Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It been a while, but here is my light bars I installed. 30" behind the grille and curved 54" up top:

f309a10d510b8dc84b312e3c053e44c7.jpg

c81614538d9f1bebf641316ae39fee74.jpg0f4bb85fe8849624fc358e28c8012580.jpg

51f076e90c63bb3cd042f4f7ae9102c3.jpg770edb236b885f3a704eec8b0468d7a3.jpg203db1dfcf7445249a783c2796373cc0.jpg7e647a1c2603fd8cc3bd72729e8842fe.jpg91f63f3ef947ecfe74a54589bde46e82.jpgac4ae56562806368155072a600db79b2.jpgd14fd2d06bcfd7d514ebe266b47fd955.jpg

 

What brand light bar did you go with on top?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Thanks guys, I was told to run no lower than 60 or I'll get bad wear. So far 7500 in they look ok but then again 7500 is nothing especially when you rotate every 3000

Rotate every 3000 miles??. Ive always thought 7500. I think my tire shop would hate me if i did that ... but who cares. Need to look in to this
Posted

My shop who lifted it said on muds you have to stay up on it 3-4k or you will get funky ass wear.... They do it for free so who cares right?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

d15c057215cffd4516be991d2ba272e9.jpg

4df33623fcc7188859a345806d795c22.jpg

New to the forum and thought I'd post a couple of my 2014 Silverado LT. Nothing too special but it suits all my needs. Best truck I've ever owned so far.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nice looking truck. Plan on doing anything to it?

Posted (edited)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

Its not really a true brand that he went with. He got the lights from HARBORLED on instagram. They sell factory direct and have some really great prices on stuff, its the shipping costs that are a killer. But just to put into perspective on how much light bars from the guy costs, I asked for a quote for a 20", 30", and curved 55" bar, all using Cree LEDs and 3D optics, all 3 bars shipped to my front door was right around $600.

 

If you want I can email you the latest price sheet with everything that they sell

 

EDIT: the beam patterns and outputs of the bars with 3D optics are incredible. He and I met up when he got the 30" bar behind his grille installed and its a pure spot beam bar, it looked a lot like Rigid's hyper spot beam pattern. I haven't seen the 55" curved yet though.

Edited by Mike1220
Posted

f3ce6fcaf5baeb612fe0a4f6b31e222e.jpg2b9dc7b91b26fcc743fe6579c07a3cb0.jpg451ff35a2a4c0d2053e94deaa2fbd599.jpg

Yep Mikes got his facts straight. these are the light bars and they are from HarborLed. Ask for Cristian and he will hook you up, but shipping from China is not cheap at all, sometimes it's more than the actual light costs. I have been buying from him for a while and never had a problem. The optics are not like the crappy flat looking ones they are the new 3D optics and also my 30" light bar has optics that rigid industries uses.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Posted

f3ce6fcaf5baeb612fe0a4f6b31e222e.jpg2b9dc7b91b26fcc743fe6579c07a3cb0.jpg451ff35a2a4c0d2053e94deaa2fbd599.jpg

Yep Mikes got his facts straight. these are the light bars and they are from HarborLed. Ask for Cristian and he will hook you up, but shipping from China is not cheap at all, sometimes it's more than the actual light costs. I have been buying from him for a while and never had a problem. The optics are not like the crappy flat looking ones they are the new 3D optics and also my 30" light bar has optics that rigid industries uses.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

what lift and tires are you running?

Posted

f3ce6fcaf5baeb612fe0a4f6b31e222e.jpg2b9dc7b91b26fcc743fe6579c07a3cb0.jpg451ff35a2a4c0d2053e94deaa2fbd599.jpg

Yep Mikes got his facts straight. these are the light bars and they are from HarborLed. Ask for Cristian and he will hook you up, but shipping from China is not cheap at all, sometimes it's more than the actual light costs. I have been buying from him for a while and never had a problem. The optics are not like the crappy flat looking ones they are the new 3D optics and also my 30" light bar has optics that rigid industries uses.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Did you consider a double row bar behind the AT grille? Would it fit or would the slats block half the light?

Posted

f3ce6fcaf5baeb612fe0a4f6b31e222e.jpgYep Mikes got his facts straight. these are the light bars and they are from HarborLed. Ask for Cristian and he will hook you up, but shipping from China is not cheap at all, sometimes it's more than the actual light costs. I have been buying from him for a while and never had a problem. The optics are not like the crappy flat looking ones they are the new 3D optics and also my 30" light bar has optics that rigid industries uses.

 

 

How did you mount the light bar behind the grill?

Posted

 

what lift and tires are you running?

 

Did you consider a double row bar behind the AT grille? Would it fit or would the slats block half the light?

How did you mount the light bar behind the grill?

I installed the Rough Country 2.5" level up front with 305/55R20 trail grapplers and 20x9 +14 offset fuel Mavericks

 

I wanted to do a double row behind it but it wasn't going to fit the way I wanted it to fit through the slots so that's why I went with the single row

 

I mounted a piece of angle iron to the two metal slanted bars behind the grille once you pull it off and I used some longer side mounts to push the bar close to the back of the grille. There is a thread on here somewhere with lots of ideas on how to do it. This is not my truck its a Silverado but it is basically the same way I did mine dd24d56ac068ac4475a082d00e5c271a.jpg

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

 

I wanted to do a double row behind it but it wasn't going to fit the way I wanted it to fit through the slots so that's why I went with the single row

 

 

Good to know... I measured the Rigid Lights at SEMA and the height of the lights are 2" not including frame.... The Gaps in the AT grille are exactly 2" but I would love to see how it would fit before purchasing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,646 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...