Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Got a couple of weekend mods done.

 

Installed the front receiver hitch and receiver hitch winch. No modifications to the rabbit comb required. 

 

20230211_105935.thumb.jpg.d7332604c3ebda1a7402bd4683b8dc3d.jpg

 

20230211_105908.thumb.jpg.5984c529d6e76a1bd206c21982ac3729.jpg

 

Stole the gooseneck winch for the time being..

20230213_114952.thumb.jpg.fe5cc13d4eadb5b193955c8cf45bcf60.jpg

 

While I was underneath, I installed the moog idler arm hose kit. Remove grease zerk, install the 90° fitting and hose, connect to the swaybar bolt...

20230211_112019.thumb.jpg.ca3c25a3017b8fe6a9607294ddbde01d.jpg

 

20230211_113327.thumb.jpg.fb63797e400de97b8d0daa622bd4a021.jpg

Edited by gemarsh
Posted

First I've seen/heard of the Moog idler arm hose kit.  If I'm seeing it right does this just act as a remote grease point that's easier to get to?  Interesting.  Your receiver mount turned out perfect.  That sure will come in handy.

Posted (edited)

If you want to tow backwards down the highway with only one gear, I guess that’s between you and the highway police, but the rest of us are busy having a serious debate about whether 6 gears or 10 gears is better.  Please don’t complicate that debate. 

 

Edited by Another JR
Typo
  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Another JR said:

If you want to tow backwards down the highway with only one gear, I guess that’s between you and the highway police, but the rest of us are busy having a serious debate about whether 6 gears or 10 gears is better.  Please don’t complicate that debate. 

 

 

Don't live on.the farm, huh?

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Sonders said:

First I've seen/heard of the Moog idler arm hose kit.  If I'm seeing it right does this just act as a remote grease point that's easier to get to?  Interesting.  Your receiver mount turned out perfect.  That sure will come in handy.

 

That is correct. Don't have to remove the 4 15mm bolts to drop the skid plate to service.

Posted
13 minutes ago, gemarsh said:

 

Don't live on.the farm, huh?

Seriously though, could you briefly describe what was involved in doing that front receiver installation?  Small bolt on, big cross member bolt on, or welding job?  Thanks. 

Posted
48 minutes ago, gemarsh said:

 

That is correct. Don't have to remove the 4 15mm bolts to drop the skid plate to service.

That’s fantastic. Is there a part number you used? Thanks

Posted

I sued a Draw-tite on mine, the front clips are different obviously and I had to cut an opening in the bumper valance... but it is way higher and less likely to get stabbed into the dirt. Wondering if one that was higher was available for the newer trucks?

Posted

The receiver bolts on using the rear bolts of the tow hooks and existing holes on the bottom of the frame. No modification needed.

 

I went out the trashcan and took a picture, before I realized I bought them from amazon.

 

20230211_114757.thumb.jpg.eb0abbecbd20efd91b114c02efdcb4b1.jpg

 

Moog K6714

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Another JR said:

Seriously though, could you briefly describe what was involved in doing that front receiver installation?  Small bolt on, big cross member bolt on, or welding job?  Thanks. 

 

Edited by NWStever
Responded to the wrong comment by Another JR
Posted
5 hours ago, Another JR said:

If you want to tow backwards down the highway with only one gear, I guess that’s between you and the highway police, but the rest of us are busy having a serious debate about whether 6 gears or 10 gears is better.  Please don’t complicate that debate. 

 

A front receiver can make recovery from a difficult (trapped!) trailer turn around situation manageable.  Many folks also use them to help park trailers in difficult, tight spots. OTOH, the seriously blocked view with the trailer in front of you limits the utility for tight parking unless you have a carefully observant and level-headed spotter who can give clear, unambiguous directions. Most wives will not pass that test. Obviously YMMV!  Cheers!

Posted
Just now, NWStever said:

Most wives will not pass that test. Obviously YMMV!  Cheers!

 

tenor.gif.09d2702ace1b904eeba4f6d80765b98a.gif

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, NWStever said:

A front receiver can make recovery from a difficult (trapped!) trailer turn around situation manageable.  Many folks also use them to help park trailers in difficult, tight spots. OTOH, the seriously blocked view with the trailer in front of you limits the utility for tight parking unless you have a carefully observant and level-headed spotter who can give clear, unambiguous directions. Most wives will not pass that test. Obviously YMMV!  Cheers!

I was trying to be funny. I thought my comment was absurd enough that it didn’t need a /s, which was probably a bad assumption on my part. I am familiar with the ways a front hitch can be helpful.  Thanks for the polite explanation, though. 

Edited by Another JR
Typos
Posted
9 hours ago, Another JR said:

I was trying to be funny. I thought my comment was absurd enough that it didn’t need a /s, which was probably a bad assumption on my part. I am familiar with the ways a front hitch can be helpful.  Thanks for the polite explanation, though. 

Another JR -- Yes I knew your comment was  "Tongue in Cheek" but I wanted to let others to understand the possible benefit of a front receiver.  I'm surprised I didn't take heat from an insulted wife or two.  I'm certainly glad my wife doesn't visit this forum!  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Ahh, sorry about that - I got some bad info. Newdude is correct. That's what I get for working 13 hours straight ... on my "vacation", lol.   Should've checked the files I had instead of the internet.   Anyway ... this is GREAT news, since this would've been an absolute friggin nightmare to get working.   I'm telling you right now, your computer isn't bad. If it worked before the swap, it's working now. You need to do some more (better) diagnostics and figure out exactly what you're missing. Did you test every wire directly at the MAF? Have 5V reference? Ground? If you're reading ZERO g/s, your Hz isn't much use - it's going to be the wrong value anyway. The MAF is not working, and you need to find out WHY.   I got this off the net, so VERIFY first: Pin A: Black (BLK) wire, Circuit 552, serves as the Sensor Return (Ground).  Pin B: Tan (TAN) wire, Circuit 472, carries the Intake Air Temperature (IAT) signal.  Pin C: Yellow (YEL) wire, Circuit 492, is the primary MAF Sensor Signal output to the PCM. Pin D: Pink (PNK) wire, Circuit 339 or 539, provides Ignition 1 Voltage (Power).  Pin E: Tan/Black wire, Circuit 552 or similar, often associated with the Intake Air Temperature ground or signal return.  Global-A list: https://postimg.cc/KKJnQC85    
    • Correct....the end user can't reach to Realtruck directly like they can if they purchase a Bak, Undercover, etc...  It has to go through a dealer.
    • It is 4wd. shop told me it is the slip yoke. But not sure.
    • No, I did not tune out vvt. From what I read it should still be able to run without it, it'll just lose some torque/power.    I can see how that would make it not run correctly, but why would that cause the faulty MAF readings?   EDIT: I just ran a quick test and checked, and as I expected, the computer sees that the VVT cam phaser solenoid is not present, and throws a code for it, and does not try to change the cam angle at all. Commanded position just remains at zero, 100% of the time. This makes me think that the VVT is most likely not the cause of the problem though if anyone has a different/better explanation, I'm all ears.   UPDATE: I was able to find that my scan tool does indeed support reading the frequency (hz) off of the MAF (I thought it wasn't supported but turns out I just didn't know where to look for it). I noticed that regardless of engine state it always however this Is not what I observed with my multimeter. Like I said before, the MAF seems to put out a normal signal during cranking and then the signal drops to a very erratic reading once the engine is running. It seems from what my scan tool is telling me that the ECM is not recognizing this at all, and just reads 0 Hz 100% of the time. This pushes me towards the the PCM itself is faulty. I I have the PCM out of the 2007 donor vehicle, which I may try to connect and program (it's only ~50 bucks to get the software for a one-time programming)
    • Did you tune out the VVT?  07-09 they did not have VVT.  2010-2013 they did.      If you haven't tuned it, its trying to adjust cam timing.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...