Jump to content

Bilstein shocks thread

yanzhixiang

By yanzhixiang
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

jimbrown1 Enthusiast

jimbrown1

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, Epsilon Plus said:

Do the 5100s have a "0" setting? I'm still trying to wrap my head around if they are for trucks WITH a level or can level themselves, or do both in combination.

 

I have a BDS 2" level that I am happy with. Truck sits perfect and drives fine. I have no interest at all in any extra added height, but I'm looking for some good shocks to tow with. The 4600s sound fine to me but they are for stock height apparently. That's fine for the rear, but again, I'm 2" higher up front. Does this imply that the 4600s would be too short and top out a ton with a 2" up front? Will the 5100s work in front for me without adding any more lift?

 

Since I'm here, how do the shocks lift anyway? Valve the fluid up and put all the pressure on an internal spacer/solenoid that provides the lift? I suppose I could delete the BDS and just do 5100 but I'd imagine the shocks would last longer if they weren't artificially trying to support the weight of the front end up. Maybe I have it all wrong?

 

Not looking to do any off-road. Just bought a max GVWR 7,000# travel trailer and looking for ideas to help keep it planted where it should be.

 

Thanks for any tips/info.

I have the 5100 shocks with a Rugged Off Road 2" spacer under the front strut.  I couldn't stand the Ranchos and didn't want to use the strut as the lift.  I'm happy with the setup and the ride is great. 

  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

bwilloby46
bwilloby46

I put the bilstein 5100s on the rear of my 14 High Country with a new 2" block a few weeks ago. Ride is unbelievable compared to stock. Liked it so much I got the adjustable 5100s for my front, remove

schloppy
schloppy

Hello, I'm not new to the forum but I just joined and figured I'd contribute to the community.   2016 Silverado 1500 "Z71" removed rancho's and swapped with Bilstein 5100's all around. So after d

Jullian is not my name
Jullian is not my name

I just got done with installing my 6112's on my 2014 GMC Sierra Crew Cab.  Reading some install guides on here really helped, along with printing some Chilton Repair guide torque specs that I got from

Posted Images

ThundahBeagle Enthusiast

ThundahBeagle

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, jimbrown1 said:

I have the 5100 shocks with a Rugged Off Road 2" spacer under the front strut.  I couldn't stand the Ranchos and didn't want to use the strut as the lift.  I'm happy with the setup and the ride is great. 

To @Epsilon Plus

 

Coil-overs work by placing the shock inside the coil spring, but that coil spring has to have an attachment or "perch" location on the shock itself. The Bilstein 5100's have 4 settings. The lowest setting is "stock" height. Top setting is about 1.8 inches above stock.

 

If you have a lift that uses shims above or below your coilover unit, and you are using stock shocks, then you can simply change out your shocks with the 4600's or the 5100's set at the lowest perch setting. Most people get the 5100's INSTEAD of using shims, because the spring perch can be set higher. The shock fluid is not the cause of the lift, the fact that the coil spring sits higher on the shock is what is doing the work. Like choking up on a baseball bat. So for example, you could get rid of the BDS hardware at the front of your truck and just use the Bilstein 5100's at the top setting. Supposedly you will get a better ride quality as well.

 

I have the Bilstein 5100's on my truck and they ride great. Way better than the Ranchos that I took out of there.

 

I hope that helps

ThundahBeagle Enthusiast

ThundahBeagle

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Love your dog! 

Thanks, Grump! Me too. One of the best dogs I've ever had. He's all "go, go, go!" and wants to be outside in the woods and mountains all the time "on the hunt."

  • Like 1
Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, ThundahBeagle said:

Thanks, Grump! Me too. One of the best dogs I've ever had. He's all "go, go, go!" and wants to be outside in the woods and mountains all the time "on the hunt."

I love Beagles but he wife doesn't like their bay. We have this 17"  33# Rat (Rex). Rare to hear him.

He is a perfect truck dog. Travels really well and nobody is getting in the truck he doesn't know. 

Young man found that out trying to take my phone. Ops! Tinted glass LOL 

 

IMG_2273.JPG.1860a9f1768fdecd4803e0f55d91c76a.JPG

ThundahBeagle Enthusiast

ThundahBeagle

Posted
Posted
48 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

I love Beagles but he wife doesn't like their bay. We have this 17"  33# Rat (Rex). Rare to hear him.

He is a perfect truck dog. Travels really well and nobody is getting in the truck he doesn't know. 

Young man found that out trying to take my phone. Ops! Tinted glass LOL 

 

IMG_2273.JPG.1860a9f1768fdecd4803e0f55d91c76a.JPG

Beautiful dog, Grumpy! I like the brindle coloring.

 

Here's Scout the Thundah Beagle at Mt. Washington this past weekend:

 

20200801_180908.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
ThundahBeagle Enthusiast

ThundahBeagle

Posted
Posted

Scout will really only bay when he's on a hot scent or has visually acquired a rabbit. He will more traditionally bark if theres someone at the door or just outside the house though. Other than that he doesnt really make a noise for not reason, so if he barks or bays, I have to get up and look around to see what he sees.

  • Thanks 1
Epsilon Plus Enthusiast

Epsilon Plus

Posted
Posted
On 8/4/2020 at 1:53 PM, jimbrown1 said:

I have the 5100 shocks with a Rugged Off Road 2" spacer under the front strut.  I couldn't stand the Ranchos and didn't want to use the strut as the lift.  I'm happy with the setup and the ride is great. 

 

On 8/5/2020 at 8:36 AM, ThundahBeagle said:

To @Epsilon Plus

 

Coil-overs work by placing the shock inside the coil spring, but that coil spring has to have an attachment or "perch" location on the shock itself. The Bilstein 5100's have 4 settings. The lowest setting is "stock" height. Top setting is about 1.8 inches above stock.

 

If you have a lift that uses shims above or below your coilover unit, and you are using stock shocks, then you can simply change out your shocks with the 4600's or the 5100's set at the lowest perch setting. Most people get the 5100's INSTEAD of using shims, because the spring perch can be set higher. The shock fluid is not the cause of the lift, the fact that the coil spring sits higher on the shock is what is doing the work. Like choking up on a baseball bat. So for example, you could get rid of the BDS hardware at the front of your truck and just use the Bilstein 5100's at the top setting. Supposedly you will get a better ride quality as well.

 

I have the Bilstein 5100's on my truck and they ride great. Way better than the Ranchos that I took out of there.

 

I hope that helps

 

Both these help.

 

Thanks.

  • 2 weeks later...
Gears and Gadgets Enthusiast

Gears and Gadgets

Posted
Posted

I finally completed my 6112 & 5160 upgrade and I am pretty blown away with how much it changed the dynamics of the truck. The OEM Ranchos felt like they were all spring and no shock and were just very bouncy in general. The 6112’s added needed composure over highway and off-road. 

 

Ryan H New Member

Ryan H

Posted
Posted

I don't drive a 2014+ but I have a 2011 Silverado with 275/55r20 stock wheels and I'm upgrading the suspension this coming month.  I'm awaiting quotes from 2 different shops.  

Planning on 6112's in front at the 3rd setting and 5100 or 5160 in the rear.  My question is are people recommending UCA's for this?  I'd like to avoid spending the money if it's not needed.   I'll prob go with what the shop says, but I'd like to get opinions before I hear back.

 

  • 1 month later...
gastonhector Enthusiast

gastonhector

Posted
Posted
On 8/18/2020 at 2:14 AM, Gears and Gadgets said:

I finally completed my 6112 & 5160 upgrade and I am pretty blown away with how much it changed the dynamics of the truck. The OEM Ranchos felt like they were all spring and no shock and were just very bouncy in general. The 6112’s added needed composure over highway and off-road. 

 

Hello, good video, 

 what rotors do you have?

  • Thanks 1
vivalapalmer New Member

vivalapalmer

Posted
Posted

How do the 5100's ride at 0 with a 2" spacer vs. no spacer but spring perch on the highest setting?

 

What would be better all around for me to do. I currently have a 2" motofab spacer but I'm only looking to clear 33's or a little bit bigger and am willing to not have exactly 2" and remove my motofab rear block and go back to stock.

ThundahBeagle Enthusiast

ThundahBeagle

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, vivalapalmer said:

How do the 5100's ride at 0 with a 2" spacer vs. no spacer but spring perch on the highest setting?

 

What would be better all around for me to do. I currently have a 2" motofab spacer but I'm only looking to clear 33's or a little bit bigger and am willing to not have exactly 2" and remove my motofab rear block and go back to stock.

 

I think you have a couple of points of confusion here. Or I am confused about your post, one or the other. Either way, this response should cover it:

 

Firstly, the front, adjustable Bilstein 5100's are not meant to be used with a spacer. There is no reason to place them at the lowest setting and then use a spacer. If you are going to do that, just put the Bilstein on a higher setting of your choice. Mine are all the way up (almost 2 inches) and I like it. I'm sure the stock setting would be nice as well.

 

Secondly, you mention removing the rear block. The 5100 fronts are adjustable, but the rears are not, so you could still use a rear block if you wanted to.

 

I would think that 33's would fit with 2 inches of lift. They tuck 33's under the Trail Boss. That has 2 inches of lift and people sometimes say the 33's look small on it. I dont say that, but some people do.

 

I hope this helps.

vivalapalmer New Member

vivalapalmer

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, ThundahBeagle said:

 

I think you have a couple of points of confusion here. Or I am confused about your post, one or the other. Either way, this response should cover it:

 

Firstly, the front, adjustable Bilstein 5100's are not meant to be used with a spacer. There is no reason to place them at the lowest setting and then use a spacer. If you are going to do that, just put the Bilstein on a higher setting of your choice. Mine are all the way up (almost 2 inches) and I like it. I'm sure the stock setting would be nice as well.

 

Secondly, you mention removing the rear block. The 5100 fronts are adjustable, but the rears are not, so you could still use a rear block if you wanted to.

 

I would think that 33's would fit with 2 inches of lift. They tuck 33's under the Trail Boss. That has 2 inches of lift and people sometimes say the 33's look small on it. I dont say that, but some people do.

 

I hope this helps.

Yes, it does help somewhat! Thanks for the response. I know the rears are not adjustable, I had full 5100's on my tacoma. I just know that with the 2" spacer the front looked nose high, and with 1.85", I think if I went back to stock the truck might look similar. I only added the rear block because the 2" spacer up front was too much.

 

But thanks for clearing that up, if I want 5100's all around, then dont use the spacer. I'm worried because to use the 2" motofab spacer you have to cut some of the studs off on the shock mount. Hopefully there is still enough bolt to get the shock mount in with the spacer out, securely.

  • 3 weeks later...
ForumUser Enthusiast

ForumUser

Posted
Posted

So, I read dozens of the pages on this thread - didn't find my question discussed ?

 

2017 Silverado High Country with 6.2L - I would like to "tighten" up the handling without raising, lowering, etc ... don't mind a bit harder ride, but really hate it when this things starts hanging in corners like on sharp interstate exits ...

 

I put Bilstein HDs on an older Ford SportTrac and it was an amazing difference ...

 

Thanks!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hdwrguy
      2027 Chevrolet Silverado: Official Discussion

      By Hdwrguy · Posted

      So after reading the reveal from Chevrolet, I kept asking myself...why did the trim levels change?   Here are the official ones:   Work Truck (WT): The quintessential fleet truck, built with durable, easy-to-clean interiors for commercial or utilitarian use. Custom: A stylish, road-oriented trim that adds a more refined appearance, standard dual exhaust, and modern exterior styling. Custom Trail Boss: An entry-level off-roader featuring a 2-inch factory suspension lift and 34-inch mud-terrain tires on a budget. Silverado: Serving as the new base consumer truck (replacing the previous LT trim), it comes standard with the Z71 off-road package when equipped with 4WD. Trail Boss: Steps up the off-road hardware with the 2-inch lift, 34-inch tires, monotube shocks, an exclusive off-road hood, and more premium interior options. ZR2: The flagship off-roader. It boasts 35-inch mud-terrain tires, Multimatic DSSV dampers, front and rear electronic lockers, forged carbon-fiber interior accents, and an available hardcore Bison Edition (co-developed with AEV). High Country: The pinnacle of luxury. It replaces bright chrome with modern satin chrome, 22-inch wheels, premium leather, real wood interior trim, a panoramic sunroof, and an exclusive front-passenger touchscreen. As others have stated, why would you want a Silverado - 'Silverado' - wth?? LT needs to remain!!!   Also, there will no longer be a dedicated Z71 model.  All 4x4 trucks will have the Z71 package. Carplay is also something that cannot be removed.  Hopefully it will remain.     I am excited about the 5.7L V8 (350 C.I.D.)  Old school Chevy power.  My only concern is whatever version of AFM/DFM cylinder deactivation.  Too bad that isn't an option a buyer can choose to have or not.   I will definitely be stopping by my local dealership when these trucks start showing up.
    • richard wysong
      Gas Prices

      By richard wysong · Posted

      I haven't seen diesel for less than $5.30 anywhere in my area
    • Chuck FB
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      The not as clean as one would assume theme with the new engine oil, that reminds me of comments over the years with mechanics not always being so on board with filling an oil filter, not from the center anyway due to that typically being the clean side of the filter, danger of some contaminant falling into the filter if not careful but the realization now that the oil may not be as pure as one had assumed it would surely be. Yes it would be possible to fill from the small holes but that means messing with something to prop open the anti drain back valve if the filter is so equipped and not damage that valve in the process. Me, I have hardly ever prefilled an engine oil filter however I have prefilled diesel fuel filters with a filter on a fuel bulk tank and for anyone that has messed with diesel engines with filters and units that have a limited or no way of priming them, putting on a dry filter is a bad day to say the least with those crappy systems. But anyway back to not so clean engine oil, indeed perhaps its not so bad after all that I have not made a practice of prefilling oil filters.    As Grumpy Bear commented on keeping things clean, that I really have to wonder what the typical practice is at a dealer or any other shop that changes engine oil, do they make sure to wipe or wash off the oil plug and certainly if it fell into some gunk or onto a dirty floor, or that they wiped the filter mounting flange and didn't go and use some dirty rag and end up adding dirt to the inside of the head of the filter mount. Or be careless in how they stored or handled the new filter and if they were bumping into items under the vehicle with the filter opening facing up and having dirt drop right into the filter and if so right into the threaded center that is on the clean side. The top side, did they clean away the built up gunk that may be around the filler before removing the cap or to be really careful at that point that something right close to the filler hole that was hidden under the caps flange won't fall into the engine. Or did they clean the funnel or was that just laying there covered in oil from the oil change before and dust kicked up from sweeping the floor stuck to the oil and now that will go running into the next persons engine due to just not cleaning the funnel as "they won't know anyway" attitude as that young guy is more worried about taking a break so he can go outside and smoke a joint. Just random points that came to mind when I think about what some hired personnel may do that the shop foreman has no idea of or perhaps the whole attitude of some shops may be "eh ... who cares, they will never know the difference anyway".  
    • CamGTP
      Gas Prices

      By CamGTP · Posted

      $3.69 for 87 octane.   $4.24 for Diesel in town.
    • Atlas
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Atlas · Posted

      On the subject of OLM, Gm's OLM tool may be more "informed" than others brands. I recall OLM's in mid-2000's Chrysler products literally counting down a set number of miles. That's all the OLM appeared to be.    I would actually expect GM to be able to explain the parameters that their OLM takes into account from a high level. No, I would not expect them to disclose their software coding or data analysis around their parameters.   So we're talking about two different topics, so to continue the subject on the other one, I'd be curious to know how much "standard particulate matter" in fresh oil is able to be filtered at first start by a fresh oil filter. How much particulate matter is enough to "matter"?   I.e. how much of a "lever" do we think this equates to (variability in particulate content, in fresh oils, between different makes/brands, some which filter less, and some that filter more).   We can say that more particles = more wear = shorter engine life as a logical statement and use that data with a little marketing to scare people into selecting a more refined/filtered oil. Using a similie, is this like deciding to forego two alcoholic drinks in a lifetime because we're worried about the potential impact on lifespan? Are there numbers which translate the ISO test results into a quantifiable increase in wear for a given engine/use case?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...