Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Bumping this up again for more feedback. I'm looking hard at a '22-23 refresh Sierra 1500 AT4 but I'm very worried about seat comfort. I've been in a couple '21 Sierras/Silverados and their seats are terribly firm and uncomfortable. My other potential truck is a '22 Lariat F150 and their seats are like a La-Z-Boy recliner compared to the GM trucks. I can't find a '22 refresh Sierra near me to look at, so I'm hoping to get some advice from you guys.

Edited by Spencer Munn
Posted

seats are the same.  theyre rock hard and uncomortable.   if you saw what the cushions in an f150 were made out of, you'd understand why they feel that way.  my last truck was an 18 f150.  I put factory leather in it myself at 40k or so and the cushions were all ripped and completely shot.   i eventually replaced the drivers seat bottom.   I weigh 200#, so it isn't like it was my fault.    i'll take the chevy seats any day of the week.  they'll loosen up.  mine already seem to be marginally better than they were two months ago.

 

Posted
29 minutes ago, ascalise said:

seats are the same.  theyre rock hard and uncomortable.   if you saw what the cushions in an f150 were made out of, you'd understand why they feel that way.  my last truck was an 18 f150.  I put factory leather in it myself at 40k or so and the cushions were all ripped and completely shot.   i eventually replaced the drivers seat bottom.   I weigh 200#, so it isn't like it was my fault.    i'll take the chevy seats any day of the week.  they'll loosen up.  mine already seem to be marginally better than they were two months ago.

 

Honest question because I’ve never seen the F150 cushion.  Wouldn’t be the similar foam material to a Silverado/Sierra except it’s thicker?   

Posted
On 9/24/2022 at 12:42 AM, Spencer Munn said:

Bumping this up again for more feedback. I'm looking hard at a '22-23 refresh Sierra 1500 AT4 but I'm very worried about seat comfort. I've been in a couple '21 Sierras/Silverados and their seats are terribly firm and uncomfortable. My other potential truck is a '22 Lariat F150 and their seats are like a La-Z-Boy recliner compared to the GM trucks. I can't find a '22 refresh Sierra near me to look at, so I'm hoping to get some advice from you guys.

I rented a Ford and the seats were great in comparision to my '21 Denali...which kinda suck. Rented a Dodge too and the Ford had the best seats....too bad its a Ford. Love my truck in 100 ways...hate the seats. 

Posted
On 9/24/2022 at 12:31 PM, ascalise said:

seats are the same.  theyre rock hard and uncomortable.   if you saw what the cushions in an f150 were made out of, you'd understand why they feel that way.  my last truck was an 18 f150.  I put factory leather in it myself at 40k or so and the cushions were all ripped and completely shot.   i eventually replaced the drivers seat bottom.   I weigh 200#, so it isn't like it was my fault.    i'll take the chevy seats any day of the week.  they'll loosen up.  mine already seem to be marginally better than they were two months ago.

 

Thank you for the info, even though it is disappointing to hear. I'm a farmer, so depending on the day I might get in/out of the truck 30 times or more. The seats in my '14 F150 are still holding together and extremely comfortable. I also live pretty far from everywhere so I would prefer a comfortable seat for my long drives. But the new Sierra is interesting enough I still plan to track one down to sit in myself before deciding. As is the case with most things, the ideal truck for me would be a weird Ford/GM/RAM hybrid. 

Posted

my last gm a 2013 suburban ltz had awful front seat comfort, my 2022 refresh custom with the 10 way power seat is much better but still not as good as my 2014 ram 1500 or my 08 tundra, but I've been logging long miles and getting out at fill ups still able to walk although stiff and need a little stretch lol, I was in a gmc 2022 refresh loaded leather for a long drive as well and it was same, maybe even a little better than the softer cloth of the custom but they are livable to me now and I'm not cursing it through ownership like I did with the 2013 which lasted 1 year before I went to the ram 1500

Posted (edited)

I have a 2020 AT4 and recently sat in a refresh AT4 and I can say with certainty they are improved/slightly softer.  stitching is slightly different along with the cover and padding being softer but yet firm.  They new seat was more comfortable brand new then my 2yr old seat.  They might still be too firm for some but IMO they are improved over my '20 at4.  Can't speak for other models but I'm assuming they changed all leather versions as they all seem to have slightly different stitch lines.   They now use the same cover/padding design  as the 21+ yukon.

 

I am unable to locate a part # for the refresh but may end up ordering new cover and pad for a 22 refresh once available. 

 

2022 refresh

image.png.2e4d8cd0cfa72cab7fb8148a973a65c5.png

 

2021

image.png.8832c446a0caf9eadb6add10250fa952.png

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by ajs800
  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Was at the GMC dealership yesterday, and sat in both a '22 AT4 and AT4X.  IMO you have to move up to the AT4X to get a somewhat comfortable seat bottom cushion, and it also had massaging seat backs.  To me the AT4 seats felt the same as prior years, like a park bench.    

Posted
1 hour ago, CE750 said:

Was at the GMC dealership yesterday, and sat in both a '22 AT4 and AT4X.  IMO you have to move up to the AT4X to get a somewhat comfortable seat bottom cushion, and it also had massaging seat backs.  To me the AT4 seats felt the same as prior years, like a park bench.    

 

That is sad that type of truck is marketed and geared towards that type of customer. Those owners are never going to use any of its capability, yet they guys that will, they don't get the option. The suburban soccer dads are ruining trucks and pricing out the actual people that need and use them. 

 

Tyler

Posted

Just came out of my 21 Silverado into a 2022 refreshed Sierra. I find the seats a little softer not and not as rock hard. It was enough to instantly notice it so time will tell if they stay as comfortable.

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, latreille89 said:

Just came out of my 21 Silverado into a 2022 refreshed Sierra. I find the seats a little softer not and not as rock hard. It was enough to instantly notice it so time will tell if they stay as comfortable.

 

That's what I noticed. The seats in the refresh aren't a firm as the others. Granted, I had a 2500 HC and a 2500 Denali, but the seats were the same. These new ones seem to have more give to them. However, as you said, will they hold up as well as the others. What I've always noticed is that while the GM truck seats were much firmer than that of Ford or RAM, they held up better over time and didn't get flat or sink.

Posted

I sat in a 2022 recently and they felt a bit softer than my 2020.  Mine still look new after 34k miles though, wearing extremely well.

  • 6 months later...
Posted

1st post. 
I have a ‘23 Sierra 1500 Denali. Less than 2K miles. These seats are the worst. Maybe they’re better than the previous generation but compared to the King Ranch I traded in they’re gawd awful. So very disappointed. 

  • 3 months later...
Posted
On 5/25/2023 at 7:26 PM, Kevin Bray said:

1st post. 
I have a ‘23 Sierra 1500 Denali. Less than 2K miles. These seats are the worst. Maybe they’re better than the previous generation but compared to the King Ranch I traded in they’re gawd awful. So very disappointed. 

 

2023 Silverado LTZ seats are worse than my 2008 Silverado LT seats and much worse than the 2023 F150 Lariat seats.

 

The biggest issue is the short popliteal seat depth. The bottom seat cushion ends much too early and is not close enough to the back of the knee.

Posted (edited)

I've owned all of the Big 3. All high end models with leather. Since 2016, I've owned an F150 King Ranch, then Ram Limited 1500 , F150 Platinum and now GMC Sierra Denali Ultimate 1500. I never had seat issues with any of them and the GMC comfort is equal to all which means excellent. The massage feature is much better than the F150. 

Edited by Jus Cruisin

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,337 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...