Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Check out the Airaid MIT. The truck already has a CAI, you just need the tube and a lower restriction filter to get the same benefits as a $300 CAI. Any HP or MPG gains are marginal at best though. If you check the data, most CAI "performance improvements" happen at 5,000 rpm or above.

  • Like 1
  • 3 months later...
Posted

I saw a video on the airaid air filter system and it looked pretty cool. I don't know much about this so I was wondering..

 

What are the benefits if any?

Which is the best, airaid, KN or another?

Will it void my warranty?

Posted

Zero benefit other than not having to replace a paper filter every 24K. Most dry oil filters actually let larger particulates in the engine....IMO these products are snake oil and the benefits are nothing more than a placebo effect

  • Like 7
Posted

Steve you obviously have been drinking the juice from what other people have said. I did back to back test on a dyno on the same day with the stock setup and a airaid setup on my Vette, 6 runs total and all runs showed the Airaid picked up 8rwhp on average. Cant see where that is hype and does nothing???

 

I have ran a K&N or some similar brand CAI setup for better part of 15 years and never once had an issue with a oiled or dry filter. Once again that is nothing more than old wives tale of them doing more harm than good as a way to knock down the aftermarket industry and push towards OEM stuff. If they were so bad why does GM now offer CAI kits for the Camaro's as well?

 

To the OP I will be ordering the Airaid CAI kit this week for my truck, on the 5.3 model the trucks showed to pick up 25rwhp. Even if I pick up 10rwhp I will be happy with the extra performance.

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

Not drinking any koolaid...plenty of empirical evidence to support my statement. Put your vette up on a Dino and remove the air box completely, and you'll see an even bigger output to the wheels. The point is, very little is gained by a CAI, Checkout bobistheoilguy.com, plenty of discussions there on the cons of any CAI. . Also, food for thought, why wouldn't the manufacturers just throw on a CAI if it improves horsepower? Chances are the long term negative affect outweigh the short term benefit

Edited by Silverado Steve
  • Like 1
Posted

Blackbear did some testing earlier this yr and showed adding a CAI does increase overall power. Some more than others but they are not all hype. The details are in the black ear section feel free to check it out.

 

Cold air inductions (CAI) is a popular brand on the camaro side. Definitely can tell a difference with mine.

 

zesagevu.jpg

 

 

Ryan

  • Like 1
Posted

The main reason why mfgs don't add them is due to the extra noise (albeit very small) and cost.

 

 

Ryan

Posted (edited)

TJ

 

I to have some experience with CAI's and although your system did pick up RWHP, you were also dealing with a completely different setup on your vette. The vette system is out in front of the radiator not sucking in any engine heat, almost a ramair system if you will. Ramair systems are the best, you want the engine pulling in as cool and close to ambient temperature as possible and those systems would do that. Not to mention the faster you go the more air is allowed in and wala more hp.

 

Alot of the CAI systems you see on cars are none other then a pipe connected to a cone in the engine bay. These are the systems that suck in mostly hot air and allow for minimal to no peformance gains (it can actually lose power at a stop because of the higher intake temps and timing being pulled). Many GTO owners saw little to no gains with your standard CAI and there were many people that data logged temps to prove it. Worse can be said for the chrome metal intake pipes, those get hot and in turn your cold air gets heated up in the pipe.

 

The vette has a great intake setup, straight in away from radiant engine heat. That is the reason vararam followed a similar path with their intake systems, shortest coolest route. Many vararam (and home made setups that followed the same logic) would see some hp gains on the dyno but it really showed moving and in the trap speeds (just seeing the IAT's nice and low).

 

Best bet for a working CAI would for it to not be metal, sealed off from the engine to not suck in the heat and even better take fresh air from the front of the truck or car. Other wise you are getting a nice sucking sound but no real performance gains.

 

Not sure if it holds true with the trucks since their engine bay is so large but the same concept would apply. If you aren't into off roading something like this would be best

http://www.vararam.com/tri-power/tri-power.html

 

Take it for what you want but I spent alot of time dealing with the GTO & LS community (vette included) and the same principal applies for all motor vehicles.

 

For those wanting to save a few bucks and are only doing a few minimal bolt on mods, many people would get good results just by removing the stock intake pipe and replacing it with a smooth plastic pipe (the stock pipe is restrictive with all the chambers and rough bends) then drilling in a few holes to get more fresh air from the outside air intakes and using a drop in filter. The stock box setup will provide plenty of flow for minimal to moderate mods, it won't be a choking point.

 

Ya'll have a great christmas.

 

Tyler

 

PS, just seeing some of the posts above while I was typing and it shows many use a sealed off set up which is exaclty what I was pointing at. Nice to see one just replaces the pipe with a new filter and gets similar gains.

 

When were the IAT's taken? I wonder what they were at idle after a minute of idling on a warm truck? I am guessing they were taken during the run?

 

Volant was always pretty good because of it being enclosed, many follow the same principle now.

Edited by amxguy1970
Posted

The main reason why mfgs don't add them is due to the extra noise (albeit very small) and cost.

 

 

Ryan

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree, when it comes to any muscle car or v-8 power plant noise engine noise is the last thing any buyer would really care about. The truth is a CAI doesn't filter to the same effect as a paper filter, hence manufactures don't want the added liability. Hence benefit vs cost...the added 8 hp doesn't outweigh the cost of advanced engine wear. If your truck sees it's days in a field or dusty road, that's significant vs a muscle car on a road, drag strip or track.

Posted

You can have gains just by replacing the intake tube and sticking with stock air box

Posted

^^ This. In BlackBear's test the MIT did really well. I have just the tube on my 2006 with the stock air box. AFE Pro Dry is a good filter you can replace the stock one with.

Posted (edited)

I saw 11rwhp gain with a CAI with my Cobra Mustang. They are not hype.... They do add HP. Where you see the benifits; if your looking at it from a performance state of mind, a CAI and a tune will net you the most HP.

 

I don't see why a CAI wouldn't add HP to these trucks too.

Edited by haider320
Posted

TJ

 

I to have some experience with CAI's and although your system did pick up RWHP, you were also dealing with a completely different setup on your vette. The vette system is out in front of the radiator not sucking in any engine heat, almost a ramair system if you will. Ramair systems are the best, you want the engine pulling in as cool and close to ambient temperature as possible and those systems would do that. Not to mention the faster you go the more air is allowed in and wala more hp.

 

Alot of the CAI systems you see on cars are none other then a pipe connected to a cone in the engine bay. These are the systems that suck in mostly hot air and allow for minimal to no peformance gains (it can actually lose power at a stop because of the higher intake temps and timing being pulled). Many GTO owners saw little to no gains with your standard CAI and there were many people that data logged temps to prove it. Worse can be said for the chrome metal intake pipes, those get hot and in turn your cold air gets heated up in the pipe.

 

The vette has a great intake setup, straight in away from radiant engine heat. That is the reason vararam followed a similar path with their intake systems, shortest coolest route. Many vararam (and home made setups that followed the same logic) would see some hp gains on the dyno but it really showed moving and in the trap speeds (just seeing the IAT's nice and low).

 

Best bet for a working CAI would for it to not be metal, sealed off from the engine to not suck in the heat and even better take fresh air from the front of the truck or car. Other wise you are getting a nice sucking sound but no real performance gains.

 

Not sure if it holds true with the trucks since their engine bay is so large but the same concept would apply. If you aren't into off roading something like this would be best

http://www.vararam.com/tri-power/tri-power.html

 

Take it for what you want but I spent alot of time dealing with the GTO & LS community (vette included) and the same principal applies for all motor vehicles.

 

For those wanting to save a few bucks and are only doing a few minimal bolt on mods, many people would get good results just by removing the stock intake pipe and replacing it with a smooth plastic pipe (the stock pipe is restrictive with all the chambers and rough bends) then drilling in a few holes to get more fresh air from the outside air intakes and using a drop in filter. The stock box setup will provide plenty of flow for minimal to moderate mods, it won't be a choking point.

 

Ya'll have a great christmas.

 

Tyler

 

PS, just seeing some of the posts above while I was typing and it shows many use a sealed off set up which is exaclty what I was pointing at. Nice to see one just replaces the pipe with a new filter and gets similar gains.

 

When were the IAT's taken? I wonder what they were at idle after a minute of idling on a warm truck? I am guessing they were taken during the run?

 

Volant was always pretty good because of it being enclosed, many follow the same principle now.

 

Actually the Vette is no where near a ram air setup, it is completely sealed off and the air filter sits right on top of the radiator. Only way to even remotely get a "ram air" eccect is to cut open the lower air damn which most wont do in case of running thru water.

 

 

 

Not drinking any koolaid...plenty of empirical evidence to support my statement. Put your vette up on a Dino and remove the air box completely, and you'll see an even bigger output to the wheels. The point is, very little is gained by a CAI, Checkout bobistheoilguy.com, plenty of discussions there on the cons of any CAI. . Also, food for thought, why wouldn't the manufacturers just throw on a CAI if it improves horsepower? Chances are the long term negative affect outweigh the short term benefit

 

Coming from an engineering standpoint, lots of reason as to why GM wont put one on from the factory. NVH test, CARB/CAFE requirements, and every engine setup has to be tested and ran thru EPA testing process to get certified before the engine can be release for production. That all is factored into the cost of production. Why would GM or any other manufacture spend the money when the aftermarket can do it a lot cheaper?

 

 

 

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree, when it comes to any muscle car or v-8 power plant noise engine noise is the last thing any buyer would really care about. The truth is a CAI doesn't filter to the same effect as a paper filter, hence manufactures don't want the added liability. Hence benefit vs cost...the added 8 hp doesn't outweigh the cost of advanced engine wear. If your truck sees it's days in a field or dusty road, that's significant vs a muscle car on a road, drag strip or track.

 

I have yet to ever see any advanced engine wear, I have owned several cars over the 100,000 mile range that had K&N style filters on them with no issues, dad has a 1996 Yukon that's had a K&N filter on it since new and has 500,000 miles on it. Combustion temps are well over 2000° degrees, I highly doubt any small specs of dirt cause any issues at all.

 

 

I saw 11rwhp gain with a CAI with my Cobra Mustang. They are not hype.... They do add HP. Where you see the benifits; if your looking at it from a performance state of mind, a CAI and a tune will net you the most HP.

 

I don't see why a CAI wouldn't add HP to these trucks too.

 

I am with you, pretty sure I will know in the next week or so once mine comes in. Airaid doesn't have a MIT tube yet and for the hook up I am getting on the whole kit I will just use the kit instead.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,913
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Smitty462
    Newest Member
    Smitty462
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 705 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
    • Hello from Australia Just sharing that there is now a way to delete the active shutters entirely with just a plug in module. Opens up tons of room to light bars etc.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...