Jump to content

Is your GMT-900 using oil  

1,555 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Mine burns less oil if I keep my foot out of it. I can burn a quart in 300 miles towing with the cruise control on, on a hilly highway. If the truck downshifts to second and tachs out at 5k, it'll use oil like crazy. If I keep the RPMs lower on hills, I have gone almost 10k miles on a quart.

 

But, I'm sure as the truck ages, this will get worse and worse. No tune on mine aside from the one-size-fits-all Hypertech plug-in programmer I used.

 

Started using oil around 50k miles (85k on it now). Before that it never used a drop, but would puff blue out the pipes, using the remote start so I could watch. Hasn't done that since I installed the catch can.

Edited by Jsdirt
Posted

2011 Sierra SLT 5.3, same issues as everyone else. Had many oil consumption tests done, so I called GM to complain. They called the dealer to inquire and dealer says falls with in 3200 km guidelines, then between 5-7k oil change barely touching dip stick and getting worse with every oil change. I told the lady I'm not the only one as sites filled with people having same issues. Well they should be telling their dealers the problems, Really? Most dealers brush them off as they did with me saying its normal. I asked her where my oil is going? no reply! There is an issue maybe compensate the people with problems not sweep it under the carpet. So frustrated at this point paying all that money for never ending issues. Then the dealer says come on down we can get you in a new Denali, we just need $40 k and your truck. just makes you laugh. Been a loyal gm guy buying new vehicles every 3-5 years but I'm done with gm.

  • Like 2
Posted

2011 Sierra SLT 5.3, same issues as everyone else. Had many oil consumption tests done, so I called GM to complain. They called the dealer to inquire and dealer says falls with in 3200 km guidelines, then between 5-7k oil change barely touching dip stick and getting worse with every oil change. I told the lady I'm not the only one as sites filled with people having same issues. Well they should be telling their dealers the problems, Really? Most dealers brush them off as they did with me saying its normal. I asked her where my oil is going? no reply! There is an issue maybe compensate the people with problems not sweep it under the carpet. So frustrated at this point paying all that money for never ending issues. Then the dealer says come on down we can get you in a new Denali, we just need $40 k and your truck. just makes you laugh. Been a loyal gm guy buying new vehicles every 3-5 years but I'm done with gm.

 

Another loyal GM customer being driven away. Same here. Apparently the General doesn't care. They don't think they can go bankrupt again.

 

And here we were led to believe that the revised driver's side valve cover (PCV orifice) and oil deflector in the oilpan were factory installed beginning with the 2011 models. Guess not, or this proves that they were not very useful 'fixes' in the continuing AFM oil usage problem. I'm waiting for the new GM models to report they are having the same problems. Honda is having the same problem. Wonder why Dodge is not with their Hemi's MDS?

Posted

 

Another loyal GM customer being driven away. Same here. Apparently the General doesn't care. They don't think they can go bankrupt again.

 

And here we were led to believe that the revised driver's side valve cover (PCV orifice) and oil deflector in the oilpan were factory installed beginning with the 2011 models. Guess not, or this proves that they were not very useful 'fixes' in the continuing AFM oil usage problem. I'm waiting for the new GM models to report they are having the same problems. Honda is having the same problem. Wonder why Dodge is not with their Hemi's MDS?

I've worked at Chrysler and wondered the same thing, why the Hemi which is an OHV as well doesn't have the problem. I dont remember anyone bringing it in for that issue, while at GM we had atleast one person per day bring it in.

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted

My 2009 Sierra (5.3 non flex Z71) has always been an oil burner. Maybe around 50K miles a GM dealer replaced the driver side valve cover, still a burner. I'm past warranty, having had nothing else done to it, and not wanting to spend more than I need to to keep this my daily driver; what would you guys recommend for me to disable the AFM? I looked at the range AFM disabler, but I was wondering, being out of warranty, is there another product that everyone would recommend first.

Posted (edited)

I just threw a Range on mine last week. Found a great deal on eBay. Works as advertised. Haven't gone on a long towing run to see if it will cut the oil consumption I have when at sustained high RPMs.

Edited by Jsdirt
  • Like 1
Posted

^ How great a deal is a great deal? I saw were range also sells on amazon for a few bucks cheaper than on their site.

Posted

Paid $149 shipped - was cheaper than I could find anywhere else.

  • Like 1
Posted

Hard to believe its been 5 yrs since I asked that this poll be set up. What's harder to believe is, this issue is still going strong. I understand brand loyalty. I have owned Chevys all my life. But, that loyalty supposed to go both ways. Without customers you have no business. The 5.3 AFM should have been dropped, instead GM is counting on customers looking the other way. I meet people every day with NB Silverados, that when I ask if they are using oil, 7 out of 10 say yes and don't know what's going on till I tell them. Me, I took advice from a member here and got rid of the problem, an 07 NB that I had to go thru hades to get fixed. My 06 non AFM Silvy uses no oil.

  • Like 1
Posted

AFM will cause problems with these engines eventually. You can't shut cylinders down, and not expect it to be harder on the engine.

  • Like 1
Posted

^ How great a deal is a great deal? I saw were range also sells on amazon for a few bucks cheaper than on their site.

 

Also shop at "www.autoanything.com" They have free shipping & 20% off ($100 orders) deals all the time.

Posted

Thanks for the suggestions guys.

I spoke with the service manager at my local dealership and he was asking how often I change my oil to which I told him "when my truck tells me to (just like you told me to do when I bought the thing new)". He said "oh no, you have to change it every 3,000 miles". That seems extreme, not to mention expensive given the cost of full synthetic. Full synthetic is all that I have ran in my truck since new.

I own an agricultural business and employ a mechanic (not a GM mechanic mind you but a gear guy none the less). We got to discussing oils and he wondered aloud if the full synthetics and lite weights aren't also for EPA reasons and not so much because its a better product. My question for the forum is has anyone switched from the recommended 5W or synthetic?

  • Like 1
Posted

That's what my manual says:

('13 Silverado, I guess it should be similar to the 09')

post-107777-0-56838600-1459383533_thumb.png

 

post-107777-0-13885800-1459383522_thumb.png

 

I didn't look very hard but I couldn't find anything about an oil change every 3000mls.

 

so long

j-ten-ner

post-107777-0-13885800-1459383522_thumb.png

post-107777-0-56838600-1459383533_thumb.png

post-107777-0-13885800-1459383522_thumb.png

post-107777-0-56838600-1459383533_thumb.png

post-107777-0-13885800-1459383522_thumb.png

post-107777-0-56838600-1459383533_thumb.png

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...