Jump to content

2026 HD's?

C/K Man
 Share

Recommended Posts

C/K Man Enthusiast

C/K Man

Posted
Posted

So, it looks like the 1500's will be updated for 2025, any word on the HD's?  Assuming the HD's are usually a year or two behind the 1500's I figure any new HD would be expected around late '26, maybe as a 2027MY.  I know a new generation of LS/LT gas engines are on the way, and there is a new Duramax coming, but I have not heard of anything else.  Also, the Silverado Medium duty trucks may get some changes too.   

64BAwagon Senior Enthusiast

64BAwagon

Posted
Posted

The last I heard was that the 25 models have some small changes and have been test built a couple of runs. I believe full change production will come in the next month or so. I wouldnt look for anything major, just some things to tidy up the 24 design. 

The 27's have been rumored to be prototyped for a while now. I believe there will be some serious electrical architecture changes (more $$$) and dependence on subscriptions to the point that Android auto and Apple car play will go away. Aesthetically I havent gotten any info on. My guess (worth what you paid for it) is that the rumored new gas AND the 8.3 Dmax will appear with this roll out. All purely speculative of course. 

Pryme Senior Enthusiast

Pryme

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, 64BAwagon said:

The last I heard was that the 25 models have some small changes and have been test built a couple of runs. I believe full change production will come in the next month or so. I wouldnt look for anything major, just some things to tidy up the 24 design. 

The 27's have been rumored to be prototyped for a while now. I believe there will be some serious electrical architecture changes (more $$$) and dependence on subscriptions to the point that Android auto and Apple car play will go away. Aesthetically I havent gotten any info on. My guess (worth what you paid for it) is that the rumored new gas AND the 8.3 Dmax will appear with this roll out. All purely speculative of course. 

I’m sure the gas offerings will be further hamstrung by particulate filters by then as well. 

PFTX_5.3 Enthusiast

PFTX_5.3

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Pryme said:

I’m sure the gas offerings will be further hamstrung by particulate filters by then as well. 

Yep, the more this emissions BS is announced, the more I'm tempted to stay in my current truck. We'll see how the '24 Dmax holds up.

64BAwagon Senior Enthusiast

64BAwagon

Posted
Posted

I am old enough and my vehicles are new enough that I could make them last as long as I will need. Just the fact that I look at things that way is kind of a sad commentary on America. 

Pryme Senior Enthusiast

Pryme

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, TripleBGM said:

Please change the gear shifter in front of the screen issue......

If vehicles didn’t have computer sized screens there wouldn’t be an issue haha. My shifters not in the way of my screen. But it’s not the size of a tv either. 

  • Like 1
newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, C/K Man said:

So, it looks like the 1500's will be updated for 2025, any word on the HD's?  Assuming the HD's are usually a year or two behind the 1500's I figure any new HD would be expected around late '26, maybe as a 2027MY.  I know a new generation of LS/LT gas engines are on the way, and there is a new Duramax coming, but I have not heard of anything else.  Also, the Silverado Medium duty trucks may get some changes too.   

 

 

...the 2025 MY 1500s are unchanged that I know of.  Should be 2026 MY for the 1500s so 2027 MY for HD.  

  • Like 1
C/K Man Enthusiast

C/K Man

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Particulate filters on gasoline engines will be a non-issue.  Gasoline engines produce far less particulates than diesels, so much so that regeneration on a gasoline engine PM filter should not be perceptible.  Of course adsorber catalysts requiring DEF will not be necessary.  PM filters have been on gasoline engines have been used in Europe for some time.    

rjgvt Enthusiast

rjgvt

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, TripleBGM said:

Please change the gear shifter in front of the screen issue......

 

I have the big screen and the shifter is at the bottom of the screen when in Drive. Non issue for me. Click on pic below to see my post on page 37.

 

 

Edited by rjgvt
chwilliams Enthusiast

chwilliams

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, TripleBGM said:

Please change the gear shifter in front of the screen issue......

 

I love it where it is, like where it's been since about forever. I was on the 1500/2500 fence and that's what threw me firmly to the 2500. The shifter on the console is also a huge waste of space, IMHO.

  • Like 1
newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, C/K Man said:

Particulate filters on gasoline engines will be a non-issue.  Gasoline engines produce far less particulates than diesels, so much so that regeneration on a gasoline engine PM filter should not be perceptible.  Of course adsorber catalysts requiring DEF will not be necessary.  PM filters have been on gasoline engines have been used in Europe for some time.    

 

 

If we get GPFs there will likely be some power loss.  Corvette C8 got hit on the Europe spec cars, especially the Z06 which loses almost 40hp.  If we get GPFs this will also signal a transition to Dexos2 or DexosR spec low ash oils like what is currently used in light duty diesels under 8500gvwr and the Corvette/Camaro/CT5-V Blackwing V8s, and those oils run higher on the pricing spectrum.  

 

This also means added sensors and regens so gas V8s will be about as useless as the current diesels when it comes to emissions problems.  

Edited by newdude
  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Grjfer Enthusiast

Grjfer

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, rjgvt said:

 

I have the big screen and the shifter is at the bottom of the screen when in Drive. Non issue for me. Click on pic below to see my post on page 37.

 

Unfortunately not all of us are 6'2".

 

Dunn Senior Enthusiast

Dunn

Posted
Posted
On 4/12/2024 at 9:24 PM, chwilliams said:

 

I love it where it is, like where it's been since about forever. I was on the 1500/2500 fence and that's what threw me firmly to the 2500. The shifter on the console is also a huge waste of space, IMHO.

am not a fan of console shifter....had one in a 23 1500.......totally kills the console for space.....only thing worse is a dial shifter 

  • Like 1
Mid-Night Rider Enthusiast

Mid-Night Rider

Posted
Posted
On 4/12/2024 at 2:06 PM, 64BAwagon said:

I am old enough and my vehicles are new enough that I could make them last as long as I will need. Just the fact that I look at things that way is kind of a sad commentary on America. 

True That!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Jsdirt
      2010 Avalanche 5.3 not running correctly after engine swap.

      By Jsdirt · Posted

      If everything checks out at the MAF, then the MAF is BAD, new or not.   You don't need a signal generator to troubleshoot this. PCM needs ALL powers and ALL grounds able to light a halogen headlight bulb - if it can light the bulb bright, then the wiring is good enough to run the PCM.   Best thing you can do for yourself is spend some time here: scannerdanner.com - Check out all his YouTube videos on similar issues. If you decide to subscribe it's the best bang-for-buck ratio in the automotive world, hands-down. He's got TONS of free vids on YouTube, too.
    • Tyler Gibbs
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Tyler Gibbs · Posted

      You got that Hengst D110??
    • contrabombarde
      2010 Avalanche 5.3 not running correctly after engine swap.

      By contrabombarde · Posted

      Yes, I used my multimeter to probe all of the wires at the MAF, both with the sensor connected, sensor disconnected, key on engine off, key on engine running, etc etc etc. I probed all of the wires again at the PCM, at the connectors, etc. All voltages are what they should be according to the service manual/wiring diagrams. All grounds are good, less than 20 millivolts from the battery negative under load. Both at the connector of the MAF, at the PCM connector etc.      I know this throws a pretty big wrench into things, but this truck was acting up before the swap. I don't have very much information, if any on what was causing it, but if you cleared all of the dtcs it would do the same thing where it would crank, fire, then die. And it would do the same thing a dozen or so times, and eventually it would start and run, but the difference is that it would run and actually be drivable. Whereas now if you can drive it at all, it goes into reduced power mode almost immediately, and even then it's not running correctly. When you come to a stop at a light it stumbles down to for 500 RPM before catching itself and returning to the smooth idle. And if you go more than about 50% throttle then it immediately goes back to doing the misfire thing.    Like I said, I know that throws a wrench into things, and unfortunately I was not able to pull any data or anything like that before I did this work, so I don't have much to go on.    I'm trying to not fixate on one particular thing as the cause of the problem, but it seems like all avenues are pointing me towards the PCM. Like I said I have tested the wiring extensively (see above), and during cranking the sensor does produce seemingly legitimate values at least according to my multimeter, but as soon as the engine fires those values quickly descend into gibberish. I've tried it with multiple different known working sensors, I have done literally every test I can think of multiple times on the wiring (probing the signals, probing the pins with the sensors unplugged, probing the pins at the PCM, voltage drop, voltage drop under load, continuity, ohms, and double-checking everything against the wiring diagrams/ proper values in the service data.)    Another thing that pushes me towards a possible PCM failure is, I have noticed in troubleshooting a little bit taking a break and coming back, that when I leave the truck to sit for a while and cool off, it starts and runs smoothly when I first start it up. However once it warms up. It starts having problems. For example, when I went out to the truck this morning after it had been sitting overnight, I was actually able to drive it down the block. And then once I got on the throttle a Little bit after going about a thousand ft, it started misfiring again. I pulled it back into the driveway, shut it down, and started it back up. It idled smoothly. As soon as I touched the throttle it did the misfire thing again. From then on as soon as I started it it would misfire. I shut the truck off and went to go get a coffee and do a bit more research. When I came back out I started the truck up and it immediately went into the smooth idle. After a couple of minutes of playing around with it, it would not idle smoothly anymore. Let it sit a couple of hours, rinse and repeat. This makes me think with temperature change something is going wrong inside the PCM. I have the PCM out of the 2007 donor vehicle and I'm thinking of getting a one-day subscription to the ACDelco programming service to try and program that and see if it helps.   Like I said, I'm really trying to not fixate myself on one potential cause, but it seems everything is pointing me towards PCM failure. I would really like to try to confirm that, but unfortunately I don't have an oscilloscope or a signal generator to do the GM service procedure where you feed 5 khz into the signal pin. 
    • Jsdirt
      2010 Avalanche 5.3 not running correctly after engine swap.

      By Jsdirt · Posted

      Ahh, sorry about that - I got some bad info. Newdude is correct. That's what I get for working 13 hours straight ... on my "vacation", lol.   Should've checked the files I had instead of the internet.   Anyway ... this is GREAT news, since this would've been an absolute friggin nightmare to get working.   I don't think the lack of VVT is causing this - you've got another issue. Wiring, I'm betting.   I'm telling you right now, your computer isn't bad. If it worked before the swap, it's working now. You need to do some more (better) diagnostics and figure out exactly what you're missing. Did you test every wire directly at the MAF? Have 5V reference? Ground? If you're reading ZERO g/s, your Hz isn't much use - it's going to be the wrong value anyway. The MAF is not working, and you need to find out WHY.   I got this off the net, so VERIFY first: Pin A: Black (BLK) wire, Circuit 552, serves as the Sensor Return (Ground).  Pin B: Tan (TAN) wire, Circuit 472, carries the Intake Air Temperature (IAT) signal.  Pin C: Yellow (YEL) wire, Circuit 492, is the primary MAF Sensor Signal output to the PCM. Pin D: Pink (PNK) wire, Circuit 339 or 539, provides Ignition 1 Voltage (Power).  Pin E: Tan/Black wire, Circuit 552 or similar, often associated with the Intake Air Temperature ground or signal return.  Global-A list: https://postimg.cc/KKJnQC85    
    • parthery
      GM Hard Folding Tonneau by REV review

      By parthery · Posted

      Correct....the end user can't reach to Realtruck directly like they can if they purchase a Bak, Undercover, etc...  It has to go through a dealer.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...