Jump to content

OEM wireless Charging on 2022 Silverado LTZ

homermacleod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Denali_1500 Enthusiast

Denali_1500

Posted
Posted

 I just traded in a 2022 refresh SLT with wireless charging feature for a 2022 refresh Denali with the wireless charging feature. Well, the SLT never ever had an issue charging my iPhone 10 max pro or my iPhone 13 max pro. So this new Denali is a hit or miss on charging my iPhone 13 max pro now it seems. I only have 88 miles on it, but, I throw the phone in the charger just to have a nice place for it and expect it to charge as I go. This new truck has an issue it appears. I need to return to the dealer monday and I am going to see if I can get to my old SLT and take the rubber pad from it and exchange this Denali pad. It is ridiculous my SLT never had a charging issue. 

 

If curious why I got the Denali, It has working heated seats and SuperCruise. I been waiting 6 months on RetroFit parts for my SLT and tried of waiting on parts. Good thing I dont mind using a cable to charge my iPhone if needed on long trips it looks like if the SLT rubber pad does not fix the issue.

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

RedLT
RedLT

Work around for wireless Android Auto charging/depleting issue is to connect it with USB cable, this method will top off the battery while using Android Auto. Another option is to install the BoostAut

RedLT
RedLT

hmmm 🤔.. Infotainment system = Android. Maybe the wireless charger is made by Google.

Posted Images

claw2791 Enthusiast

claw2791

Posted
Posted

Same here on my Refresh 22 AT4X. Never had a problem with my 20 Denali. Stops charging or won't charge at all even after taking cases off.

 

iPhone 12 Pro Max

Samsung Fold3/4

 

 

chrisrw New Member

chrisrw

Posted
Posted

I have a similar problem on my 2022 Sierra. My phone charge quickly on my 2019 Sieerra but will not charge at all on my new 2022. When I put my phone on the charger, it will show a green symbol on the display, as though it is charging, but does not charge at all. The dealer said that it might be a blown fuse, but it is sensing that the phone is there. The phone charges if I plug it in.

  • 4 weeks later...
Eric Lang New Member

Eric Lang

Posted
Posted

2022 chevy silverado trailboss lt refresh with exact same issue. Samsung Zfold4, turned fast wireless charging off, removed rubber mat and still facing charge cycling.... SO FRUSTRATING

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bikerjon Enthusiast

Bikerjon

Posted
Posted

Sorry to you guys that paid extra for those wireless chargers but the Boost Auto Parts wireless charger is excellent, fast and powerful. It takes about 1 hour to install and has been fast charging my S22 Ultra for about a year now. I know you don't want to hear this but this will solve the problem.

  • 1 month later...
Kevin McDonald Enthusiast

Kevin McDonald

Posted
Posted (edited)

I picked up a 2023 AT4 two weeks ago and it's doing exactly the same thing. I won't take it to the dealership until GM acknowledges this with at least a TSB and a fix, I have a iPhone 13 Pro, with or  without the case does the same thing, took the pad off and it works slightly better, although slow, and then you get cold air blowing up through the console lid from the cooling vent on it, I traded a 2021 GMC SIERRA SLT and the wireless charging worked excellent, why are we going backwards on technology here?

 

 

Edited by Kevin McDonald
Jus Cruisin Enthusiast

Jus Cruisin

Posted
Posted

I'm lucky, I guess. S22 Ultra. Set it in the charging slot and away it goes. Do the Chevys have the same charging slot under the console lid as GMC? 

DirtyBird New Member

DirtyBird

Posted
Posted

This has been the only solution I have found that works. I tried all kinds of other methods before finally finding that this was the key. Hope it helps any others struggling to get their phone to charge ! 

 

https://www.etsy.com/listing/1430387683/wireless-charger-adapter-for-2022-gm?ga_order=most_relevant&ga_search_type=all&ga_view_type=gallery&ga_search_query=wireless+charger+gm&ref=sr_gallery-1-1&sts=1&organic_search_click=1

Kevin McDonald Enthusiast

Kevin McDonald

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, DirtyBird said:

This has been the only solution I have found that works. I tried all kinds of other methods before finally finding that this was the key. Hope it helps any others struggling to get their phone to charge ! 

 

https://www.etsy.com/listing/1430387683/wireless-charger-adapter-for-2022-gm?ga_order=most_relevant&ga_search_type=all&ga_view_type=gallery&ga_search_query=wireless+charger+gm&ref=sr_gallery-1-1&sts=1&organic_search_click=1

I also tried that with no success on my phone, I just will run with no charging pad on it until GM gets a fix

wepiii Enthusiast

wepiii

Posted
Posted
On 3/24/2023 at 11:26 AM, Kevin McDonald said:

I also tried that with no success on my phone, I just will run with no charging pad on it until GM gets a fix


try turning it up. That’s what I had to do and it works fantastic. 

image.jpg

MTY55 Enthusiast

MTY55

Posted
Posted

I've had my 23 Denali for three weeks now and the phone charger was absolutely terrible. I have a Pixel 7 Pro with the  case on it was almost impossible to find the sweet spot . It was better with the case off. Last week I downloaded a system update GM N22-239253. Ever since that update the charger has performed flawlessly anywhere on the pad as long as the  goes in top down That's even with the case on.

Kevin McDonald Enthusiast

Kevin McDonald

Posted
Posted
21 hours ago, MTY55 said:

I've had my 23 Denali for three weeks now and the phone charger was absolutely terrible. I have a Pixel 7 Pro with the  case on it was almost impossible to find the sweet spot . It was better with the case off. Last week I downloaded a system update GM N22-239253. Ever since that update the charger has performed flawlessly anywhere on the pad as long as the  goes in top down That's even with the case on.

 

I just checked mine under updates and had nothing new, hadn't been checked since 3/9, mine is a AT4 diesel, not sure what your Denali is

MTY55 Enthusiast

MTY55

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, Kevin McDonald said:

 

I just checked mine under updates and had nothing new, hadn't been checked since 3/9, mine is a AT4 diesel, not sure what your Denali is

Just a 5.3 Denali with the Reserve Package. No Super Cruise. This is what I took off my phone as to what the updated  enhanced.   I see your a trap shooter .Go out and break some Birds. I'd be getting ready break some skeet birds this morning but the club is closed for Easter weekend. Hang in there I'm sure the update will bet to you soon.

.image.thumb.png.aa718181c57d5aa35c6bca9af2c58a77.png

Kevin McDonald Enthusiast

Kevin McDonald

Posted
Posted
On 4/8/2023 at 9:57 AM, MTY55 said:

Just a 5.3 Denali with the Reserve Package. No Super Cruise. This is what I took off my phone as to what the updated  enhanced.   I see your a trap shooter .Go out and break some Birds. I'd be getting ready break some skeet birds this morning but the club is closed for Easter weekend. Hang in there I'm sure the update will bet to you soon.

.image.thumb.png.aa718181c57d5aa35c6bca9af2c58a77.png

Im actually a skeet shooter also, 3 TN state titles in it. I still have no software update from GM, I wonder if it was a gas only update, or maybe a Denali only update, who knows, Im still using mine with the rubber pad off and its working pretty good.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...