Jump to content

2018 GMC DMax to 2025 Custom Gas

Icutmetl
 Share

Recommended Posts

Icutmetl Enthusiast

Icutmetl

Posted
Posted (edited)

Traded in my 2018 2500HD All-Terrain HD SLT diesel with 176k on a 2025 2500HD Custom gas with 1 mile. I bought the GMC new and it was good to me for the most part but I did have a few issues with it over the years and although I took very good care of it and it still looked awesome with no rust, it was starting to develop some quirks and I ultimately made the call to replace it vs. flying closer and closer to the sun. My wife cried because she really loved our GMC and I was a little upset to my stomach too (giving up memories and cost of replacement), but it was time.
 

I chose gas over diesel this time mainly because of initial cost (purchased off grid camp on 10ac last year and that eats into our finances), I really don’t NEED the diesel, and although I may miss the grunt, I’m not sure the juice will be worth the squeeze for how I’m using it most of the time. 
 

I landed on the Custom package because of overall value. I really liked my SLT All-Terrain’s interior and features but again, it really came down to cost and being honest with myself about needs vs. wants. I liked the leather and buckets/console but never used the heated seats & wheel and forgot I had a sunroof most days. I feel we got an average deal (not great, but reasonable), and the transaction at our dealer was easy which counts for something with me. 

 

I considered a half ton this time but by the time I optioned a 1/2t truck for real work, I kept ending up at around the same price for an equal trim package…and a truck that lacks capability vs an HD. I’m really only towing snowmobile trailers a few times per year, but in gnarly conditions and getting pushed around by wind on snow packed roads in a lighter truck is no fun. I’ll also have my bed full (like Beverly Hillbilly full) driving 8hrs+ to our cabin and refuse to do that with the rear end sagging. So those things and also being able to tow a heavier piece of rental equipment every now and then kept me in an HD. 
 

My first impressions of the 6.6 gas engine during my test drive and on the way home from our dealership is that it’ll be better for my day to day use than the Duramax was for how I drive. It’s much more responsive and doesn’t feel heavy or sluggish. I don’t expect any disappointment until I really pour the beef to it with a load…which isn’t that often in reality. I get a vehicle allowance thru work and they pay for my fuel & basic maintenance, so while I don’t take that for granted or abuse it, the fuel mileage disparity is less of an issue. 

IMG_7744.jpeg

Edited by Icutmetl
  • Like 3
CRApex Enthusiast

CRApex

Posted
Posted

Nice looking truck!  Sounds like you made a good decision, that 6.6 gas will handle anything you throw at it.

  • Like 1
BuckWallace Enthusiast

BuckWallace

Posted
Posted

Very nice, congrats! I think you made the right choice going gas. Unless you're towing heavy often, it really doesn't make sense to go diesel (unless money is no object). I've been very happy with my gasser over the last 18 months—enjoy!

  • Like 1
NaturallyAspirated Enthusiast

NaturallyAspirated

Posted
Posted

Beautiful truck. Wife wishes I got that color instead of mine. 
 

I switched from a diesel 3/4 Ram. You’ll love the gasser. No more def is a big deal. And it’s probably much more reliable. Love my truck as much as when I first bought it. 
 

My L8T is at 57k mi and has never run smoother. And it pulls so much stronger than previous model yr gassers. The Custom is really a dressed up work truck. Not like the 1/2 ton truck-cars. Rides a little more rough but it’s smooth when loaded up. I personally like the ride and the wife finds it barely acceptable, which is better than the Ford and good enough for me.
 

Someone else one this site was wondering about using a 2500 as a daily driver and I think this truck is great all around, even for that! …as long as long as you ain’t in the city…

 

HD trucks are just so practical and this one should turn out to be very reliable.

 

 

  • Like 1
Icutmetl Enthusiast

Icutmetl

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 hours ago, Dunn said:

Yeah she looks really bummed, lol

Haha…my wife had a really hard time getting rid of our last truck because of all the memories attached to it and got pretty emotional a couple of times. It was my daily driver for the last 3-1/2 years, too. I Fluid-Filmed it 1-2x per year and was pretty ****** about keeping up to date on cleaning & maintenance. She’s really liking our new truck so far, though and do am I. I’m looking more and more forward to “making it mine.”

IMG_7729.jpeg

buelldude Enthusiast

buelldude

Posted
Posted

I have to ask, I think I may do the same, diesel to gas that is. How do you like it for towing, power wise and fuel use? We pulled the camper around more in the past, this year we only used it 3 times. 

   So here is my big issue with it, towing specs. It almost cuts the numbers in half for towing???? I have a gooseneck that is a bit on the heavy side but still falls into the specs of like trucks. I can't find any gas trucks with the pin weight over 2600. Can anyone post a pic of your door jam sticker????

bruceb58 Enthusiast

bruceb58

Posted
Posted (edited)
21 hours ago, buelldude said:

I have to ask, I think I may do the same, diesel to gas that is. How do you like it for towing, power wise and fuel use? We pulled the camper around more in the past, this year we only used it 3 times. 

   So here is my big issue with it, towing specs. It almost cuts the numbers in half for towing???? I have a gooseneck that is a bit on the heavy side but still falls into the specs of like trucks. I can't find any gas trucks with the pin weight over 2600. Can anyone post a pic of your door jam sticker????

You typically get larger payload numbers with gas. My 2024 GMC Denali 3/4T has 3346# of payload.

 

My max gooseneck tongue weight is 2760#

IMG_1604.JPG

Edited by bruceb58
Icutmetl Enthusiast

Icutmetl

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 hours ago, bruceb58 said:

You typically get larger payload numbers with gas. My 2024 GMC Denali 3/4T has 3346# of payload

IMG_1604.JPG

Mine is similar…3,4XXlbs of payload. You’ve got to go 3500 to get that extra leaf for max payload in an SRA.

 

i have not towed with it yet…just got it the day after Christmas. For my needs, I think it will suit me fine…but I have realistic expectations. That 10spd is magic but don’t expect it to grunt it out like my D.Max. 

 

That black 2018 Duramax for example had just under 2k payload. 

Ry Guy Enthusiast

Ry Guy

Posted
Posted

My ‘24 gasser custom has a payload of close to 3600 lbs and the door sticker says rated for ~2750 lbs gooseneck pin weight 

buelldude Enthusiast

buelldude

Posted
Posted

my trailer is stopping me from the gas truck. Well the list of pros/cons points to diesel. Good thread!!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.
    • KARNUT
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By KARNUT · Posted

      It was all part of the tiny bit of fuel savings it goes towards what was mandated by the government. Much like cylinder deactivation. That was relaxed by the recent administration. All that doesn’t help the individual buyer. But as a whole helps the manufacturer to try to reach the previous ridiculous past mileage per gallon mandate. So yes it was mandated and added cost to the vehicle. 
    • newdude
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By newdude · Posted

      You do realize that auto stop/start...was never mandated by the fed...right?     EPA Says It's 'Killing' Stop-Start, and Here's What Automakers Have to Say   "Start‑stop technology has never been federally mandated, and the EPA’s recent action removes regulatory incentives associated with it rather than prohibiting its use."
    • Jsdirt
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Jsdirt · Posted

      Anytime the government mandates something, you can bet on it being absolutely senseless.
    • c4racer2
      summer road trips in the 2026 2500HD

      By c4racer2 · Posted

      just logged my best MPG for one leg this am - drove home from the Denver Airport, 45 min drive - all freeway, lots of traffic so speeds were limited and some stop and go, got 17.7 for the ~30 mile trip.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...