Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Check out the Airaid MIT. The truck already has a CAI, you just need the tube and a lower restriction filter to get the same benefits as a $300 CAI. Any HP or MPG gains are marginal at best though. If you check the data, most CAI "performance improvements" happen at 5,000 rpm or above.

  • Like 1
  • 3 months later...
Posted

I saw a video on the airaid air filter system and it looked pretty cool. I don't know much about this so I was wondering..

 

What are the benefits if any?

Which is the best, airaid, KN or another?

Will it void my warranty?

Posted

Zero benefit other than not having to replace a paper filter every 24K. Most dry oil filters actually let larger particulates in the engine....IMO these products are snake oil and the benefits are nothing more than a placebo effect

  • Like 7
Posted

Steve you obviously have been drinking the juice from what other people have said. I did back to back test on a dyno on the same day with the stock setup and a airaid setup on my Vette, 6 runs total and all runs showed the Airaid picked up 8rwhp on average. Cant see where that is hype and does nothing???

 

I have ran a K&N or some similar brand CAI setup for better part of 15 years and never once had an issue with a oiled or dry filter. Once again that is nothing more than old wives tale of them doing more harm than good as a way to knock down the aftermarket industry and push towards OEM stuff. If they were so bad why does GM now offer CAI kits for the Camaro's as well?

 

To the OP I will be ordering the Airaid CAI kit this week for my truck, on the 5.3 model the trucks showed to pick up 25rwhp. Even if I pick up 10rwhp I will be happy with the extra performance.

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

Not drinking any koolaid...plenty of empirical evidence to support my statement. Put your vette up on a Dino and remove the air box completely, and you'll see an even bigger output to the wheels. The point is, very little is gained by a CAI, Checkout bobistheoilguy.com, plenty of discussions there on the cons of any CAI. . Also, food for thought, why wouldn't the manufacturers just throw on a CAI if it improves horsepower? Chances are the long term negative affect outweigh the short term benefit

Edited by Silverado Steve
  • Like 1
Posted

Blackbear did some testing earlier this yr and showed adding a CAI does increase overall power. Some more than others but they are not all hype. The details are in the black ear section feel free to check it out.

 

Cold air inductions (CAI) is a popular brand on the camaro side. Definitely can tell a difference with mine.

 

zesagevu.jpg

 

 

Ryan

  • Like 1
Posted

The main reason why mfgs don't add them is due to the extra noise (albeit very small) and cost.

 

 

Ryan

Posted (edited)

TJ

 

I to have some experience with CAI's and although your system did pick up RWHP, you were also dealing with a completely different setup on your vette. The vette system is out in front of the radiator not sucking in any engine heat, almost a ramair system if you will. Ramair systems are the best, you want the engine pulling in as cool and close to ambient temperature as possible and those systems would do that. Not to mention the faster you go the more air is allowed in and wala more hp.

 

Alot of the CAI systems you see on cars are none other then a pipe connected to a cone in the engine bay. These are the systems that suck in mostly hot air and allow for minimal to no peformance gains (it can actually lose power at a stop because of the higher intake temps and timing being pulled). Many GTO owners saw little to no gains with your standard CAI and there were many people that data logged temps to prove it. Worse can be said for the chrome metal intake pipes, those get hot and in turn your cold air gets heated up in the pipe.

 

The vette has a great intake setup, straight in away from radiant engine heat. That is the reason vararam followed a similar path with their intake systems, shortest coolest route. Many vararam (and home made setups that followed the same logic) would see some hp gains on the dyno but it really showed moving and in the trap speeds (just seeing the IAT's nice and low).

 

Best bet for a working CAI would for it to not be metal, sealed off from the engine to not suck in the heat and even better take fresh air from the front of the truck or car. Other wise you are getting a nice sucking sound but no real performance gains.

 

Not sure if it holds true with the trucks since their engine bay is so large but the same concept would apply. If you aren't into off roading something like this would be best

http://www.vararam.com/tri-power/tri-power.html

 

Take it for what you want but I spent alot of time dealing with the GTO & LS community (vette included) and the same principal applies for all motor vehicles.

 

For those wanting to save a few bucks and are only doing a few minimal bolt on mods, many people would get good results just by removing the stock intake pipe and replacing it with a smooth plastic pipe (the stock pipe is restrictive with all the chambers and rough bends) then drilling in a few holes to get more fresh air from the outside air intakes and using a drop in filter. The stock box setup will provide plenty of flow for minimal to moderate mods, it won't be a choking point.

 

Ya'll have a great christmas.

 

Tyler

 

PS, just seeing some of the posts above while I was typing and it shows many use a sealed off set up which is exaclty what I was pointing at. Nice to see one just replaces the pipe with a new filter and gets similar gains.

 

When were the IAT's taken? I wonder what they were at idle after a minute of idling on a warm truck? I am guessing they were taken during the run?

 

Volant was always pretty good because of it being enclosed, many follow the same principle now.

Edited by amxguy1970
Posted

The main reason why mfgs don't add them is due to the extra noise (albeit very small) and cost.

 

 

Ryan

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree, when it comes to any muscle car or v-8 power plant noise engine noise is the last thing any buyer would really care about. The truth is a CAI doesn't filter to the same effect as a paper filter, hence manufactures don't want the added liability. Hence benefit vs cost...the added 8 hp doesn't outweigh the cost of advanced engine wear. If your truck sees it's days in a field or dusty road, that's significant vs a muscle car on a road, drag strip or track.

Posted

You can have gains just by replacing the intake tube and sticking with stock air box

Posted

^^ This. In BlackBear's test the MIT did really well. I have just the tube on my 2006 with the stock air box. AFE Pro Dry is a good filter you can replace the stock one with.

Posted (edited)

I saw 11rwhp gain with a CAI with my Cobra Mustang. They are not hype.... They do add HP. Where you see the benifits; if your looking at it from a performance state of mind, a CAI and a tune will net you the most HP.

 

I don't see why a CAI wouldn't add HP to these trucks too.

Edited by haider320
Posted

TJ

 

I to have some experience with CAI's and although your system did pick up RWHP, you were also dealing with a completely different setup on your vette. The vette system is out in front of the radiator not sucking in any engine heat, almost a ramair system if you will. Ramair systems are the best, you want the engine pulling in as cool and close to ambient temperature as possible and those systems would do that. Not to mention the faster you go the more air is allowed in and wala more hp.

 

Alot of the CAI systems you see on cars are none other then a pipe connected to a cone in the engine bay. These are the systems that suck in mostly hot air and allow for minimal to no peformance gains (it can actually lose power at a stop because of the higher intake temps and timing being pulled). Many GTO owners saw little to no gains with your standard CAI and there were many people that data logged temps to prove it. Worse can be said for the chrome metal intake pipes, those get hot and in turn your cold air gets heated up in the pipe.

 

The vette has a great intake setup, straight in away from radiant engine heat. That is the reason vararam followed a similar path with their intake systems, shortest coolest route. Many vararam (and home made setups that followed the same logic) would see some hp gains on the dyno but it really showed moving and in the trap speeds (just seeing the IAT's nice and low).

 

Best bet for a working CAI would for it to not be metal, sealed off from the engine to not suck in the heat and even better take fresh air from the front of the truck or car. Other wise you are getting a nice sucking sound but no real performance gains.

 

Not sure if it holds true with the trucks since their engine bay is so large but the same concept would apply. If you aren't into off roading something like this would be best

http://www.vararam.com/tri-power/tri-power.html

 

Take it for what you want but I spent alot of time dealing with the GTO & LS community (vette included) and the same principal applies for all motor vehicles.

 

For those wanting to save a few bucks and are only doing a few minimal bolt on mods, many people would get good results just by removing the stock intake pipe and replacing it with a smooth plastic pipe (the stock pipe is restrictive with all the chambers and rough bends) then drilling in a few holes to get more fresh air from the outside air intakes and using a drop in filter. The stock box setup will provide plenty of flow for minimal to moderate mods, it won't be a choking point.

 

Ya'll have a great christmas.

 

Tyler

 

PS, just seeing some of the posts above while I was typing and it shows many use a sealed off set up which is exaclty what I was pointing at. Nice to see one just replaces the pipe with a new filter and gets similar gains.

 

When were the IAT's taken? I wonder what they were at idle after a minute of idling on a warm truck? I am guessing they were taken during the run?

 

Volant was always pretty good because of it being enclosed, many follow the same principle now.

 

Actually the Vette is no where near a ram air setup, it is completely sealed off and the air filter sits right on top of the radiator. Only way to even remotely get a "ram air" eccect is to cut open the lower air damn which most wont do in case of running thru water.

 

 

 

Not drinking any koolaid...plenty of empirical evidence to support my statement. Put your vette up on a Dino and remove the air box completely, and you'll see an even bigger output to the wheels. The point is, very little is gained by a CAI, Checkout bobistheoilguy.com, plenty of discussions there on the cons of any CAI. . Also, food for thought, why wouldn't the manufacturers just throw on a CAI if it improves horsepower? Chances are the long term negative affect outweigh the short term benefit

 

Coming from an engineering standpoint, lots of reason as to why GM wont put one on from the factory. NVH test, CARB/CAFE requirements, and every engine setup has to be tested and ran thru EPA testing process to get certified before the engine can be release for production. That all is factored into the cost of production. Why would GM or any other manufacture spend the money when the aftermarket can do it a lot cheaper?

 

 

 

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree, when it comes to any muscle car or v-8 power plant noise engine noise is the last thing any buyer would really care about. The truth is a CAI doesn't filter to the same effect as a paper filter, hence manufactures don't want the added liability. Hence benefit vs cost...the added 8 hp doesn't outweigh the cost of advanced engine wear. If your truck sees it's days in a field or dusty road, that's significant vs a muscle car on a road, drag strip or track.

 

I have yet to ever see any advanced engine wear, I have owned several cars over the 100,000 mile range that had K&N style filters on them with no issues, dad has a 1996 Yukon that's had a K&N filter on it since new and has 500,000 miles on it. Combustion temps are well over 2000° degrees, I highly doubt any small specs of dirt cause any issues at all.

 

 

I saw 11rwhp gain with a CAI with my Cobra Mustang. They are not hype.... They do add HP. Where you see the benifits; if your looking at it from a performance state of mind, a CAI and a tune will net you the most HP.

 

I don't see why a CAI wouldn't add HP to these trucks too.

 

I am with you, pretty sure I will know in the next week or so once mine comes in. Airaid doesn't have a MIT tube yet and for the hook up I am getting on the whole kit I will just use the kit instead.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
    • I knew a guy in the early 80's that bought a new Monte Carlo and ran it a 100,000 miles without ever changing the filter or the oil. Just kept adding. It looked like that inside.     
    • Good evening. I was lucky enough to get passed down to me a 2007 GMC LBZ that was my great uncle's. While the underside and rockers are more or less gone I feel like with time I can restore it to working order since it only has 110,000 miles and he put nearly every option he could get without getting the new body style since he did not trust DEF. So far I have done everything I can think of but when I put the key into the ignition nothing happens. I put 2 brand new batteries in it. Cleaned the terminals. Check all the fuses and relays and they all pass with my multimeter. I know I'm missing something that I just cant think of. The only odd thing is the OBD2 port works which makes me think its not the mega fuse. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...