Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Same here. Label off, Boot up.
I drove around a while with them Boot down and no difference in ride or handling.
Boot up looks better and makes more sense.



My 2500 DMAX CC Bilsteins boots up
02c8546e81b4079844cd7b398bcd753c.png

My 1500 6.2 CC boots down
3f03705b12beaa51ad929822a55097a9.png



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Sooperdave said:

I don't think it really matters but I installed mine just like factory... boot on top.  I actually removed the label and flipped it so it reads correctly.  

 

5 hours ago, Sierra Dan said:

Same here. Label off, Boot up.

I drove around a while with them Boot down and no difference in ride or handling.

Boot up looks better and makes more sense.

 

46 minutes ago, TXGREEK said:

 

 


My 2500 DMAX CC Bilsteins boots up
02c8546e81b4079844cd7b398bcd753c.png

My 1500 6.2 CC boots down
3f03705b12beaa51ad929822a55097a9.png



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

I did a little more research asking around to different mechanics.  Generally, the consensus is that the Bilstein logo should go up and that's how you know the orientation of the shocks.  From a performance standpoint, it doesn't seem to matter which direction the shocks are orientated...they should still perform the same.  The reason the boot goes down on the 5100's is because it keeps dirt and debris from settling around the joint/seam where the piston enters the main shock body.  Also the boot is more resilient against rocks/debris/etc. so in theory the shock should last longer since the main metal housing around the critical part of the shock isn't getting damaged.  My Ranchos were all rusted and the paint was missing at the bottom so this theory makes sense given what I experienced with the Rancho's.  In other words it's more of an "off road" orientation to have the boot down.  But performance-wise, it really shouldn't matter...the dampening effects are the same.

Edited by Silverado-Hareek
Posted
I did a little more research asking around to different mechanics.  Generally, the consensus is that the Bilstein logo should go up and that's how you know the orientation of the shocks.  From a performance standpoint, it doesn't seem to matter which direction the shocks are orientated...they should still perform the same.  The reason the boot goes down on the 5100's is because it keeps dirt and debris from settling around the joint/seam where the piston enters the main shock body.  Also the boot is more resilient against rocks/debris/etc. so in theory the shock should last longer since the main metal housing around the critical part of the shock isn't getting damaged.  My Ranchos were all rusted and the paint was missing at the bottom so this theory makes sense given what I experienced with the Rancho's.  In other words it's more of an "off road" orientation to have the boot down.  But performance-wise, it really shouldn't matter...the dampening effects are the same.


After speaking with GM of 4wheelparts, the geometry of the shock requires install to be right side up for the Bilstein label. I had install as per instructions from Bilstein and drive great!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
1 hour ago, TXGREEK said:

 


After speaking with GM of 4wheelparts, the geometry of the shock requires install to be right side up for the Bilstein label. I had install as per instructions from Bilstein and drive great!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

The front shocks only install in one direction obviously.  And at least on mine, their labels were right side up.  

 

The rear shocks though physically can be installed in either direction because of how the truck is designed to receive the rear shocks and how the rear shocks are designed....the mounting components (I don't know the technical term of the part that the bolt passes through at the end of the shock) of the shock are oriented in the same direction which allows you to flip the shock either way.  Whether you should install them in either direction is another matter and that's where people seem to get confused and ask the question.  Unfortunately there's conflicting information out there but generally, the most consistent answer I've seen is that the label should be facing up.  Bilstein isn't the only shock on the market either that has a boot-down design for some of their shocks so it is something that's done often.

Posted (edited)

As promised, here's a before and after of the finished product:

 

truck%20level%20and%20tires_zpsmjvjp5ix.

 

Ignore the crappy "photoshopping" around the truck.  I was trying to hide/cut out other vehicles and items to protect others' privacy.  As  for the truck, I have the 5100's set to the 2nd highest setting (1 down from the highest setting).  The tires are 275/70/R18's.  I was worried about how the load range E tires would feel on the road, but the truck drives great.  And I can't explain why or how, but my steering loosened back up after these tires went on and the popping noise when steering issue went away.  The only explanation I have is that the noise and tightness had something to do with the angle of the tierods and the new tires adjusted that angle just enough to make a difference.  In theory I wouldn't think the tires could have an effect on the angle given this set up, but I don't know how else to explain it.  Overall though I'm thrilled with how the truck looks now and how it drives.

Edited by Silverado-Hareek
  • Like 3
Posted
On 7/13/2018 at 9:56 AM, JamesAT18 said:

Just to confirm, for 2017+ there doesn't need UCA replacement to install Bilstiens. Correct? 

 

Correct, the 5100's are designed to work with all of your other stock components.

  • Like 1
Posted
The front shocks only install in one direction obviously.  And at least on mine, their labels were right side up.  
 
The rear shocks though physically can be installed in either direction because of how the truck is designed to receive the rear shocks and how the rear shocks are designed....the mounting components (I don't know the technical term of the part that the bolt passes through at the end of the shock) of the shock are oriented in the same direction which allows you to flip the shock either way.  Whether you should install them in either direction is another matter and that's where people seem to get confused and ask the question.  Unfortunately there's conflicting information out there but generally, the most consistent answer I've seen is that the label should be facing up.  Bilstein isn't the only shock on the market either that has a boot-down design for some of their shocks so it is something that's done often.


My brothers Fox 2.0 shocks don’t have boots just bare chrome piston shaft aiming downward (just like the Bilsteins) which is weird considering it’s an off-road shock with nothing to protect it from debris.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

I made my own conclusion. I flipped the label and ran in the orientation as the OE shocks.  If you look at most OE shock/strut bodies, the boots are typically on top.  With this particular boot and type of shock it really shouldn't matter.  This boot is sealed at both ends to protect from elements.  I think it looks better with it up as well.  

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Sooperdave said:

I made my own conclusion. I flipped the label and ran in the orientation as the OE shocks.  If you look at most OE shock/strut bodies, the boots are typically on top.  With this particular boot and type of shock it really shouldn't matter.  This boot is sealed at both ends to protect from elements.  I think it looks better with it up as well.  

Yeah I don’t think it really matters from a performance standpoint in my opinion. It’s a cosmetic choice. But the boot isn’t perfectly sealed. If you look it has drainage holes so it can breathe and drain. Just an FYI. 

Edited by Silverado-Hareek
Posted

Been running my Bilstein 5100's for over a year now and I have been very happy with them. Recently up graded to LT275 60R20 Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 tires. Little over an inch rake, but I think the stance is prefect. 

IMG_20180722_133146.jpg

IMG_20180722_133226.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
On 7/20/2018 at 10:34 PM, Silverado-Hareek said:

As promised, here's a before and after of the finished product:

 

truck%20level%20and%20tires_zpsmjvjp5ix.

 

Ignore the crappy "photoshopping" around the truck.  I was trying to hide/cut out other vehicles and items to protect others' privacy.  As  for the truck, I have the 5100's set to the 2nd highest setting (1 down from the highest setting).  The tires are 275/70/R18's.  I was worried about how the load range E tires would feel on the road, but the truck drives great.  And I can't explain why or how, but my steering loosened back up after these tires went on and the popping noise when steering issue went away.  The only explanation I have is that the noise and tightness had something to do with the angle of the tierods and the new tires adjusted that angle just enough to make a difference.  In theory I wouldn't think the tires could have an effect on the angle given this set up, but I don't know how else to explain it.  Overall though I'm thrilled with how the truck looks now and how it drives.

Looks great! I plan the same thing for mine. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, 8086BRUCE said:

Looks great! I plan the same thing for mine. 

Thanks man.  Nice you will love it!  It's hard to tell in the 2nd photo but I was trying to maintain some of the forward rake because I still plan to haul and tow some with this truck.  But after the level and tires I raised the front almost 3 inches (tires plus leveling shocks) and the rear about 1 inch (from the tires only).

Posted
1 minute ago, Silverado-Hareek said:

Thanks man.  Nice you will love it!  It's hard to tell in the 2nd photo but I was trying to maintain some of the forward rake because I still plan to haul and tow some with this truck.  But after the level and tires I raised the front almost 3 inches (tires plus leveling shocks) and the rear about 1 inch (from the tires only).

That's exactly what I'm looking for. I still need rake for hauling the boat ect.

Posted
23 minutes ago, 8086BRUCE said:

That's exactly what I'm looking for. I still need rake for hauling the boat ect.

I think I have about 1” of fall from rear to front now.  Before the level it was about 3 inches

Posted
38 minutes ago, Silverado-Hareek said:

I think I have about 1” of fall from rear to front now.  Before the level it was about 3 inches

Thanks much for the info. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,973
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Gilkey96
    Newest Member
    Gilkey96
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 790 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Replace the fuel pump with an OEM AC-Delco.
    • Hello, first time posting here. I have an 03 Chevy 1500HD with the 6 liter gas engine. The truck ran fine until the fuel pump died on me and had to get it towed. Replaced the fuel pump with a precision pump from O’rileys and changed the fuel filter while I was there. The truck will run and drive now but it wants to idle around 500 rpm when in drive and it tries to stall if you touch the gas. It drives fine though, just doesn’t want to idle. Put a fuel pressure gauge on the rail and only have 50 psi. I guess these trucks should have 55-62 psi to run right. I thought the regulator might be the issue because when I would unplug the vacuum hose it jumped to 56 psi. Replaced the regulator and no change. The only thing I can think of is that I was sold a faulty fuel pump. Any help would be appreciated because I’d rather not have to take the bed off again if I don’t have too. Thank you!
    • I've been wrenching on GM trucks for 17 years. And I need to get something off my chest because it's been weighing on me for a long time. After all that time, all those motors, all those people standing in my bay, I've figured out there are really only two kinds of owners. The ones who already know about this. And the ones who are about to find out the hard way. A guy came into my shop a few weeks back in a 2018 Silverado 5.3. Sharp guy, maybe 35. Knew his truck cold. He'd been on the forums, read the threads, done his homework. He only rolled in so I could double-check a little module he'd already plugged in himself. Wanted a second set of eyes on it. Ten minutes, in and out, drove off happy. Two days later, a completely different story walked through the same door. Older fella this time, in a 2016 Sierra. Gorgeous truck, clearly babied, not a scratch on it. Wedding ring. Looked like a guy who took care of his stuff. He was in because his engine had started knocking on the way to work. And by the time I got the valve cover off, I already knew it was too late. Lifter collapsed. Cylinder 5. Camshaft chewed up. The whole top end shot. Same kind of truck. Same motor. Same roads, probably the same dealer. The only thing separating those two men was information. I've been at this since 2008, and I've worked on everything GM puts out. Silverados. Sierras. Tahoes. Yukons. Suburbans. Escalades. The 5.3 and the 6.2. Doesn't matter which badge is on the tailgate. They all carry the same problem. So here's the information one of those guys had and the other one didn't. It's called Active Fuel Management. AFM. GM started building it into their V6s and V8s back in 2007 to squeeze out a little better mileage on the highway. Maybe a mile or two a gallon. All to hit government fuel economy numbers. The way it works, the motor quietly shuts down half its cylinders when you're just cruising along. And the little lifters that pull that off have a tiny pin inside them that's constantly clicking in and out. Lock, unlock, lock, unlock. Hundreds of times a drive. Thousands of times a week. Eventually one of those pins wears through. The lifter drops. And it starts grinding the camshaft down like a chisel on butter. And what nobody tells you is that the shudder you feel around 40 or 50 mph? That's the system cycling. Every single time. Here's what really gets me. The pre-2007 trucks, the ones without AFM, they're bulletproof. I've got customers still daily driving them with 260,000 miles on the odometer. Not a problem in the world. GM took a perfectly good motor that would have lasted a lifetime and bolted this system onto it. And it is wrecking engines that should have run forever. The guys who hang around the forums already know all of this. So do the techs. They handled this years ago. They didn't sit around waiting for the dealership to mail them a warning letter, because that letter is never coming. It's the guys who figured somebody would've told them who end up on my lift. And I want to be clear, because this part matters. Maintenance has nothing to do with it. I've torn down motors with barely 30,000 miles on the clock. I pulled apart a Tahoe last summer with 24,000 on it. Practically a brand new truck. Owner had it less than a year. Spotless oil. Best synthetic money can buy, changed early every time. Made no difference. I've seen guys with full dealer records, every interval stamped. Made no difference. The oil changes were never the problem. The pin was. And no amount of babying that truck stops that pin from cycling every single time you drive. That's the part that eats at me. These are good motors. Take the AFM out of the equation and a 5.3 or a 6.2 will run 300,000 miles and never blink. So a few years ago I started telling every single owner who comes through my doors the exact same thing the smart guys already knew. Get yourself a FullForce disabler. It plugs right into the port under your dash. Couple of seconds and you're done. It just tells the computer to leave every cylinder running, full time. No more cycling. No more beating those lifters back and forth every time you turn the key. It doesn't reprogram anything. Doesn't touch your tune. And unplug it before a dealer visit and there's absolutely zero trace it was ever installed. I've had customers come back at 40,000, 60,000, 80,000 miles after I put one in. Zero issues. The trucks run smoother. And the lifters aren't getting beaten to death every single drive. I won't sit here and tell you it's magic. A lifter that's already damaged is a lifter that's already damaged, and this won't un-ring that bell. But it takes away the one thing causing all that wear in the first place. That's the whole game. You don't need a five-thousand-dollar delete. You don't need an expensive tune. You don't need to tear anything apart. You just need to stop the cycling. I'm not writing this for any company. I'm writing it because I'm tired of watching the guys who didn't know pay four and five figures for it. I'm tired of being the guy who has to break the news. I'm tired of knowing that the guys who did know fixed the whole thing for the price of a tank of gas, and the only difference was that somebody told them first. If you drive a Silverado, Sierra, Tahoe, Yukon, Suburban, or Escalade from 2007 or newer with a V6 or V8, you've got AFM. You've got those lifters, and they're cycling every single time you drive. So be the guy who already knew. Not the one I'm scraping metal out of next month. EDIT: A bunch of folks asked, so here it is. The one I put my faith in is FullForce. This is where to find it: https://www.tryfullforce.com/products/fullforce™-afm-dfm-disabler They back it with a 60-day guarantee too. I've handed out more than I can count and not one's ever come back to me. Not one. See less
    • Thanks for following along. I'm not author material, my tenses are all over the place and an editor would have a heck of a time cleaning up after me. Reading and writing is still a fun pastime though.   My new scanner came in yesterday, wow, where the heck has this thing been?! It connects right up to the Blazer, there's all kinds of bidirectional tests like EGR activation and percentage, toggle the fuel pump relay, EVAP purge valve, IAC control, AC relay, reset the transmission's adaptive learning, toggle shift solenoids and TCC lockup, and I can reset fuel trims with the click of a button...all things I could have used over the last 60 days!   It's also telling me there is a stored code in the ABS module for front left wheel sensor open and something about the brake switch. The ABS dash light works. It illuminates normally during the self-test at key on/ start and that's it. I cleared the codes and will see if they set when I take it out later. That, and I'm going to get (hopefully) real data on timing and cam ******. The PID's are there.   I connected the tool to my truck...holy smokes. Newer vehicles make early OBDII vehicles look like 8-bit, pixelated, early Nintendo stuff. This? This is like wearing 3D virtual reality goggles playing one of those elaborate, cinematic video games with seasons and plots in comparison. There are SO MANY modules and SO MANY tests and SO MUCH data. There's a scanner sequence for filling the coolant...   End of the day, it's a tool with way more power than I need, but the versatility to do old and new is there (and I need an adapter to connect it to my OBDI Camaro). It will allow me to do the first pass of diagnosis when out-of-warranty vehicles need help, and it will enable more DIY maintenance like brake system bleeding, ABS bleed, etc. I probably over-bought here, but, mission is accomplished.   Enjoy your Sunday...I need to shut this machine down and go get ready for the week ahead.
    • Not that I've read, after all the issues they've had in the past I'm pretty sure they learned their lesson. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...