Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, rav3 said:

Can you explain what & how this "coating" would do or not do, relative to the issue of the original post. I just need to be educated on it.

 

The LT1's main rod bearings/connecting rod bearings are polymer coated for increased fatigue strength and durability over the Gen IV aluminum bimetal bearings.

 

Reduced friction, reduced heat, increased strength, smooth, stronger power delivery.

 

I just can't figure out why they would advertise this in the lt1 but not the l86. If they do have the same internals..

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
12 minutes ago, M1ck3y said:

 

The LT1's main rod bearings/connecting rod bearings are polymer coated for increased fatigue strength and durability over the Gen IV aluminum bimetal bearings.

 

Reduced friction, reduced heat, increased strength, smooth, stronger power delivery.

 

I just can't figure out why they would advertise this in the lt1 but not the l86. If they do have the same internals..

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks...very interesting. Here's a link explaining it more

https://redirect.viglink.com/?format=go&jsonp=vglnk_164029083366812&key=5e9e33f20bf41d5a669cc4838c2690e9&libId=kxjekwjt01000b28000MLat47xr5l&loc=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.corvetteforum.com%2Fforums%2Fc7-tech-performance%2F3504021-lt1-main-bearings.html&ccpaConsent=1---&v=1&opt=true&out=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pvd-coatings.co.uk%2Fapplications%2Fautomotive%2F&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F&title=LT1 Main Bearings - CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion&txt=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pvd-coatings.co.uk%2Fapplications%2Fautomotive%2F

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On 12/22/2021 at 7:39 AM, voided3 said:

I was wondering when this would finally happen. The lifters on our '21 Silverado failed at 585 miles and they only replaced them in two cylinders, so I personally am really hoping this is will be a recall for a total replacement with upgraded parts.

It's only a matter of time and it will happen again.  My 2021 Silverado happened at 2990 miles and 12,000 miles.   Their policy was to fix the 4 on the side it broke on, so you got screwed there.  Now their policy is under 6k or 8k miles like us, you fix all 8.   So we both got screwed.   Now im reading in the lawsuit that they replaced the lifters with equally defected parts (i'm hoping thats on the older models and older fixes, and their lifter part from March 2021 is a functional working product) otherwise we all got screwed 3x over.  To make matters worst, GM customer care is better known as GM i dont give a F about the customer, who won't reimburse jack for your inconveniences or finding you a substitute vehicle while they backorder your parts

  • 1 year later...
Posted
On 12/21/2021 at 10:02 PM, Grumpy Bear said:

Anyone ever wonder why the lifters in a 4.3 Ecotec3 are problem free?

They are the same lifters used in the failed motors. 

🤔

It's happening to 4.3s, my 2015 Chevy Silverado 1500 4.3 is suffering this right now. I'm trying to get my name on the recall list.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
5 hours ago, CDLinc said:

It's happening to 4.3s, my 2015 Chevy Silverado 1500 4.3 is suffering this right now. I'm trying to get my name on the recall list.

 

Congratulations! You're the first I've heard to have this issue with a 4.3. 

Posted

I just had my engine rebuilt due to a NON-DOD lifter detonating. all the DOD lifters looked fine after 125000 miles.  did a delete setup.  

  • Sad 1
Posted
On 12/21/2021 at 7:53 PM, Truckboattruck said:

https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2021/gm-lifter-recall-class-action-lawsuit.shtml?fbclid=IwAR36-MEw155HlTRcl-tRqgfwQ8gK_eiCj7Z9t2yjhRIYymJS2IYrkvily7k

Long and short of it: 

"(...)GM class action lawsuit alleges the lifters malfunction and prematurely fail because of multiple reasons.


The lifters (including the locking pin) allegedly do not conform to design specifications, are installed in an incorrect position in the lifter guide and/or are made of sub-standard materials.

 

GM also allegedly didn't consider the expansion and contraction rates of the lifters and the engine block, and the bores in which the lifters are inserted have widths that allegedly do not allow for the necessary clearance of the lifter to move freely, which damages the lifters.

 

A GM lifter recall should also allegedly be ordered because the automaker allegedly 'failed to account for the amount of increased pressure to which the AFM lifters are exposed by the pressurized oil used to operate the lifters, causing them to fail prematurely.'

 

The plaintiffs further claim more valve train maintenance is needed, more than is advised in GM's maintenance guides. This allegedly includes, 'more frequent oil changes, engine flushing and cleaning and/or replacing the valve lifter oil manifold and its filter at regular intervals.'


According to the class action lawsuit, GM allegedly replaces the defective parts with equally defective parts that continue to fail and cause a ticking noise from the engine."

 


Personally I am indifferent, I have not had lifter issues myself. I'll also probably be done with a DOD delete before anything comes of this. 

Here we go again, sending the bottom feeder's kids through school, paying for their European vacations, making our cars thousands of dollars more expensive and waiting for your $3.52 settlement check.

 

If y'all didn't vote for the effeminate, Washington wouldn't be messing with the automakers and their would be no cylinder de-activation.  

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, swathdiver said:

Here we go again, sending the bottom feeder's kids through school, paying for their European vacations, making our cars thousands of dollars more expensive and waiting for your $3.52 settlement check.

 

If y'all didn't vote for the effeminate, Washington wouldn't be messing with the automakers and their would be no cylinder de-activation.  

Mary Barra takes great offense to that.

Edited by BlaineBug
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, BlaineBug said:

Mary Becerra takes great offense to that.

Don't like her neither, she's more into politics than cars.

Posted
Just now, swathdiver said:

Don't like her neither, she's more into politics than cars.

She was put in that position back before we understood what ESG scores were let alone that they even existed in the first place.  Now I know why.

  • Like 1
Posted

She’s at home enjoying a bud light wondering how to get us to go electric faster. Contemplating what kind of job China going to give her as a reward for all the business she sent their way. After talking to Joe I’m sure she knows. Meanwhile the people over at Kia-Hyundai headquarters are wondering. How stupid can those people running the big three be? 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
57 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

She’s at home enjoying a bud light wondering how to get us to go electric faster. Contemplating what kind of job China going to give her as a reward for all the business she sent their way. After talking to Joe I’m sure she knows. Meanwhile the people over at Kia-Hyundai headquarters are wondering. How stupid can those people running the big three be? 

All of the "fortune 500" companies are fully invested in it.

Posted
2 hours ago, BlaineBug said:

All of the "fortune 500" companies are fully invested in it.

Some are sticking their toe in. Genesis and Hyundai-Kia are making companion models along with gas models. Toyota is perfecting hybrids. The general public are resisting, it’s a hassle. 

Posted
14 hours ago, KARNUT said:

She’s at home enjoying a bud light wondering how to get us to go electric faster. Contemplating what kind of job China going to give her as a reward for all the business she sent their way. After talking to Joe I’m sure she knows. Meanwhile the people over at Kia-Hyundai headquarters are wondering. How stupid can those people running the big three be? 

Oh, ******, are we really gonna turn this forum into a political tit-for-tat?
If so, I'm just gonna see the door on my way out and softly close it behind me.

  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Wawa and Meijer here have ethanol free (88 & 89) I use for my mower and lawn equipment.  Its not much more than reg.  I paid $3.29 a few weeks ago.  
    • tl; dr I've now reached the 6th floor of hell. I'm chronicling my journey for my morning readers.   Pulling the top of the intake apart was moderately easy but it involved a lot of parts, connections, and minutae. I was preparing for the new fuel lines to arrive ("nut and bolt kit" it's called). The fuel line connections are notched and held in place by the manifold and a metal plate with a T27 screw.   It's on the back of the intake, under the firewall, with little clearance, and two hard metal fuel lines in the way. I was using Franken-tools (weird combinations of 1/4 inch ratchet with/without an extension, with a bit holder for my T27) to get in there. One of my sockets and bits fell off and has yet to emerge on the floor. I lost a second setup and that's when I almost started throwing tools. But that was the point at which I had gotten traction on the Torx head, and it promptly stripped. No more traction.   I started humming "1-877-kars-4-kids" because I was about at that point. You know what? I'm $1500 into this thing and I can make it disappear just as quickly. This isn't fun anymore. I had spent a lot of time already "tidying" around the engine bay: Fixing all the "someone's been here before!" BS. The truck has been exclusively dealer- and shop- serviced and I'm reminded of why I never let other people work on my cars unless absolutely necessary.   Speaking of dealer service. This truck has a 1" stack of records going back to 1995. I put them all in an excel spreadsheet, date/mileage/description.   The CPI spider has been replaced 4 times in 85k miles. The EGR? Another 4. Multiple, multiple O2 sensors. One Cat. 4? Sets of plugs and wires, and I swear half the stack is diagnosis paperwork for "misfire, runs rough, extended crank, dies at stoplights".   GM was producing some proper crap back then. And it was still well within the era of brittle/crappy plastic. (Windows 95 was released the same month this truck was sold new, we HAD the technology!!)   There (was) a plastic shroud around the evaporator core and HVAC fan in the engine bay. I noticed a chunk of it missing so I poked at it some more and it literally shattered. Touched it some more and pieces were crumbling off. Had a good laugh. Clearly whatever plastic garbage they were using had broken down over 30 years and was literally turning to dust. That was a good half hour of using a shop vac to remove the rest of it.   Back to it.   I was going to give up for the evening but then decided I'm already level 10 pissed off at the stripped screw: G* D* it, give me my tools back -- and my JOY. We'll do this the hard way: The whole intake is coming off.   Blazer won Round II. After finally finding and accessing the 12 intake bolts and using a pry bar to unseat it from the heads, it popped loose in an explosion of gunk and grime raining down into open ports. Awesome.   6 times I reminded myself: Be careful of the temperature sender on the front of the intake.   YEAH, I forgot again and snapped it clean off in the removal. Add another $20 to the ever-growing list of new parts this thing is consuming.   The shame is, long before removing the intake, I had changed the oil in prep for Tuesday's momentous fuel line replacement that was going to be the magic fix and I'd have a running Blazer to tool around in this next weekend. The intake removal, including raining gunk, also gushed dirty coolant all over the valley. Of course it did. Welp, there goes another $35.   I now need an intake gasket set, bolt set, coolant temp sensor, another 5 quarts of oil, some RTV. Don't worry, I've already got 3 new jugs of Dexcool and a thermostat waiting. I'll fill it with clean water first to get it running, dump it, and then add the Dex later on in case... well, let's not go there. I'm only tearing this down once, next time the truck is going on Marketplace for FREE.   Oh, and I'm going to need vacuum hose for all the stupid connections placed at the rear of the engine which have since disintegrated. Come on, GM....tell me you don't do that anymore?   Oh, and the ears on the distributor where the cap screws down are both cracked. I mean, why not put a new distributor in it too. You get a distributor, YOU get a distributor, Everyone gets a new distributor!   This truck isn't out of the woods yet...I'm already questioning how much more time I'm willing to sink in.
    • NewDude, thank you for the suggestions!    I did follow up and the dealer indicates he has an open CX case and is working with DPAC (Dealer Parts Assistance Center).   Per the dealer, GM has had a quality spill and is not providing an update for when a replacement engine will be available.
    • That's interesting.   There was a factory wire-hole in the back, top of the rear cab, which had a wire for the third brakelight assembly running through it, as well as several holes (10 of them I believe) for all of the studs coming off of the 3rd brakelight assembly itself.   I sealed all of those holes with RTV/silicone as well.   I found it kind of odd, that none of those holes, were sealed with any kind of sealant by the factory - if there was any there, it wasn't very much.   That said, I've been out in heavy rain and have ran the truck through high-pressure car-washes a few times now and she has been 100% water-tight to this point.   I feel very confident in the repair, we'll see how it holds up.
    • I bought a used 2022 2500hd with 6.6L in February. In March took a 2200 mile trip towing our 6500 lb trailer. Changed the oil day before leaving and when we were arriving at our 1st destination, low oil light came on (roughly 1000 miles) it was 2 qts low. Now it towed like a dream, no issue there, and we did go through the mountains of TN, but still, 2 qts! Luckily I did purchase an extended warranty. Brought it to the dealership in April, oil change and consumption test. Brought it back last week, 1300 miles, no towing, and no oil showing on the dipstick. GM is reccomending a new engine (cheaper than them rebuilding), we'll see if the warranty company comes through. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...