Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My tire size is 285/70/17. I did not recalibrate yet. I know the mpc difference and take that into account but my normal driving has dropped and I'm not pushing it

Mine dropped too. I have 275/70/18 so they're about the same height. Its the weight of the 10 ply tires mostly. Gearing is a little different, but in stop and go, the weight is the biggest thing. Mine dropped as well.

Only way to truly fix it is to go back to stock tires... NOT WORTH IT (in my opinion)

But you could get a custom tune from DiabLew, those seem to help a little bit.

Just dont let the dealership know you did it.

Posted

'16 Tungsten. 305/40/22 114v load rating on 22x9.5 Platinum Divine wheels. +25 offset.

 

9KSSj1w.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

(Sorry in advance if this happens to be a dumb question)

 

Why do people seem to fret slightly when going from a 45lb tire to, say, a 60lb tire? I understand that it would take more to turn the wheel because of the added weight, but in the grand scheme of things, that's only an extra 60 lbs of weight added as a total (15lbsx4wheels).

 

But that 60 lbs of added weight is next to nothing, considering when you are driving alone you alone are adding 130-200lbs to the truck by your own weight.... then if you have at least one passenger (wife/significant other/friend), there's another 100-150 usually added to that. So why do people fret about adding 60lbs of unsprung weight to their truck when they already add 200-300lbs by getting in the vehicle?

 

Again, I apologize if it sounds dumb, that just happened to run through my mind the other night. If somebody could set me straight, that'd be fantastic.

  • Like 1
Posted

Doesn't every pound of un-sprung weight equate to something like 10 pounds of sprung weight?...so if that's true 60lbs would be a noticeable difference. I'm probably wrong with the conversion but don't thing it's 1 for 1.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

(Sorry in advance if this happens to be a dumb question)

 

Why do people seem to fret slightly when going from a 45lb tire to, say, a 60lb tire? I understand that it would take more to turn the wheel because of the added weight, but in the grand scheme of things, that's only an extra 60 lbs of weight added as a total (15lbsx4wheels).

 

But that 60 lbs of added weight is next to nothing, considering when you are driving alone you alone are adding 130-200lbs to the truck by your own weight.... then if you have at least one passenger (wife/significant other/friend), there's another 100-150 usually added to that. So why do people fret about adding 60lbs of unsprung weight to their truck when they already add 200-300lbs by getting in the vehicle?

 

Again, I apologize if it sounds dumb, that just happened to run through my mind the other night. If somebody could set me straight, that'd be fantastic.

The rotating weight of the tires is not equal to adding weight into the pickup.

If you drive around on stock tires, then put another set on that adds 15lbs per tire, it is a VERY noticeable difference in acceleration because the truck is having to turn that much more weight.

If you were to just add 60 lbs into the truck, you wouldn't even notice. Even adding a few people into the vehicle isnt as easily noticeable in regards to performance and acceleration.

 

I race mountain bikes and in bike racing, you notice a VERY large change in the handling characteristics, acceleration and overall performance of the bike as soon as you drop weight in your wheels/tires/drivetrain (any rotating mass on the bike) because of the energy it takes to rotate that weight.

So in competitive racing you see people spending more money upgrading wheels than you do on most of the other components, because its the smarter place to put your money.

Edited by tyrich88
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Im running 305/65r 18 Nitto Terra Grapplers (33.58 x 12.30) on 18x9 Procomp series 32 wheels, 0 offset

3.5 RC lift and 1.5 zone BL and no rubbing what so ever

 

 

post-166006-0-35846200-1484858362_thumb.png

post-166006-0-30054100-1484858548_thumb.jpg

post-166006-0-35846200-1484858362_thumb.png

post-166006-0-30054100-1484858548_thumb.jpg

post-166006-0-35846200-1484858362_thumb.png

post-166006-0-30054100-1484858548_thumb.jpg

post-166006-0-35846200-1484858362_thumb.png

post-166006-0-30054100-1484858548_thumb.jpg

Edited by shoaf3152
  • Like 1
Posted

Im running 305/65r 18 Nitto Terra Grapplers (33.58 x 12.30) on 18x9 Procomp series 32 wheels, 0 offset

3.5 RC lift and 1.5 zone BL and no rubbing what so ever

 

 

I thought about trying to squeeze those onto my truck for my next set... not sure if they will fit with just a 2" level and stock wheels (maybe +18 offset wheels if I find a good deal on the ones i want)

Posted

The rotating weight of the tires is not equal to adding weight into the pickup.

If you drive around on stock tires, then put another set on that adds 15lbs per tire, it is a VERY noticeable difference in acceleration because the truck is having to turn that much more weight.

If you were to just add 60 lbs into the truck, you wouldn't even notice. Even adding a few people into the vehicle isnt as easily noticeable in regards to performance and acceleration.

 

I race mountain bikes and in bike racing, you notice a VERY large change in the handling characteristics, acceleration and overall performance of the bike as soon as you drop weight in your wheels/tires/drivetrain (any rotating mass on the bike) because of the energy it takes to rotate that weight.

So in competitive racing you see people spending more money upgrading wheels than you do on most of the other components, because its the smarter place to put your money.

 

Thanks for the info, my thought process was spinning the tires with the weight "over" the tires would be similar to having the weight "in" the tires.

 

That makes sense, I appreciate you explaining that to me.

 

So in essence, would that result in excessively accelerated wear/tear on powertrain components? Drive shaft and axles used to turn the wheels? I would think not, since there are a ton of people that add that kind of weight change, sometimes more than that, to their trucks, but perhaps they just don't care because they don't keep it long enough to matter? If you have info on this as well, that'd be fantastic.

Posted

 

Thanks for the info, my thought process was spinning the tires with the weight "over" the tires would be similar to having the weight "in" the tires.

 

That makes sense, I appreciate you explaining that to me.

 

So in essence, would that result in excessively accelerated wear/tear on powertrain components? Drive shaft and axles used to turn the wheels? I would think not, since there are a ton of people that add that kind of weight change, sometimes more than that, to their trucks, but perhaps they just don't care because they don't keep it long enough to matter? If you have info on this as well, that'd be fantastic.

It would make sense that it does put more wear on, because it takes more effort to get the wheels moving. But... its clearly not enough to matter. I've been running 10 ply tires for a long time and never had an issue. I know a lot of others on here run 10 ply tires as well and those heavier/wider tires weigh significantly more, so if it were to actually cause a problem that fast, you would hear about it.

Posted

It would make sense that it does put more wear on, because it takes more effort to get the wheels moving. But... its clearly not enough to matter. I've been running 10 ply tires for a long time and never had an issue. I know a lot of others on here run 10 ply tires as well and those heavier/wider tires weigh significantly more, so if it were to actually cause a problem that fast, you would hear about it.

 

Thanks for the information!

  • Like 1
Posted

No rubbing at all

Do you think the 2" leveling is necessary, or could one get by with less or no leveling?

Posted

20" Chrome OEM Replicas 20X9 on 275/60R20 Nitto Terra Grappler G2. No level, no rub. 4a5ea113454eda33248d2fa3c67a3494.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Posted

Man those things aren't doing any good sitting there...Send them this way!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • On the subject of OLM, Gm's OLM tool may be more "informed" than others brands. I recall OLM's in mid-2000's Chrysler products literally counting down a set number of miles. That's all the OLM appeared to be.    I would actually expect GM to be able to explain the parameters that their OLM takes into account from a high level. No, I would not expect them to disclose their software coding or data analysis around their parameters.   So we're talking about two different topics, so to continue the subject on the other one, I'd be curious to know how much "standard particulate matter" in fresh oil is able to be filtered at first start by a fresh oil filter. How much particulate matter is enough to "matter"?   I.e. how much of a "lever" do we think this equates to (variability in particulate content, in fresh oils, between different makes/brands, some which filter less, and some that filter more).   We can say that more particles = more wear = shorter engine life as a logical statement and use that data with a little marketing to scare people into selecting a more refined/filtered oil. Using a similie, is this like deciding to forego two alcoholic drinks in a lifetime because we're worried about the potential impact on lifespan? Are there numbers which translate the ISO test results into a quantifiable increase in wear for a given engine/use case?
    • I'm pretty sure it doesn't actually recalibrate the speedometer it just changes the wheel speed sensor inputs to the computer. The truck still thinks it has stock tires.
    • I apologize, I missed this post, at risk of going off CURRENT TOPIC.   I'm not saying it is BS, I'm questioning how much information is being held back. GM is NOT going to spell out exactly every parameter in the algorithm. Liability, intellectual property, etc.    I'm not naive enough to believe that it is as simple as revolutions, coolant temperature, miles, time; are you?    I don't do irrational either, and boiling the OLM down to four simple values that I could code in an afternoon (I'm not a coder) is irrational - unless it suits your agenda to ignore it. 
    • Chris 21 I appreciate your constructive response. !!  😉😉😉   The 6.6 is gas.  Correct me if I’m wrong but by recalibrating the speedo you’re correcting the shift points of the transmission on these trucks.?.
    • That is a huge misconception.     Bigger does not always equal safer.  Modifying does not make it safer either, with exceptions.   Think of this.  Your truck in stock form is capable of emergency maneuvers, proper stopping distances, its handling is designed around the factory wheel/tire packages, etc.   37s and a lift?  Now you've affected your braking distances, handling and ride control.  You've raised your center of gravity higher.  Your front visibility is now obstructed more than stock, same for your rear.  Does it look cooler?  Yes.  Does it now work as good as it did from factory on road?  NO.       As for my mention of exceptions?  Say you had a sedan or crossover.  They typically come with all season tires.  If you swap out for a performance all season or a summer tire, you improve your car by lowering its stopping distance (better braking because of traction) and improve the handling (regular and emergency) of the vehicle.  That is an actually improving modification.  My old 2019 LD 1500, I ran UHP all season tires on 20in wheels in a factory offered size.  It improved all aspects of how it drove over the Duratracs it came with from the factory in the stock 18" tire.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...