Jump to content

DENALI FRONT BUMPER PAINT PEELING OFF


Recommended Posts

Posted

Any one have this problem. I live in northern ontario canada. the dealer say that it is coming off from the sand and salt from the roads hitting the front of truck and they are probably right. But i have owned many vehicles and have never seen paint come off like this from road crap in such a short amount of time. it only took bout 15k of driving. i MIGHT expect this if i owned the vehicle for several yrs. Actually i have had some vehicle for a lot longer and have never seen front bumpers lose paint like that. You may have noticed that it is only the lower part of the bumper that is losing paint. The road debris must ONLY TARGET THAT AREA, right? BS!!! any thoughts?

post-125629-0-91790800-1398957903_thumb.jpg

post-125629-0-91790800-1398957903_thumb.jpg

post-125629-0-91790800-1398957903_thumb.jpg

post-125629-0-91790800-1398957903_thumb.jpg

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

My front bumper looks like that too but mine's an 06 and plenty more miles. I'd definitely would push to have that fixed up. That is really not cool on a brand new vehicle.

Posted

Any one have this problem. I live in northern ontario canada. the dealer say that it is coming off from the sand and salt from the roads hitting the front of truck and they are probably right. But i have owned many vehicles and have never seen paint come off like this from road crap in such a short amount of time. it only took bout 15k of driving. i MIGHT expect this if i owned the vehicle for several yrs. Actually i have had some vehicle for a lot longer and have never seen front bumpers lose paint like that. You may have noticed that it is only the lower part of the bumper that is losing paint. The road debris must ONLY TARGET THAT AREA, right? BS!!! any thoughts?

That portion of the bumper is going to be hit the most with flying debris. That's the corner of your truck that going to be taking the brunt of any loose sand and salt from every vehicle you've passed. I see a lot of newer trucks that are having this problem. They're all painted over metal bumpers. And it's not just the GM trucks. The FX4's have been have these problems for a couple years here. It's was the main reason I didn't buy a denali. I didn't want the painted bumpers.

 

If you get them to fix it, I'd suggest getting it 3M'd on the entire front of the truck. Otherwise, hate to say it, but it's probably going to happen again. The new water based paint that every manufacture uses now is not were near as strong as the old solvent based use to be.

 

Good luck

Posted

Well i wont be painting it. but I will get the front bumper wrapped in vinyl at a vehicle lettering place as it would be cheaper to do so. At least that is what i am thinking.

  • 3 months later...
Posted

I have the same problem. I cleaned it, touched it up and put the new 3M clear bra on it. No way should a new painted bumper look like mine does after 4000 miles.

 

Dealer says that it is standard road debris. I've never had a vehicle with paint that chips like this so early. I can only imagine what it would look like in a couple of years.

Posted

Yea my black All terrain bumper has a few chips in it. Not nearly as bad as OP, but still you'd think they would put a few extra coats of paint in the "high debris areas" to help prevent chipping and peeling. I am going to have mine repainted before winter and maybe add 3M Bra.

Posted

Chrome bumper holds up fine :)

 

Looking at the OP, I'd definitely put a coating or clear bra on any of the painted bumpers.

 

Truck13, hows it holding up?

Posted

Just got off phone with GM. they are doing absolutely nothing about it. They says it was road debris. I told them that i can fully agree that it was road debris. I then asked them why none of my others vehicles that travel on the same road don't have that problem. I have a school bus that is 7 hrs old. All the paint is still on that bumper. I just spent over 100 k on a truck for me and the wife. I guess they don't give a rats ass for that. I am in the market for a new bus, and if I have my way, it won't be a gm. My other company is also buying a few new vehicles in the next month or so. Probably won't be a gm. My only regret is that my dealer is very good to me and they may get caught in the scrap. Yes. I am mad!,,

Posted

I have a 2013 Chevrolet Sonic with painted plastic front end. The front bumper is the front fascia of the car. Not a single chip to date after 15k miles because they use flexible paint additive on soft plastic bumpers. And the paint quality on this car is most likely not better than on a 2014 truck.

Posted

Chrome bumper holds up fine :)

 

Looking at the OP, I'd definitely put a coating or clear bra on any of the painted bumpers.

 

Truck13, hows it holding up?

The clear bra looks great. I had the whole front including the chrome and mirrors done. Much easier to get bugs off too. Glad I did it, but I wish that I had done it day 1.

Posted

thats not a paint defect, thats from sand on the road and because you might be following people too close.

i had mine wrapped with clear bra. living in colorado we get sand on the roads all the time and i knew right away anything metal and painted is sure to take a beating.

plastic painted parts hold up much better.

best thing to do is remove the bumper and take it to a body shop, have them sand and repaint it, i bet it costs about 200 bucks in labor. you might even be able to save yourself some money doing the R&R and sanding yourself.

just have them spray it.

 

then let it cure for about a month and have it wrapped.

 

mine got 2 chips within the week of delivery before i could get it in for the clear bra.

i plan to full the chips with a syringe and a little touchup paint under the clear bra one of these days when i get around to it.

Posted

That portion of the bumper is going to be hit the most with flying debris. That's the corner of your truck that going to be taking the brunt of any loose sand and salt from every vehicle you've passed. I see a lot of newer trucks that are having this problem. They're all painted over metal bumpers. And it's not just the GM trucks. The FX4's have been have these problems for a couple years here. It's was the main reason I didn't buy a denali. I didn't want the painted bumpers.

 

If you get them to fix it, I'd suggest getting it 3M'd on the entire front of the truck. Otherwise, hate to say it, but it's probably going to happen again. The new water based paint that every manufacture uses now is not were near as strong as the old solvent based use to be.

 

Good luck

Its not the paint, Its the clearcoat. As someone that works in the auto paint industry, I can tell you its the most expensive thing that the manufacturer will try to save money on.

Posted

thats not a paint defect, thats from sand on the road and because you might be following people too close.

i had mine wrapped with clear bra. living in colorado we get sand on the roads all the time and i knew right away anything metal and painted is sure to take a beating.

plastic painted parts hold up much better.

best thing to do is remove the bumper and take it to a body shop, have them sand and repaint it, i bet it costs about 200 bucks in labor. you might even be able to save yourself some money doing the R&R and sanding yourself.

just have them spray it.

 

then let it cure for about a month and have it wrapped.

 

mine got 2 chips within the week of delivery before i could get it in for the clear bra.

i plan to full the chips with a syringe and a little touchup paint under the clear bra one of these days when i get around to it.

 

More along the lines of $100 just to take the bumper off and remove the sensors. Depending on if he wants to strip it, primer, sealer basecoat and clearcoat, that might turn into $450-500 job.

 

Since this is a problem on the new trucks I recommend people go that way and clear it with THIS clearcoat: http://www.armorcoatusa.com/ I did my truck in this, its the best and strongest clearcoat one can buy, never have chips again.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,667 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...