Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Check the truck's manual. It will contain a fuse diagram & key, indicating what system is connected to what fuse.

Already did that...no luck.

Posted

Controlled in the BCM - will need a tech to disable them, you can request it if it is not a requirement in your state from what I understand, just a check box in the software

Posted

Controlled in the BCM - will need a tech to disable them, you can request it if it is not a requirement in your state from what I understand, just a check box in the software

Thanks!! I'm gonna try it the next time I'm at the dealer. I'll post when/if I make any headway.

Posted

I don't live in Canada and don't believe my safety has anything to do with my initial question. Thanks for the info though.

LTZTom you must be assimilated, resistance is futile.

  • Like 3
Posted

I'll take paying for a bulb over getting smoked by someone that isn't paying attention any day. Lots of people are too clueless to turn on their headlights in low visibility conditions.. I personally think that all cars should have them.

Well one of the character flaws a lot of we Americans have, is that we don't like other people telling us what our vehicles should have. I guess we are just rebellious by nature. Drive safely my Canadian friend.

Posted

I don't live in Canada and don't believe my safety has anything to do with my initial question. Thanks for the info though.

What on earth does being to Canada have to do with it? I was first on scene to a head on collision. I guess some weird thing about seeing a few people die in front of me, and a stranger's brains, makes me extra cautious on the road. You wanna be a "rebel" and put your life in danger, go for it. Not surprised by the 'Merica! replies at all. Typical.

Posted

I was a firefighter for 30 years and I saw plenty of "people dying in front of me and stranger's brains". I can't think of ONE INSTANCE where daytime running lights would have made a difference!!

 

 

Tapatalk via iPhone 5s

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

I was a firefighter for 30 years and I saw plenty of "people dying in front of me and stranger's brains". I can't think of ONE INSTANCE where daytime running lights would have made a difference!! Tapatalk via iPhone 5s

 

Not to start an argument but you, a firefighter, and myself, a medic, arrive on the scene after the accident.. that means neither of us are qualified to comment on DRL's effectiveness.

 

In 30 years you never had a patient say "I didn't see them"??? In my experience, that was a weekly occurrence. The original reasoning behind DRL's was to make vehicles more noticeable to other drivers. It may/may not make not make a difference in most cases, no one knows... they don't have statistics on almost-accidents. IMO, if it prevents even one in every 1000 accidents, it's a good thing.

 

 

That said, I have no issues with any owners that disable them. They're not required by law so everyone should be free to choose if they want them or not.

.

Edited by MotoMedic
  • Like 2
Posted

I wasn't implying that I was "qualified to comment" on anything. I just want to disable those stupid DLRs. I didn't ask for comments on how evil I am for wanting to.

 

 

Tapatalk via iPhone 5s

Posted

The ignorant thing about wanting to turn of the DRL's on your own truck for whatever reason, is not for your own safety - because if you don't care, who am I too. But, it's for the safety of the people coming at you because chances are, their vehicle will have them so you'll have no problem seeing them.

Posted

...chances are, their vehicle will have them so you'll have no problem seeing them.

 

 

Not in the US. GM is alone in the domestic brands for having DRLs across their lineup. Various Asian brands have it on some models. German stuff generally does too.

Posted

Every head-on I've ever heard of was a case of somebody falling asleep at the wheel and crossing the center lane, or somebody so drunk they didn't know they were in the wrong lane. And they usually happen at night, when normal headlights were on. DRL's are obviously a non-issue for these.

 

I'd like to see some stats showing just how big a problem head-on crashes are in the daylight, with sober drivers who aren't doing something else stupid like street racing. If the odds of that happening are somewhere near those of winning the lottery, having DRL's save you from one would statistically be something like winning the lottery twice. I'm sure those numbers are published somewhere.

Posted

I was studying my New 2014 GMC Sierra and the LED's look so COOL in the daytime that there is no way I want them off but as stated it is a personal preference. If I wanted them off they are off by golly FBI Homeland Security IRS NSA Canadian Mounties Etc be darned

Posted

I wasn't implying that I was "qualified to comment" on anything. I just want to disable those stupid DLRs. I didn't ask for comments on how evil I am for wanting to. Tapatalk via iPhone 5s

 

"I was a firefighter for 30 years" sounds like a qualifying statement.. if not intended that way, my mistake. And I never said you were evil. I clearly stated "everyone should be free to choose if they want them or not."

 

Every head-on I've ever heard of was a case of somebody falling asleep at the wheel and crossing the center lane, or somebody so drunk they didn't know they were in the wrong lane. And they usually happen at night, when normal headlights were on. DRL's are obviously a non-issue for these.

 

I'd like to see some stats showing just how big a problem head-on crashes are in the daylight, with sober drivers who aren't doing something else stupid like street racing. If the odds of that happening are somewhere near those of winning the lottery, having DRL's save you from one would statistically be something like winning the lottery twice. I'm sure those numbers are published somewhere.

 

First, the general public only hears about significant accidents, involving fatalities or serious injuries. There are many, many more that most never know about. Just because you don't hear about something, doesn't mean it is or is not happening. As for day versus night stats, per the NHTSA, in 2011 there were 29,757 fatal crashes. 14,589 of them (49%) occurred during the day. 1181 of the (4%) occurred at dawn/dusk. 13,861 of them (46%) occurred at night. Also, of those 29,757 fatal crashes, only 9001 involved alcohol. (I've attached a nice little graph of La "crashes with injuries" by time of day to better illustrate the trend towards daylight accidents)

 

Second, I believe you're mistakenly assuming that DRL's are only intended to stop head-on collisions. There are many other types of accidents that involve the front of one vehicle striking another. One example is the T-bone-type. I worked hundreds of accidents where one driver at a 4-way or T-intersection pulls out in front of an oncoming vehicle. Often they misjudge the distance/speed of the other vehicle or don't see it at all. DRL's could help some driver's avoid these mistakes and prevent accidents.

 

Bottom Line - DRL's do increase a vehicle's overall visibility to other drivers.

But like I said before, it's impossible to keep stats on accidents prevented, so there's no way to know exactly how effective they are.

 

And again, I don't care if anyone uses them or disables them. I do however care about dis/misinformation on this forum.

post-34923-0-06855000-1391382733_thumb.png

post-34923-0-06855000-1391382733_thumb.png

post-34923-0-06855000-1391382733_thumb.png

post-34923-0-06855000-1391382733_thumb.png

  • Like 5

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,978
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    rayredbone
    Newest Member
    rayredbone
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 504 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
    • Thank You.   So far my new ride is making me look like a genius for going with the 3.0L, as my first fuel refill occurred over three weeks from when I took delivery.  This engine combination is very amazing.  So far no issues and had not done a regen yet.
    • I am curious as to how much fluid you put back in the transmission ( assuming you had replaced the filter to compare to my findings ) and then went through the process of warming up the trans before pulling the check plug to drain out the excess and if you measured how much came back out.    I just found it surprising that some claimed a certain amount less fluid being put in and then draining some back out. The attitude of the truck as per if the surface is level and how the trucks stance is would make quite a difference since the check plug is right at the front of the transmission. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...