Jump to content

Chit chat


SarahsGMC

Recommended Posts

Posted

After changing the oil on the Ford ( read winter beater) I can't understand how there can be people who actually think Fords are better. I can't think of one way they could possibly be better...I may have even invented a few new swear words.

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

  • Replies 9.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

They are better at breaking down and crappy reliability after 100,000 miles.. Which is why their resale value is always the worst.... Great vehicle if you want to own one for 3-5 years but after that.. HA!

Posted

I can't rip on Ford. I've owned plenty over the years, along side my GM products. GM does it's own share of stupid crap.

 

If your window switch fails in your '07 and up, can you just replace it with a new one? NOPE! Requires a computer reflash to work! Same with your FPCM - replace it with new, and the vehicle won't start! Reflash required. So if you're a DIY'er, you're paying $400 or whatever the part costs from GM .. then you're paying a shop a minimum of $120 to perform a reflash .. PLUS a tow since it won't run! You might get a Ford done cheaper since the subscription fee is less. Also, GM is famous for bricked ECUs if a reflash is interrupted. No recovery possible. Mostly on the early 21st century trucks. Real nice!

 

The software to download from GM if your happen to own a J2534 pass thru device: $55 for 2 days. Ford charges only $32.95 for 3 days. By way of comparison, Kia is $19. Toyota copied GM, BUT, their service data is 200% more open - they tell you everything and hide nothing. GM likes to keep too many secrets ...

 

Just for the cost of reflashing alone, I'd buy a Ford over a GM. I have to fix my own vehicles, remember.

 

 

I'm still driving my 31 year old FoMoCo product we've owned for 14 years. 239k miles, not a hint of blue smoke, original fuel pump & power steering pump, rear end has never been touched except for axle seals & maintenance, & transmission maintenance only too. Only things that fail after that length of time are plastic parts. They all dry up, become brittle, and crack.

 

Grand%20Marquis%203_zps50fdnpvt.jpg

Posted

Back in the 80s when Ford built simpler vehicles, they were not all that bad.

Posted

My dad has a few Ford trucks when I was growing up and one Chevy. He always bought old, used vehicles and wasn't brand loyal. As I remember the 72 Chevy pickup was very cool. Great styling, etc. The 77 and 78 ford were ok looking but I liked the Chevy. Seems like Ford has some design issues that they never seem to take care of. Their truck exhaust pipes always looked awkward..exiting oddly.

 

Electrical gremlins, corrosion on wires and goofy sounding starters.

Had my fair share of issues with the "twin-I beam" front suspension and king pins too.

Before I new better I bought a 1990 f150 with a 302 and a 5 speed. Nice looking truck and the it was cheap but they thing was so gutless I couldn't keep it at 70 on the expressway without down shifting lol.

I think reading too many off-road magazines at the time and being young and energetic lead me to thinking I should swap the engine out. My dad had a old 77 Ford LTD wagon with a 400 ci big block sitting in the weeds that he let me have.

Out came the 302 and in went the 400. Opps the motor mounts won't fit and the transmission bell housing needs to be bigger so I picked up a C6 trans. ( yeah I should have known that ahead of time)

I bought a NP 205 ( gear driven) transfer case because Four Wheeler magazine said they are almost bulletproof. Fabbed a new cross member because the original wouldn't work along with new driveshafts front and rear. Rebuilt the 400 with new everything except the crank, and installed a floor shift B & M shifter because the linkage location had changed.

My dad told me he counted 13 times that the engine went in and back out of the truck lol.

I guess long story short I learned I didn't like working on Fords and after all that work guess what..It still wasn't a Chevy ;)

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Posted

Just signed up for Sling TV, so far I like it.

You missed the window but DIRECTVs competition for sling had more channels and was $5 cheaper

Posted

You missed the window but DIRECTVs competition for sling had more channels and was $5 cheaper

 

 

Figures, maybe they'll offer it again. What's the name of it?

Posted

This brings back fond memories for me about how easy it was to swap around chevy engines and transmissions in the 70s and 80s when I was doing it a lot. I was an impala nut mostly, just finished putting a 454 in a 74 impala. At the time we had a salvage yard and came across a 77 nova 6cylinder that was clean. That weekend pulled the 454 and installed in the nova with very little effort. A week later a 78 camaro comes in that's wrecked with a good 350 with headers that gets installed in the impala. Fun times. Couldn't do that that easy with fords or dodge. You could have two different 351s with ford depending on where it was made. Dodge you had to change a k member to go from 6 to 8 cylinders. GM trucks were easy too

 

My dad has a few Ford trucks when I was growing up and one Chevy. He always bought old, used vehicles and wasn't brand loyal. As I remember the 72 Chevy pickup was very cool. Great styling, etc. The 77 and 78 ford were ok looking but I liked the Chevy. Seems like Ford has some design issues that they never seem to take care of. Their truck exhaust pipes always looked awkward..exiting oddly.

 

Electrical gremlins, corrosion on wires and goofy sounding starters.

Had my fair share of issues with the "twin-I beam" front suspension and king pins too.

Before I new better I bought a 1990 f150 with a 302 and a 5 speed. Nice looking truck and the it was cheap but they thing was so gutless I couldn't keep it at 70 on the expressway without down shifting lol.

I think reading too many off-road magazines at the time and being young and energetic lead me to thinking I should swap the engine out. My dad had a old 77 Ford LTD wagon with a 400 ci big block sitting in the weeds that he let me have.

Out came the 302 and in went the 400. Opps the motor mounts won't fit and the transmission bell housing needs to be bigger so I picked up a C6 trans. ( yeah I should have known that ahead of time)

I bought a NP 205 ( gear driven) transfer case because Four Wheeler magazine said they are almost bulletproof. Fabbed a new cross member because the original wouldn't work along with new driveshafts front and rear. Rebuilt the 400 with new everything except the crank, and installed a floor shift B & M shifter because the linkage location had changed.

My dad told me he counted 13 times that the engine went in and back out of the truck lol.

I guess long story short I learned I didn't like working on Fords and after all that work guess what..It still wasn't a Chevy ;)

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Posted

I really miss those days. Can't believe how crazy the prices have got on even 1980's vehicles. Ridiculous.

 

I should have filled my yard with cars from the 60's to 80's. People couldn't give 80's cars away fast enough in the late 90's. A dime a dozen in the local want ads. Used to see several of my Grand Marquis' for sale for $800. Now $4k if they run and drive. Monte Carlo, Grand Prix, Cutlass for $1k or less ... now seeing some for $8k and up!

 

Maybe I should start stockpiling the rolling tupperware that's on the road today. If history is any indicator, even this crap will be worth quite a bit in a couple decades. Will be here before we know it. My truck is already 10! Can't even wrap my head around that. Got friends with kids approaching their 30's - where did the time go!?! :dunno:

Posted

Grand marquis is my all time favorite Ford (I like big cars) I know it's a merc. The reason is you could use mustang go fast parts and no one would know they would just see tail lights. I used to have a blast with my impalas.

Posted

Yeah, the only visible difference between the 2 engines is the intake plenum faces the passenger side on the Fox, while it faces the driver's side on the Panther. I've always wanted to do that upgrade, but it's my wife's 3-season commuter car. She's content with the 140 HP / 230 Ft.Lbs.. :lol:

 

I always said I'd hot-rod it when the engine grenades. A nice 351C if I can find one, carb, and aftermarket ignition. Been waiting 8 years .... still hasn't happened! It's like the Energizer bunny ... only blue. :D

Posted

So I somewhat inadvertently grabbed a hybrid truck at work today. I didn't even know we had them here yet. What boggles my mind is it runs only on electric, so when the battery dies you have to pull over and wait for the gas generator (or whatever, sounds like a generator) to charge the battery. They said it goes about 100 miles. Yeah not on the highway it doesn't. Used 40%+ battery for a 30 minute trip that was only 20ish miles. Took over an hour break earlier since I was down to 5%. Taking another break now to charge it again. I've only done 55.5 miles so far and I've used probably 80% battery. Good old brown doing stuff that doesn't make sense. Also it's super weird being in near silent vehicle, and quite unsettling for me. Especially with how loud our diesels and even our gasses are.

 

a4644b246829820e93e0c1b4da57573c.jpg

Posted

That's great work 15 Hrs get paid for 8 while it charges every hour. Hey wait a minute, what's charging it a gas generator?! I must have read it wrong!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a 2000 Silverado 1500 LS, whenever I put it into reverse and also in drive it clunks, the truck also feels sluggish when driving. Any advice/ideas ?
    • Looks like it's riveted to me. What is wrong with that 1? Welcome to the Forum!
    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...