Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

$1300 installed?! That's a deal. Looking for some NH or northern MA assistance. Shops around?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone

Posted (edited)

$1300 installed?! That's a deal. Looking for some NH or northern MA assistance. Shops around?

Sent from my iPhone

I just sent an email to AMP Research Customer Service through their Contact Us page and Joe reached out to me and recommended the installer to me.

Joe Ledezma <[email protected]>

Joe Ledezma | Sales and Technical Support

AMP RESEARCH | Innovation in MotionT Series | from Lund International

15651 Mosher Ave. | Tustin, CA 92780

(949) 221-4181 P | (949) 221-0043 F | amp-research.com

Edited by chuckl1218
  • Like 1
Posted

Just installed the factory 4" chrine/black steps on my '14 LT z71 w all star package. It looks awesome! I'll post pics in a bit!

  • Like 1
Posted

Has anyone put the Amp Power step on a regular cab?

Do they make them for a regular pickup? I haven't seen it.

Posted

Do they make them for a regular pickup? I haven't seen it.

 

They only make one size now. For the Double Cab you have to cut them to size, so for the RC, just trim more. Or leave them longer to act as a bed side step.

Posted

They only make one size now. For the Double Cab you have to cut them to size, so for the RC, just trim more. Or leave them longer to act as a bed side step.

Thanks. Do you think they would be strong enough to use as a side step on regular cabs and would there be the proper mounting area on the truck (mount around the bed) to make it work?

 

Has anyone try to install one on a regular pickup? Any problems cutting it down or using it as a side step as well?

Posted

Thanks. Do you think they would be strong enough to use as a side step on regular cabs and would there be the proper mounting area on the truck (mount around the bed) to make it work?

 

Has anyone try to install one on a regular pickup? Any problems cutting it down or using it as a side step as well?

I guess you'd have to crawl under there and look at the mount points. Or take some pics and put them up. As for the leaving them long idea, I'm not sure if there is clearance under that portion of the bed or if they line up. I have seen RC with amp steps on other forums. All depends on possible mount locations underneath I guess.
Posted

I've had good experience talking to AMP customer service. Why not reach out to them via their web site and ask?

Posted (edited)

Also not really a big fan of auto steps. Sure they look cool when they lower, but regular steps give rocker protection. Especially when it's not lifted. Plus auto steps is just 1 more electrical thing that can mess up and then you won't have a step or it will stick in the lowered position. There's already enough sensors and electrical in this truck lol. Same reason why I went for the one piece rear window since for the past few years the rear sliding window was power instead of manual.

Edited by SilveradoGuy85
Posted

Also not really a big fan of auto steps. Sure they look cool when they lower, but regular steps give rocker protection. Especially when it's not lifted. Plus auto steps is just 1 more electrical thing that can mess up and then you won't have a step or it will stick in the lowered position. There's already enough sensors and electrical in this truck lol. Same reason why I went for the one piece rear window since for the past few years the rear sliding window was power instead of manual.

 

Although, even when the boards are retracted, they still provide some protection of the rocker panels, from the bottom anyway. As much as a steel tube? don't know, but the internal baffle design in the aluminum steps is definitely strong. But yes, 1 more electrical thing to worry over, but so far AMP has had amazing customer service and I wouldn't hesitate to think they wouldn't replace anything if it went out. It's all personal preference though.

Posted

 

Although, even when the boards are retracted, they still provide some protection of the rocker panels, from the bottom anyway. As much as a steel tube? don't know, but the internal baffle design in the aluminum steps is definitely strong. But yes, 1 more electrical thing to worry over, but so far AMP has had amazing customer service and I wouldn't hesitate to think they wouldn't replace anything if it went out. It's all personal preference though.

 

Oh I've heard nothing but good things about AMP so if I ever did get a set of auto steps it would be them, just not for me I guess. It wouldn't be a bad thing for a stock lift truck like mine though. But, I also have 0 patients and I see myself getting mad at the steps for not lowering quick enough lol. I don't use them for getting into the truck, but I ise mine because it's bed access so I'm about to get into my toolbox without climbing into the bed. I don't think I've seen a bed access auto step yet.

 

I know I won't get the big 3+" tube steps like I had on my 98. Even though the Westons did tuck closer to the body than I've seen with other brands I've also seen those tubes dented and bent pretty easily. I can tell if anything breaks on the N-fabs it will be the brackets or welds.

  • Like 1
Posted

Also not really a big fan of auto steps. Sure they look cool when they lower, but regular steps give rocker protection. Especially when it's not lifted. Plus auto steps is just 1 more electrical thing that can mess up and then you won't have a step or it will stick in the lowered position. There's already enough sensors and electrical in this truck lol. Same reason why I went for the one piece rear window since for the past few years the rear sliding window was power instead of manual.

 

You make some very good reason why not to get it especially when it is not made for a regular pickup.

Posted

 

You make some very good reason why not to get it especially when it is not made for a regular pickup.

 

Like I said, it's just not something I would do. Not saying it's stupid or doesn't make sense. I know AMP is a good company and haven't heard a bad thing about them yet. The other reason I went with regular steps is because I actually wanted steps that helped me reach into my toolbox. I don't need steps (yet lol) to get into the cab, just to reach into the toolbox without having to climb into the bed. Also other people do use them to get into the truck so it's not just for me. I also have yet to see AMP with auto steps that extend to the rear wheel like bed access steps to help reach into the bed or toolbox.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,913
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Smitty462
    Newest Member
    Smitty462
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 587 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...