Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

The only difference is the throttle body size ... and you can make it fit with a little negotiating

 

Has anybody checked to see if the stock lid of the airbox is the same part number between the 5.3 and 6.2? A difference there could affect MAF calibration.

Posted

I have the volant and it fits good and the sensor is less then an inch from where the factory mounting is. only thing is that the 6.2l factory exhaust is so quiet that you hear the intake on a plus note the intake does make a decent rumble under wot

Posted

 

Has anybody checked to see if the stock lid of the airbox is the same part number between the 5.3 and 6.2? A difference there could affect MAF calibration.

Jon,

Have you installed an intake and re calibrated your MAF yet? If so, what intake did you use and about what percent did it change and which way was it off?

Posted

No, not yet. I'm just making sure to eliminate any issues there might be using a 5.3 intake on a 6.2. If the stock part is the same, it won't matter--they either made it correctly to have minimal effect on calibration or they didn't for either engine.

 

The Corvette 6.2's tables are very different from the truck 6.2. By the looks of the numbers, the Vette has a larger diameter tube than the trucks. Some aftermarket CAI's being developed for the C7 aren't going to try to keep the same calibration--they'll come with new tables for the user to enter into the tune. I don't see anybody going through that much effort for the trucks.

Posted (edited)

No, not yet. I'm just making sure to eliminate any issues there might be using a 5.3 intake on a 6.2. If the stock part is the same, it won't matter--they either made it correctly to have minimal effect on calibration or they didn't for either engine.

 

The Corvette 6.2's tables are very different from the truck 6.2. By the looks of the numbers, the Vette has a larger diameter tube than the trucks. Some aftermarket CAI's being developed for the C7 aren't going to try to keep the same calibration--they'll come with new tables for the user to enter into the tune. I don't see anybody going through that much effort for the trucks.

The corvette engine is also different so that will explain some of it because anytime you change the efficiency of the Pump you will have to scale the source that feeds it...but you are right, it's not just the size but the Vette will have more of a direct path from filter to TB... For instance, pull up the calibrations for the 2004 CTSV and 2004 Z06 Vette, the only difference in the two is the intake path and exhaust, MAF calibrations are quite a bit different... Edited by TDT
Posted

Actually, the C7 doesn’t have a nice straight shot like the prior Vettes:

 

54-74201_400.jpg

 

Similar to ours but shorter and larger diameter as well. It sits right behind the radiator where hot air is constantly blown on the tube though. Not the best setup, but not easy to fix either.

 

Anyway, yes, mainly the different intake manifold on the Vette is going to substantially change VE across the board due to the shorter runners. This results in big changes in the timing maps as well. And since the intake tubes are also the MAF housings on these things, any change to diameter or shape there will change the calibration of the sensor.

 

I worry a bit about the placement of the MAF so close to the transition in the C7 AFE intake above--it looks to me like it may cause the underreporting of air if stock calibration is used. They do it more gracefully with the truck intake (but the longer tube gives them more room to work with).

Posted

First post, just ordered the Volant, will update after i get it installed.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Has anyone besides YQatari modified the Airaid tube #200-996 for the previous generation trucks to fit the factory 14 air box? I have the Volant CAI and like a previous member said it sounds like drowning wookies at partial throttle. I am thinking about getting the Airaid tube and tapping in a couple of these, any thoughts?

post-125283-0-83565600-1399341885_thumb.jpg

post-125283-0-83565600-1399341885_thumb.jpg

post-125283-0-83565600-1399341885_thumb.jpg

post-125283-0-83565600-1399341885_thumb.jpg

Posted (edited)

^^^^

 

I pulled my AFE Stage 2si, off....mostly due to the vibration. I modded the stock airbox by opening up the lower hole and removing the snorkel. I then added some medium density foam to seal the box to the fender like factory. It added a verrrrry slight increase in noise for the better.

 

I actually think that lowend is better w/o the AFE but that might have something to do with being un-tuned and mapping possibly being off (the MAF sensor is moved slightly and the opening before it is wider than stock).

 

I think your idea would work fine.

Edited by 14'SilveradoLT
Posted

I installed a K&N CAI on my 2014 today. I was impressed with the growl on hard acceleration, and the mild noise on normal accel. I'm getting my dynomax cat back soon and I'm excited to see how everything works together.

Posted

I installed a K&N CAI on my 2014 today. I was impressed with the growl on hard acceleration, and the mild noise on normal accel. I'm getting my dynomax cat back soon and I'm excited to see how everything works together.

So are you impressed with it Ktapper? I'm torn between this system but swapping out the normal filter for a dry flow one and the AFE stage 2 system that 14'silveradolt is offering me. Damn decisions.

Posted

So are you impressed with it Ktapper? I'm torn between this system but swapping out the normal filter for a dry flow one and the AFE stage 2 system that 14'silveradolt is offering me. Damn decisions.

Yes, I am so far, but it is definitely loud when you get on it. I'm not sure how the AFE compares to the K&N but you probably can't go wrong with either.

Posted (edited)

Yes, I am so far, but it is definitely loud when you get on it. I'm not sure how the AFE compares to the K&N but you probably can't go wrong with either.

 

I'm not scared of loud. More thinking about cruising noise. Any annoying notes or tones when you're at a constant speed.

 

Also wondering how well it seats to the hood. None of these intakes are really CAI's but if the seal is pretty good to the hood, it should be sucking more air from the fender opening and from behind the light.

Edited by soltys
Posted

The AFE stage 2si isn't loud at cruise...on WOT and medium throttle it def has a more pronounced "growl". The AFE doesn't 'completely' seal to the fender. I added some weather stripping to make sure it sealed.

Posted

The AFE stage 2si isn't loud at cruise...on WOT and medium throttle it def has a more pronounced "growl". The AFE doesn't 'completely' seal to the fender. I added some weather stripping to make sure it sealed.

Can you post a picture of your weather stripping job?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I was the GM of a Lincoln Mercury dealership back in the 80's. The service lot was always full with "broken" ones. Plenty of transmissions, power windows and a/c repairs. The only one I'd consider owning would be the Marauder at this point and it certainly wouldn't be a daily driver.  My 2025 GMC Sierra 1500 Denali Ultimate is my "Lincoln Town Car" in my retirement. I want all the "stuff". Big infotainment screens, one touch power windows, Supercruise (I won't buy another vehicle without it), hands free pretty much everything. I'm going to swap my current truck for a 2027 Yukon Denali Ultimate so I can have the air suspension and surround vision recording along with all the other "stuff". 
    • Yep mine is on backorder also.
    • The Denali Ultimate's grille is tinted, but the "regular' Denali has a bright chrome grille like the current models.
    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...