Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I got one for you, my sister in law was driving her Hemi car thru Dallas and it quit. They haul it to the dealer, timing chain at 40,000 miles. They told my brother to put a tune in so it wouldnt go to v4 that's why the chain broke. He told to put that in writing. See where that goes. The are fixing it under warranty.

 

It's highly unlikely the dealership will recommend a tune for a vehicle still under manufacture warranty.. Let alone a tune in general. Do you know what tune the dealer said to install?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

It's almost out of warranty, any that keeps it going on all 8. Some dealers don't care if you have a tune.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I can't see how that caused it, any car with a stick would be hard on the timing chain. But that the reason they gave him.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

With a few more miles on peoples truck, I wanted to see if anyone else can feel the transition for V8 to V4 or the other way around. I assume that this is what I am feeling, if I have my cruise set for 60, I can feel the truck and watch the tac and know when the transition is taking place. No matter if it goes from 4 to 8 or 8 to 4, my RPM's increase slightly, I mean slightly, makes the needle jump and there is a slight "jerk" I would call it. Do others have a slight increase in there RPM's, again it does not jump 500, I would say maybe 100 RPM's but enough to notice the needle jump. I know its not a transmission shift, because it can be on a flat road, and I can watch the indicator light switch. Didn't know if anyone else's truck acted this way?

I have noticed the same thing, or so I think. It's always out of the corner of my eye but I see the needle move slightly.

Edited by gmc1
Posted

So I was reading though the GM Techlink monthly newsletter I would call it, and I found this under the three new Silverado/Sierra engines and though it was interesting especially what the last sentence:

Active Fuel Management

 

Cylinder deactivation, also known as Active Fuel Management, is now standard on all three engines.The system uses oil pressure, controlled by the Powertrain Control Module, to deactivate the lifters on selected cylinders, closing the valves for those cylinders.It deactivates four of the cylinders on the V8 engines and two cylinders on the V6 under light load condi­tions — operating the engines as a V4 — and seamlessly reactivates the cylinders when the driver demands greater power.The transition takes less than 20 millisec­onds and is imperceptible

 

Mine is defiantly not imperceptible, but talking with the dealer he said that I will more than likely have to wait for GM to acknowledge this issue and come up with a fix. But I have not officially taken the truck in yet, so maybe once they drive it, maybe they can reflash it or something to help with the transition.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

^^^ same here, we have a 2012 5.3 work truck with 2000 miles and i never can feel the transition. On our 2014 it is very noticeable, almost feels like a shift.

Edited by brewguy101
Posted

^^^ same here, we have a 2012 5.3 work truck with 2000 miles and i never can feel the transition. On our 2014 it is very noticeable, almost feels like a shift.

My 2014 5.3 occasionally has a slight jerk going from V4 back to V8 mainly at low speeds I believe it only happens when the trans also downshifts at the same time but have not really checked that out just yet (now I am curious).. Does not bother me as it is identical to what my 2009 5.3 did (87k miles). I just thought it was NORMAL? I am not sure what their definition of seamless? I know that I can typically feel the 6 spd shifting gears I wonder if a 6spd transmission shift is supposed to be seamless? What was it Bill Clinton said it is according to what your definition of is IS LOL

Posted

I think I have it figured out now. GM has developed a updated version of the mood ring (some people on here may not be old enough to know what a mood ring is they can do a google search if needed) and your new 2014 truck senses your mood. If you are a crabby old fart today you get very little V4 , if you are kind to young children and pet the dog instead of kicking it the truck senses that and gives you lots of V4 and better gas mileage. Watch your MOOD swings bichs. LOL

  • Like 1
Posted

Most of the time I get a jerk but I have had everything from smooth as silk, to so hard I looked I the rear view mirror because I thought I just got rear ended. It seemed the worst in the fall when it started to get cold out, now that it's winter it doesn't go into v4 but every so often like going down hill. Gas milage went from 19 to low 13's too but part of that is just winter gas and cold.

Posted

losky79, on 03 Feb 2014 - 04:47 AM, said:snapback.png

On my 4.3 I feel a quick vibration throughout the entire truck when switching from V4 to V6 mode driving in the city, although I never feel it while on the highway or interstate. It only happens when I am driving between 30-40 mph at about 1000-1500 RPM.

 

Is there a way to just deactivate AFM completely?

I hope a V6 switches to the V3 mode, not V4 mode. Gm installed the AFM system on a 2007 V6 3.9 liter engine used in Impalas but after one year they removed the system. I wonder why.

I bet that ole 3.9 engine did go to V3 which would not run very well at all, that is probably why they burned it and probably why the new 4.3 V6 only drop 2 cylinders in AFM. These GM engineers are always learning very impressive.
Posted

http://www.rangetechnology.com/pages/v8

 

I installed the Range Technology V8 AFM disabler, yesterday and so far so good. I did not buy the 6.2 to worry about modest mpg gain while running only 4 cylinders. Since Range is still in beta test mode for the 6.2 plug-in I was able to get it for $179 or -$20 off msrp, and it shipped it arrived Sat. Takes all of 15 seconds to plug into the OBD port under the dash, and that's it...No more cyclinder de-activation. I've only driven like 40miles so far but it works seamlessly, and I have not gotten any engine warning light triggered. No more lugging down the highway in 4 cyclinder mode. Range said all ECU's are different, and the reason for the beta test is to make sure they have the widest range of potential ECU timing in order to release a product that will work with highest percentage of 6.2 engines. They estimated aprox 5% of the ECU's will never be able to work with their disabler (something about timing the electronic pulses), so it's nice to be the "other" 95% as my truck so far has been as advirtised. I am driving 6hrs each way on Wed for a 4 day family trip, so will let you know if anything changes. Fot those who never want their 6.2 V8 to be half the motor you paid for this Range Technology disabler seems like the perfect answer for $199.

  • Like 1
Posted

I installed one on my '14 5.3L. No more senseless downshifting to correct lose of speed after going into V4. MPG's seem to be the same if not better for me. In my area of NJ with tons of rolling hills, AFM is more of a nuisance then benefit. Great product.

 

 

 

Tapatalk via Moto X

 

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,343 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
    • Do you have access to BP fuels? Some stations have Silver 91 E-0 priced the same as their 93 E-10.  There is a local Marathon with 90 alky free for $6 a gallon but I go down the road to BP for $5-ish. They also have a 100 E-0 but that stuff is $10 a pop. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...