Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
14 hours ago, Nutmeg said:

Since I have a factory disabled 5.3 that makes me feel better. Previous was a 08 5.3 AFM that I traded at 100k that never had an issue.

Question on the bad batch of lifters. Are the Sept 2020 to March 2021 engine dates or vehicle completion dates?

 

 

Lifter production dates.  GM had to special return lifters in stock in the date code range, they had a special return on crate engines and VLOM kits as well.  

Posted (edited)
On 1/19/2022 at 7:53 AM, newdude said:

 

 

Lifter production dates.  GM had to special return lifters in stock in the date code range, they had a special return on crate engines and VLOM kits as well.  

So if you had a build date of 3/21/21 you would be in the (bad lifter range)I would guess the motor was built at least a few weeks+  before build date?

 

Update:  So my engine build date is Feb 25 21

 

IMG_5336.jpeg

Edited by WeGone
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, WeGone said:

So if you had a build date of 3/21/21 you would be in the (bad lifter range)I would guess the motor was built at least a few weeks+  before build date?

 

 

Julian date range was 20245 to 21063.  So September 1st 2020 to March 4th 2021.  This is the exact target range of possible defective lifters produced in the parts network, part kits, engines.

Edited by newdude
Posted (edited)

Someone posted on one of these threads that they had a build date of 8/21, which is supposed to be after the range date, and also a no dfm, and he has the problem. sounds lile it anyway, it started shaking bad, died, then wouldnt start.

Edited by AD80
Posted

I have seen on a facebook group a GM Tech showing 2022 models with under 5k miles showing up with lifter failures.

Posted

Too bad there was never a resolution posted in the below thread. His truck had no DFM.

 

 

Posted
22 hours ago, Jricharc said:

I have seen on a facebook group a GM Tech showing 2022 models with under 5k miles showing up with lifter failures.

Dude stays busy. I wonder if some of these 22 Limited trucks were 21's that sat too long after assembly and then switched to 22's. 

Posted
On 1/19/2022 at 2:18 PM, Byrds8 said:

Too bad there was never a resolution posted in the below thread. His truck had no DFM.

 

 

 

Pretty hard to attribute that issue to a failed DFM lifter.  Given it wouldn't start after all the racket he described, I would suspect it was something a little more dramatic.

Posted

I bought my TB without AFM from the factory and am just north of 2000 miles with a build date in July of 2021. Very curious about this topic as well. I know that it has been said that these engines still come with the collapsible lifters on 4 cylinders but I would still like confirmation from an actual engine tear down. I just hope it won’t be mine…

Posted
9 minutes ago, Desrunner said:

I bought my TB without AFM from the factory and am just north of 2000 miles with a build date in July of 2021. Very curious about this topic as well. I know that it has been said that these engines still come with the collapsible lifters on 4 cylinders but I would still like confirmation from an actual engine tear down. I just hope it won’t be mine…

 I maybe wrong but as DFM works randomly on all 8 cylinders , I would not think GM would only put in 4 even without the chip to activate it.

Posted
14 minutes ago, WeGone said:

 I maybe wrong but as DFM works randomly on all 8 cylinders , I would not think GM would only put in 4 even without the chip to activate it.

He has a Custom Trail Boss with the L82 AFM 5.3 as opposed to the L84 DFM 5.3. The L82 has the older AFM system that is only present on four of the cylinders. With half of the movable lifters, mathematically it's half as likely to fail, but I believe the parts on those four cylinders are similar/the same (albeit with a different control/oiling system).

Posted

2019 RST4x4 5.3. 24,000 to date no issues. I am in the minority in that I don't mind the DFM my lifetime mpg is over 20 mpg. The system seems pretty seamless the microsecond delay to full power is not an issue for me. 2019 being the first year with the new DFM  I purchased the extended warranty for 7 years if it breaks I'll get it fixed. In the meantime I will be out enjoying this technical marvel to its fullest! I say technical marvel because I grew up riding and driving in 70's and 80's trucks these new T-1's are complex machines that are powerful and capable get out and enjoy! 

Posted
1 hour ago, voided3 said:

He has a Custom Trail Boss with the L82 AFM 5.3 as opposed to the L84 DFM 5.3. The L82 has the older AFM system that is only present on four of the cylinders. With half of the movable lifters, mathematically it's half as likely to fail, but I believe the parts on those four cylinders are similar/the same (albeit with a different control/oiling system).

Thanks for the clarification did not know AFM was still used at all!!

 

Posted
3 hours ago, WeGone said:

Thanks for the clarification did not know AFM was still used at all!!

 

The 2021 model year was the last for the L82 AFM version of the 5.3, as well as the 4.3 V6 with AFM. The 2022 LTDs and 2022 refresh models won't have those, only the DFM L84 5.3. The currently-available 2.7 turbo I-4 has a different variant of AFM that shuts off two of the four cylinders, though.

Posted
6 hours ago, voided3 said:

He has a Custom Trail Boss with the L82 AFM 5.3 as opposed to the L84 DFM 5.3. The L82 has the older AFM system that is only present on four of the cylinders. With half of the movable lifters, mathematically it's half as likely to fail, but I believe the parts on those four cylinders are similar/the same (albeit with a different control/oiling system).

Correct, L82 with the 6 speed and -$50 (credit) for not having AFM. I drove the L84 with the 8 speed and was not a fan, which had AFM and start/stop. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So you're saying toss the baby out with the bathwater? @txab posted article was her take on how AI can be used to manipulate pricing as it already does and has been rebuked by the judiciasry in housing. How AI can be and is used to maximize refinery or even Amazon operations all of which are true but because she is who she is; that makes what she says about what is true, false? Is that something akin to Pre-justice aka prejudice?    Look, I'm first in line to approach all information with caution just because we live in a world where people like to lie about someone or something with such a straight face and in such volume that it makes digging to the truth wearisome. Meaning I understand the skepticisms but if I were to toss out everything a person is for a view they hold then my pool of people to draw wisdom from would be non-existent and I'd be forced to reinvent the wheel daily. Not practical.    "Be innocent as a dove but as cautious as a serpent."    Test each word. Every good lie is part truth or no one would believe it. Find the truth in it and reject what isn't.    On this one, AI is being used to do what has been done by hand for hundreds of years already but at such speed, the point of a computer, that it is more easily monetized. This one wasn't that hard a lift.    I wrote a few formulas in a Lotus 123 program decades ago, a series of linked Macros actually, that allowed a daily inventory to be turned into a running P&L and production plan. Something that took three departments a week to assemble now took the time it takes to input the 'daily changes' in inventory. Later that was ungraded to the more powerful Excel program an and integrated with bar code scanning, inventory to supply was done once per shift. It had a huge impact on production scheduling, Seamless interruption flexibility, inventory error reduction, raw materials cost effective utilization and scrap reduction. Huge improvement in the bottom line. I spent months on that and AI could have done it in minutes. So yes, it not only can be used, they would be foolish to not try. The legality, ethics and morality are not the domain of AI. Humans need to keep a reign on it. 
    • New to this forum.  Also looking to tune a 6L80 and trying to work out all the issues in my transmission swap.  I have a 6.2 diesel (1983) and have removed the TH-400 and about to put in a 6L80 with a TCM-2600 interface and don't have a clue what I doing after that.  Did you (Leatherneck/RAV3) get your slip resolved? I too hate to spend that kind of money on a tuner that hopefully I will not need too many times although from what steelerdude15 added about the HP Tuner being great for diagnostics would be a plus.  I am also from WNC but below you in Columbus.  Any helo would be greatly appreciated.  
    • Sounds like a smart reasonable person with common sense. Bill O’Riley never said he was just a journalist, by the way.
    • It's like saying Bill O'Reilly is "just" a journalist.         Lauren Fix, widely known as "The Car Coach," is a prominent automotive journalist, television personality, and self-identified conservative. She is a frequent contributor to right-leaning networks and platforms, offering commentary that intersects the automotive industry, consumer economics, and conservative political perspectives. [1, 2, 3] Media and Commentary Network Contributions: Fix serves as the National Automotive Correspondent for Newsmax and is a frequent guest on Fox News and Fox Business. Video Platforms: She has contributed to PragerU, where she has hosted videos critiquing government mandates on vehicles. [1, 2, 3] Core Positions Anti-EV Mandates & Fuel Policies: Fix regularly critiques government subsidies and mandates for electric vehicles (EVs), framing them as impractical and burdensome to the average consumer. She advocates for consumer choice and supports traditional internal combustion engine vehicles. [1, 2, 3] Economic Analysis: Her commentary often emphasizes the impacts of fuel prices, inflation, and federal regulations on drivers. [1, 2, 3] Political Alignment: On her public channels, she actively supports deregulation, "drill baby drill" energy policies, and the removal of government restrictions on auto sales and manufacturing. [1, 2] For analysis from Lauren Fix on how consumer automotive choices can align with political leanings:
    • Wouldn't swapping out the original AFM/DFM parts for a complete Delete Kit be the best route to go if one could afford to go that route?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...