Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I wasn’t sure which section to ask this question. I’ve been thinking about buying an afm disabler but I’m having a hard time knowing if it’s the right decision.  First there is the Range Technology brand and I’ve seen one on Amazon for $85 (OBDCAR). Is one brand better than the other?

 

Also, how many of you guys bought one of these and still had lifter issues vs you  just driving the truck in V4/V8 mode and had lifter issues?  
 

I’m trying to prolong the life of my truck. Is a ‘14 and just hit 88,000 miles today 

Posted

My advice for longevity is 5K oil changes.

  • Like 1
Posted

This is the first thing I did was buy a used Range AFM delete off od marketplace for my Certified used 2017 Silverado with 5.3 @ 30k miles. Four years later @ 55k miles and all is still fine. IMO, this AFM delete is the best insurance to minimize a stuck lifter. Below is a video that explains what cases the "mis engage" that causes the issue to start with. Do your own research as I did. If you disable the AFM you have eliminated at least 80-90% of the cause of it.

Also, using a good Synthetic oil & changing it every 4-5k miles is a good practice.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Just had the oil changed today at the dealer. They used or supposedly used 0-20w oil.  I’m leaning more on getting on. Do you think there is a difference in the Range and the one on Amazon that’s probably made in china for $85.99?

Posted

 sorry I don't know anything about the other AFM deletes other than the range. I think I paid $120 for my used Range online

Posted (edited)

It's kind of a roll of the dice. It may be fine but who knows. Some cheaper Chinese stuff works like the item it copied and some not so well. It's kind of your choice. I went with the Range brand because it was proven and was able to find a used one at a decent price. 

 

I bought Range late 2019 and have been using it on my 2016 purchased new in Apr 2016. I now have over 4 years of use and am at over 93k miles. Lifters have never been an issue (knocks on wood several times). Is it because I am using the Range? Who knows, maybe. But I feel it was a good measure to possibly prevent the problem.

Edited by mikeyk101
  • Like 1
Posted

I bought the Hyoertech Spectrum for alittle over $200, back in July off of I believe Realtrucks.com or American trucks.com.  Check either site. Turns off AFM, adjusts tire size, increases Hp/Tq depending on tune you choose, and adjusts TQ management. I am happy with it.  2nd one I have used. I used it on my 2018 SLT 6.2L. 

Screenshot_20230621_142726_Gmail.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

I bought the Hypertech Powerstay.  It's about half the price of the Range and does the same thing.

 

I've had it about a year, no problems.  

  • Like 2
Posted

TNTSierra,

 

Have you tried to use the Spectrum to make any "cooling fan adjustments" on you truck?

Posted
On 2/1/2024 at 10:28 AM, Texasdeere said:

TNTSierra,

 

Have you tried to use the Spectrum to make any "cooling fan adjustments" on you truck?

I did not see the option for that when I was installing it.  Don't believe my 2018 Denali had the ability too?

  • 2 years later...
Posted (edited)

I used the Holley F5 Flashpaq to tune mine out of AFM without an OBD dongle since I usually use it for the Autosync from BTDiesel which also allows AFM disable without being plugged in but does much more.
The F5 Flashpaq let me tune for 91+ octane for a bit of a horsepower boost, though. it also has transmission shift point options but I'm not versed enough to make advantage of that option.
Anyway, an OBD dongle isn't necessary with these options to retain AFM disable.
 

Edited by MikeBMW
  • Like 1
Posted
On 1/29/2024 at 6:09 PM, TNTSierra said:

I bought the Hyoertech Spectrum for alittle over $200, back in July off of I believe Realtrucks.com or American trucks.com.  Check either site. Turns off AFM, adjusts tire size, increases Hp/Tq depending on tune you choose, and adjusts TQ management. I am happy with it.  2nd one I have used. I used it on my 2018 SLT 6.2L. 

Screenshot_20230621_142726_Gmail.jpg

Prices sure have went up since your Purchase . Just checked & now listed at $476.18

on there website 

  • Sad 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted (edited)

The AFM disablers work okay, but sometimes they have to be unplugged from the OBD2 Port and plugged back in. It basically loops a can message the entire time not allowing the ECM to meet all the requirements to allow V4. If you are looking for a more permanent solution a custom tune would be better if not under warranty. Also keep in mind just because the AFM is disabled does not prevent a lifter from failing. It does lower the risk but does not completely eliminate the risk of a lifter failure. It does seem to make them last longer before failing though. I have a few customers who bought a custom tune from my company and still had lifter failures even with AFM disabled. A custom tune may cost a bit more than the AFM disabler but there are many more benefits, such at 2-3mpg improved fuel economy, better shifting, tcc slip removed to prevent premature torque converter wear, cooling fan settings, and better throttle response. It can be done remotely with a HP Tuners device or EFI Live Autocal. Just something to keep in mind.

Edited by jkptuned

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...