Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Check the truck's manual. It will contain a fuse diagram & key, indicating what system is connected to what fuse.

Already did that...no luck.

Posted

Controlled in the BCM - will need a tech to disable them, you can request it if it is not a requirement in your state from what I understand, just a check box in the software

Posted

Controlled in the BCM - will need a tech to disable them, you can request it if it is not a requirement in your state from what I understand, just a check box in the software

Thanks!! I'm gonna try it the next time I'm at the dealer. I'll post when/if I make any headway.

Posted

I don't live in Canada and don't believe my safety has anything to do with my initial question. Thanks for the info though.

LTZTom you must be assimilated, resistance is futile.

  • Like 3
Posted

I'll take paying for a bulb over getting smoked by someone that isn't paying attention any day. Lots of people are too clueless to turn on their headlights in low visibility conditions.. I personally think that all cars should have them.

Well one of the character flaws a lot of we Americans have, is that we don't like other people telling us what our vehicles should have. I guess we are just rebellious by nature. Drive safely my Canadian friend.

Posted

I don't live in Canada and don't believe my safety has anything to do with my initial question. Thanks for the info though.

What on earth does being to Canada have to do with it? I was first on scene to a head on collision. I guess some weird thing about seeing a few people die in front of me, and a stranger's brains, makes me extra cautious on the road. You wanna be a "rebel" and put your life in danger, go for it. Not surprised by the 'Merica! replies at all. Typical.

Posted

I was a firefighter for 30 years and I saw plenty of "people dying in front of me and stranger's brains". I can't think of ONE INSTANCE where daytime running lights would have made a difference!!

 

 

Tapatalk via iPhone 5s

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

I was a firefighter for 30 years and I saw plenty of "people dying in front of me and stranger's brains". I can't think of ONE INSTANCE where daytime running lights would have made a difference!! Tapatalk via iPhone 5s

 

Not to start an argument but you, a firefighter, and myself, a medic, arrive on the scene after the accident.. that means neither of us are qualified to comment on DRL's effectiveness.

 

In 30 years you never had a patient say "I didn't see them"??? In my experience, that was a weekly occurrence. The original reasoning behind DRL's was to make vehicles more noticeable to other drivers. It may/may not make not make a difference in most cases, no one knows... they don't have statistics on almost-accidents. IMO, if it prevents even one in every 1000 accidents, it's a good thing.

 

 

That said, I have no issues with any owners that disable them. They're not required by law so everyone should be free to choose if they want them or not.

.

Edited by MotoMedic
  • Like 2
Posted

I wasn't implying that I was "qualified to comment" on anything. I just want to disable those stupid DLRs. I didn't ask for comments on how evil I am for wanting to.

 

 

Tapatalk via iPhone 5s

Posted

The ignorant thing about wanting to turn of the DRL's on your own truck for whatever reason, is not for your own safety - because if you don't care, who am I too. But, it's for the safety of the people coming at you because chances are, their vehicle will have them so you'll have no problem seeing them.

Posted

...chances are, their vehicle will have them so you'll have no problem seeing them.

 

 

Not in the US. GM is alone in the domestic brands for having DRLs across their lineup. Various Asian brands have it on some models. German stuff generally does too.

Posted

Every head-on I've ever heard of was a case of somebody falling asleep at the wheel and crossing the center lane, or somebody so drunk they didn't know they were in the wrong lane. And they usually happen at night, when normal headlights were on. DRL's are obviously a non-issue for these.

 

I'd like to see some stats showing just how big a problem head-on crashes are in the daylight, with sober drivers who aren't doing something else stupid like street racing. If the odds of that happening are somewhere near those of winning the lottery, having DRL's save you from one would statistically be something like winning the lottery twice. I'm sure those numbers are published somewhere.

Posted

I was studying my New 2014 GMC Sierra and the LED's look so COOL in the daytime that there is no way I want them off but as stated it is a personal preference. If I wanted them off they are off by golly FBI Homeland Security IRS NSA Canadian Mounties Etc be darned

Posted

I wasn't implying that I was "qualified to comment" on anything. I just want to disable those stupid DLRs. I didn't ask for comments on how evil I am for wanting to. Tapatalk via iPhone 5s

 

"I was a firefighter for 30 years" sounds like a qualifying statement.. if not intended that way, my mistake. And I never said you were evil. I clearly stated "everyone should be free to choose if they want them or not."

 

Every head-on I've ever heard of was a case of somebody falling asleep at the wheel and crossing the center lane, or somebody so drunk they didn't know they were in the wrong lane. And they usually happen at night, when normal headlights were on. DRL's are obviously a non-issue for these.

 

I'd like to see some stats showing just how big a problem head-on crashes are in the daylight, with sober drivers who aren't doing something else stupid like street racing. If the odds of that happening are somewhere near those of winning the lottery, having DRL's save you from one would statistically be something like winning the lottery twice. I'm sure those numbers are published somewhere.

 

First, the general public only hears about significant accidents, involving fatalities or serious injuries. There are many, many more that most never know about. Just because you don't hear about something, doesn't mean it is or is not happening. As for day versus night stats, per the NHTSA, in 2011 there were 29,757 fatal crashes. 14,589 of them (49%) occurred during the day. 1181 of the (4%) occurred at dawn/dusk. 13,861 of them (46%) occurred at night. Also, of those 29,757 fatal crashes, only 9001 involved alcohol. (I've attached a nice little graph of La "crashes with injuries" by time of day to better illustrate the trend towards daylight accidents)

 

Second, I believe you're mistakenly assuming that DRL's are only intended to stop head-on collisions. There are many other types of accidents that involve the front of one vehicle striking another. One example is the T-bone-type. I worked hundreds of accidents where one driver at a 4-way or T-intersection pulls out in front of an oncoming vehicle. Often they misjudge the distance/speed of the other vehicle or don't see it at all. DRL's could help some driver's avoid these mistakes and prevent accidents.

 

Bottom Line - DRL's do increase a vehicle's overall visibility to other drivers.

But like I said before, it's impossible to keep stats on accidents prevented, so there's no way to know exactly how effective they are.

 

And again, I don't care if anyone uses them or disables them. I do however care about dis/misinformation on this forum.

post-34923-0-06855000-1391382733_thumb.png

post-34923-0-06855000-1391382733_thumb.png

post-34923-0-06855000-1391382733_thumb.png

post-34923-0-06855000-1391382733_thumb.png

  • Like 5

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,958
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    B07
    Newest Member
    B07
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 774 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
    • Looking for this part for my truck. They don't sell just that one piece and to get it you have to pay over $100 even used for the whole air tube. The piece the hose clamp snaps into that is held on by the screw and nut. If anyone has access to one please let me know.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...