Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 6/29/2020 at 8:22 AM, Codman67 said:

That’s the size I’m lookin for looks good how’s the ride never had BFGoodrich before I have the 285/55/20 Hankooks that came with mine.

Ride is pretty good for an all-terrain type tire.  Rear end skips around occasionally when going though thru sharp mid-corner bumps.  Not sure if that's the tires or the suspension though.  

Posted
13 hours ago, NITTY said:

Close up

BF1F5E2A-7C81-476D-BDEB-3ADFBF9A3004.jpeg

Looks really good, how noisy are they at freeway speeds?

Posted
7 hours ago, JimCost2014 said:

Looks really good, how noisy are they at freeway speeds?

 

I’ve never had aggressive tires before so that’s hard for me to answer.  They definitely have a howl to them but it’s just my weekend ride so it doesn’t bother me.

Posted
6 hours ago, NITTY said:

I’ve never had aggressive tires before so that’s hard for me to answer.  They definitely have a howl to them but it’s just my weekend ride so it doesn’t bother me.

Got it, thanks for the reply. It will help me with my decision on new tires.

 

 

Posted
On 7/20/2020 at 11:48 AM, bugzz2010 said:

2016 Silverado 1500 4x4  2" Level, Air Bags in rear and Monroe Load Lifters

285/65/18 Nitto Terra Grapplers on 18" Tahoe Stocks

2016 Silverado.jpg

Good looking truck, where did you get the 4X4 badges from? They are pretty cool looking. 

Posted (edited)

GM Replica wheels 22x9 with Nitto Ridge Grapplers 305-45-22.  ReadyLift 2.25" front level, replaced rear 1" block with 2.25".  No rubbing.

silverado1.jpg

20200624_113019.jpg

Edited by Luster
  • Like 4
Posted

2.5 motofab up front. Back lifted 3/4 in. Factory 22s with Factory size tires for now. Will have 33s next year hopefully.

20200802_194501.jpg

  • Like 3
Posted
GM Replica wheels 22x9 with Nitto Ridge Grapplers 305-45-22.  ReadyLift 2.25" front level, replaced rear 1" block with 2.25".  No rubbing.
silverado1.thumb.jpg.7b3538daf25cdecb9ad433320cbfef9e.jpg
20200624_113019.thumb.jpg.08c0361d3ce738086743f7b967a5665f.jpg
Looks great man! Hey, where you been?
Posted
2.5 motofab up front. Back lifted 3/4 in. Factory 22s with Factory size tires for now. Will have 33s next year hopefully.
20200802_194501.thumb.jpg.78e6561a425ba3b5dda41ae037267bc9.jpg
That color is popping!!! Love this truck but I miss the sanoma red on my '14!
Posted

I love the color I try to clean this truck whenever I can. Its amazing gleaming in the sun.

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
I only trimmed the fender liners! I took out quite a bit but now they fit no rubbing with normal driving on the street and in parking lots. Even in reverse full lock, no rub.  
I don't do much off roading but they would rub most likely.
 
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
 
 
 
Been a little while since you posted this. How you like the set up? No major rubbing?

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

Posted
On 8/28/2020 at 6:26 PM, Z-7-1 said:

Been a little while since you posted this. How you like the set up? No major rubbing?

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
 

Yea Im loving it man. Only time it rubs is when I back out of the driveway and its at like halfway turned. Its rubbing on the plastic cap on the cab corner. Its very minor and I dont intend on doing anymore trimming. If i turn it full lock it moves past and doesnt rub.

  • Like 1
Posted

[mention=210948]IronVilkas[/mention] I'm running 275/65/20 right now and love the extra height, but the Nitto G2s are almost done after 70k miles and I want to go with something wider while keeping the height. The setup you did looks great and is probably the tallest tire you can fit with a level.

 

I need to change wheels anyway, these came with the truck, 20x8.5 +35, they keep the tire tucked pretty far with the offset.d124cdd4effedcde865209c6575c75b7.jpge0d7d0a709f769317529c38238689c29.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

 

 

 

e6cf24cd12b99cae7c193f05a925489e.jpg

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 2,836 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...