be a factor as well.

 

Even if one direction is the "correct direction" for most, its not going to be ideal for all.

 

Don't follow anyone's advice, but rather use that advise in combination with your other sources of information in order to make the decision that you feel will suit your needs the best.

RCF71 Enthusiast

RCF71

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, Supreme Pizza said:

 

 

 "I see people put "octane booster" or "premium gas" in their crappy cars, hoping it will make them faster or more reliable."

 

How is this statement incorrect in any way? And how would you be able to determine if I have seen people pour octane booster into their Geo Metro, while they were bragging about how much faster it makes their car?

Ok, fixed it.


A few notes:

 

- octane and volatility are not correlated, octane has more to do with the chemical structure of each molecule, not its size (which is what most affects volatility)

- higher octane fuel is definitely not cheaper to produce, refineries have processing units that cost 100’s of millions of dollars to convert low octane molecules into higher octane molecules… why should higher octane fuel be cheaper?

- lower octane is not “more combustible”, it simply has a lower activation energy - combustion is a chemical reaction, and all reactions need a certain amount of energy to start/continue

- “diluted” fuel is not better for high compression engines, unless you are “diluting” the gasoline portion with an additive that has much higher octane (ethanol, methanol, mtbe, etc)

- lower octane fuel may or may not have more energy than higher octane fuel, again, not directly correlated.  In the case of ethanol addition to raise octane, it is true that the energy content is lowered (ethanol has approx. 30% lower energy content than typical gasoline)

- do not put kerosene in your gasoline, it will not burn completely and will leave you with carbon deposits (at best, because it will not vaporize and mix thoroughly), but kerosene can go into diesel to lower power pour point/prevent gelling

 

 

Edited by RCF71
  • Like 1
TJay74 Senior Enthusiast

TJay74

Posted
Posted

To reinforce what RCF71 just said:

Lower octane fuel burns faster, but doesnt produce more BTU's (energy) than higher octane fuel. The speed of the burn from the octane is what can cause the issue when used in a engine that has a high compression ration.

The sound of detonation or knock is caused when pre-ignition happens. As the fuel-air mix is pushed into the combustion chamber and is compressed the leading edges of the valve or the valve reliefs on the pistons can be hot enough they ignite the fuel-air mix before the top of the compression cycle and before the spark plug actually fires to ignite the fuel-air mix. This causes an issue due to when the hot spot in the chamber ignites the fuel-air mix it starts a flame front (propagation) to race across the combustion chamber. As the flame front is racing across the chamber the spark plug then ignites the mix as well, now you have 2 different flame fronts traveling across the chamber towards each other at the speed of sound. When they collide the cause the audible "knock" or pinging that we hear. This also can cause damage of the knock is severe enough, when inspected the tops of the pistons will have marks on them similar to if you hit the piston top with a ball peen hammer.

The way you control this is with a higher octane fuel that burns slower and resists pre-ignition, this allows the spark plug to do its job and to ignite the fuel-air mix with a single spark source.

M1ck3y Senior Enthusiast

M1ck3y

Posted
Posted (edited)
57 minutes ago, TJay74 said:

To reinforce what RCF71 just said:

Lower octane fuel burns faster, but doesnt produce more BTU's (energy) than higher octane fuel. The speed of the burn from the octane is what can cause the issue when used in a engine that has a high compression ration.

The sound of detonation or knock is caused when pre-ignition happens. As the fuel-air mix is pushed into the combustion chamber and is compressed the leading edges of the valve or the valve reliefs on the pistons can be hot enough they ignite the fuel-air mix before the top of the compression cycle and before the spark plug actually fires to ignite the fuel-air mix. This causes an issue due to when the hot spot in the chamber ignites the fuel-air mix it starts a flame front (propagation) to race across the combustion chamber. As the flame front is racing across the chamber the spark plug then ignites the mix as well, now you have 2 different flame fronts traveling across the chamber towards each other at the speed of sound. When they collide the cause the audible "knock" or pinging that we hear. This also can cause damage of the knock is severe enough, when inspected the tops of the pistons will have marks on them similar to if you hit the piston top with a ball peen hammer.

The way you control this is with a higher octane fuel that burns slower and resists pre-ignition, this allows the spark plug to do its job and to ignite the fuel-air mix with a single spark source.

 

You shouldn't state that low octane fuel burns faster. It's entirely dependent on the composition of the fuel. Some of the highest octane fuels are also some of the fastest burning. Resistance to pre-ignition is the purpose of high octane. Burn speed really only becomes a factor when you have a high reving, high strung engine and you require a faster burn speed at high rpm's. Tuning is also a big factor here. Adjustments in timing can be made to accommodate the fuel's burn speed; making as much, or even more power then the slower burning fuel. Or vice versa for that matter..

Edited by M1ck3y
TJay74 Senior Enthusiast

TJay74

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, M1ck3y said:

 

You shouldn't state that low octane fuel burns faster. It's entirely dependent on the composition of the fuel. Some of the highest octane fuels are also some of the fastest burning. Resistance to pre-ignition is the purpose of high octane. Burn speed really only becomes a factor when you have a high reving, high strung engine and you require a faster burn speed at high rpm's. Tuning is also a big factor here. Adjustments in timing can be made to accommodate the fuel's burn speed; making as much, or even more power then the slower burning fuel. Or vice versa for that matter..

 

 

This was a very basic run down, once you get into oxygenated fuels you get into a whole new type of conversation.

TJay74 Senior Enthusiast

TJay74

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, swathdiver said:

I wonder how many folks know that ethanol is used to reduce spark knock these days?

 

Ethanol is a cheap and amazing way to get rid of knock. My 2016 6.2/A8 has been on E85 for 4 years now, it runs great. Even still if a person only has 91 they can add up to E10 with no harm. If the trucks tank is 26 gallons that means you can easily add 2.5-3 gallons of E85 to the 91, it will help with detonation and make the truck run better as well.

  • Thanks 1
GullLakeMi Enthusiast

GullLakeMi

Posted
Posted

I had a '16 with 6.2L and 8 speed.  Damn 8 speed was so clunky I often ran 87 octane.  Why the hell not.  Shitty transmission didn't deserve any better.  It's only $3k for the 6.2L.  Sold it after 5 years to CarMax for nearly what I paid for it excluding sales tax.

 

Don't see the reason to pamper a full-size truck when they consistently are at bottom of any reliability rating anyway.

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • Grumpy Bear
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • Tyler Gibbs
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Tyler Gibbs · Posted

      It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
    • Tyler Gibbs
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Tyler Gibbs · Posted

      They’re not the same wiz as 10-15 years ago.  QC has fallen pretty hard.  The XP line was never good though in the first place.    https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/wix-filter-rusted-through.386492/post-6991372   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/i-ve-used-my-last-wix-filter.27299/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/looking-for-a-better-replacement-for-wix-51258.403977/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/convince-me-in-using-the-purolator-boss.401537/post-7420147   the forums are littered with posts and examples of not great wix filters the last couple years 
    • Atlas
      Joke Thread

      By Atlas · Posted

      *Your      

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...