Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've had my new 22 refresh AT4 diesel for a couple hundred miles and thought I'd post the few things I've noticed different about it versus my previous 2020 AT4 diesel. These are things I've noticed different before I get too used to them and forget what the old truck was like! The two trucks are optioned nearly the same (CarbonPro, 3.0, same options) except the wheels/tires. The 22 has 18" Duratrac MT and the 2020 had 20" GY Trailrunner AT.

 

1. The 22 is missing the passive door lock/unlock buttons on the exterior rear door handles. I assume this is due to the chip/parts shortage but still find it odd. Wish they had them - I find it useful in parking lots when I want to put something in the back seat first.

2. The 22 has chrome exhaust outlet trim surround where the 2020 AT4 CarbonPro had matte black trim. I prefer the matte black. 

3. The 22 seems to have less noise in the cab, like it has more sound insulation. 

4. The 22 Bose stereo sounds a little better than the 2020 Bose

5. I am getting better MPG in the same drive cycle in the 22 than the 2020. It is still new so not enough miles to really know if there is a difference yet.

6. The transmission seems to shift slightly smoother in the 22 and seems to hold gears more before downshifting versus the 2020. Small but noticeable difference. Might be the trans still learning since it is still new, but I like the 22 better so far. 

7. The 2020 AT4 had a sport mode, the 22 does not. 

8. The 2020 AT4 temp gauge would move up above 210 sometimes as the computer was controlling water temp to various parts of the engine. This freaked some people out when the 3.0 diesel came out but it is normal operation. I have not seen the 22 temp gauge fluctuate the same way. I bet GM masked that so not to worry people that it is overheating.

9. The 22 diesel has a slightly longer crank time than my 2020 diesel. My 2020 never suffered from the crank but no start issue, so I never had it flashed. I understand the revised programming lengthened the crank time slightly. Small but noticeable. I prefer the 2020.

10. The 22 auto-start/stop is less aggressive than the 2020. The 20 would stop the engine much more often. 

11. The center console in the 22 seems smaller than the 20 even though they look like they are the same size. Maybe I just don't have my stuff organized yet!

12. The 22 has the button for all 4 windows down at the same time, the 2020 did not. I like that, but wish I could push it up to roll them all up too. 

 

Of course, the 22 interior and tech is vastly improved. That makes it feel like an entirely different truck to me. My old 2020 was the best truck I've ever owned and so far I like the 22 even more. The only thing I might do different is skip the 18" Duratracs - they are already noisier than I like and I don't need the aggressive off-road tire. That's a relatively easy fix with some different tires though. 

 

  • Like 3
Posted
23 minutes ago, 6sigma said:

1. The 22 is missing the passive door lock/unlock buttons on the exterior rear door handles. I assume this is due to the chip/parts shortage but still find it odd. Wish they had them - I find it useful in parking lots when I want to put something in the back seat first.

 

It's not. It's simply a cost-cutting measure. The 2019 Silverados had the buttons on all four handles, they were deleted for 2020. Well before any of the chip shortage/supply chain issues started. Us GMC guys were lucky enough to keep them through the '22 LTD, but now our time has come. :(

Posted

Yeah I have noticed even the Fords will not have buttons on back. Sucks but oh well. Good write up OP.  

Posted

The passive door handles for the rear is probably the only thing that I miss. 

Posted (edited)

Thanks for the write up.  Is there rear window the same crappy design that is guaranteed to leak eventually?  Hard to believe GM let that go on more than one year, let alone 6 years when this design (normally) runs its course.

Edited by cltsig
Posted

Thanks for the write up OP. I've got a 20' AT4 3.0 CP truck just like the one you got rid of.

 

I have to agree with you on the black matte exhaust surrounds and the 20 CP gray wheels.

I think I like the front end better on mine vs. the refreshed model as well.

 

The interior though is no contest. They really did a fantastic job on the new trucks.

 

Enjoy the new truck! And maybe post a few pics too.

Posted

How many miles were on the 20 when you traded it?

 

I just traded in my 2021 Silverado 3.0 with 33000 miles for a 2022 refresh. The engine in the new one is WAY quieter. 

Posted (edited)

1. Simple cost cutting measure by GM. They did it on the Silverado's in 2020.

2. You can buy the black tips from GM or have your chrome ones powder coated.

3. Agreed. I had a 2020 Silverado RST, a 2021 GMC AT4, and now the refresh 2022 Silverado LTZ. The GMC AT4 had less cab noise than the 2020 Silverado, but the 2022 LTZ has even less than the AT4. I think my reduction in noise may be due to the AT4 had the 20" mud tires and not the all-terrain tires. The 2022 does seem to have less noise than the 2020 though.

4. The Bose does sound good in the 2022, but I can't for the life of me find the speed adjusted volume setting. I do think the bass in the 2021 AT4 hit a little harder than the 2022.

5. All 3 of mine were the 3.0. The 2020 RST averaged 25 mpg in the city and 29-30 on the highway (it had the 18" wheels and 31" tires). The 2021 AT4 did the worse, obviously, but still got in the 20-25 range consistently. The 2022 LTZ has only been on 1 trip in the 2,8xx miles it has on it. It did very well averaging 27. The 2021 AT4 and the 2022 LTZ have both had the S&B intake and the PPE turbo resonator delete on them.

6. I feel the same way about the 2022 transmission. It does seem to hold gears longer and seems to shift a tad harder than the other 2 trucks.

7. My 2021 AT4 had Sport Mode (built in August 2021), but I saw that the later built AT4's didn't have Sport Mode.

8. The temp gauge on the dash is really just a dummy gauge. They haven't been accurate since the mid-90's.

9. The longer crank is the "fix" for the crank no start issues that plagued the 2021+ models. My 2022 LTZ does the same thing. That was the first thing I noticed when I drove the 2022.

10. Get the Autostop Eliminator (https://www.autostopeliminator.com/collections/gm/products/2019-silverado-sierra-autostop-eliminator). It is worth it. I don't like the Start/Stop on any vehicle. 

11. The storage compartment in the center console is smaller than the pre-refresh trucks. The console itself is the same physical size.

12. This was on some of the 2022 models. It seems like it is hit or miss for when GM puts this in the trucks. You can also roll all the windows down by holding down the unlock button on the key fob, if you've turned it on in the settings, even if you don't have the button on the dash.

 

The only thing that some people have a problem with in the refresh interior is it does require the data plan to have the built in Google Maps operate. That doesn't bother me as I do pay for the data plan.

 

The only complaint I have with my 2022 LTZ refresh is the wheels. I like the polished LTZ wheels on the 2019-2022 LTD's. The wheels now look almost exactly like the Custom 20" wheels. I'm hoping to find a set of 2019-2021 LTZ wheels that are polished to swap out, as long as they are not that expensive.

Edited by mjonesjr84
Posted

Both my 21 AT4 that I traded and my current 22 AT4 have sport mode.

Posted
15 minutes ago, Firehawk99 said:

Your 22 must be a limited, not a refreshed then.

My 22 is the refresh model.

Posted
1 hour ago, Firehawk99 said:

Wow! Can you post up a picture of it on the dash? I'd like to see it.

Yes, give me a few and I will post it up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 2,793 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...