Jump to content

Rear Directional Failure warning


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have had the same failure also, but I have aftermarket led Anzo tailights. Everything works. But every once in a while I will get that message and next time I use the blinker it's fine.

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

tail light lens might be dirty did you clean it . ha ha

Posted

Ok so I changed both rear directional bulbs and checked both of the fuses (which are both good) and it still does it. I also unhooked the battery and reconeccted it. I have no idea what to do now... wtf

Did you change all 4 rear light bulbs? If not, WHY???!

Posted

In one of you're previous posts you commented on adding some form of signal lighting, re: Hideaway Light kits on their Sierra for plowing or EMS.

 

Have you made any modifications to the truck?, could be the cause if so.

  • 3 years later...
Posted
On 3/15/2015 at 11:53 AM, JKeshler23 said:

Ok so I changed both rear directional bulbs and checked both of the fuses (which are both good) and it still does it. I also unhooked the battery and reconeccted it. I have no idea what to do now... wtf

Can you tell me where the fuses are ?

I have a left rear error on my dash, replaced both bulbs but no luck.  Brake light on that side is also dead

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I know what you're talkin about because mine's doing the same thing I replace both bulbs and it still continues to do it I have not checked the fuse yet I just read about the fuse here now so I will check the fuse on mine and see if it fixes it

Posted

But also my rear bulb sockets were very corroded because they never put bulb grease on the bulbs in the factory check your sockets for corrosion and if so put bulb grease on all bulbs also preventive maintenance

Posted

Just got mine back from the dealer....

On the 2014 GMC Sierra THERE IS NO FUSE for the rear turn signal/brake lights. They go directly to the body control module. On my truck they found some corroded wires under the dash. They repaired them and now my lights work as they should.

Posted
On 4/25/2019 at 6:50 AM, Whatever64 said:

This was under the dashboard.....   not near the bulb end.  I think that harness might be a little more

What do you mean this was under the dashboard. What was ?

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Yeah I'm going to have to check my so you guys said there is no fuse for the turn signals for our 2015 Chevy Silverado?..because my left rear turn signal failure is still popping up and I'm trying to figure it out right now

Posted

Fuse F46DR in IP right side fuse box. Left turn/ stop lamp fuse.

Fuse F45DR in same fuse box. Right turn/stop lamp.  Both 15a. Somebody's dealer needs to learn how to read a schematic.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I wonder as well, why they would send me a text message with links to these suggested procedures totalling over $10,000 without even the slightest hint of how they arrived at these being necessary.
    • https://precisionlubrication.com/articles/oil-filter-efficiency/     For them it is a problem of $$$$ and compliance. To cover both they have to lie from the heart.    Government wants low waste oil numbers so the bar needs to be very low on contamination to met that requirement.  Consumer wants cheap maintenance (perceived cost). Again requiring a low bar.  OEM wants high margins at a cost effective warranty rate and lots of repeat customers. More low bar.  Filter manufacture wants the same thing the OEM wants. See the pattern?   Consumers are fickle and also want perfection requiring a HIGH bar. Inconsistent with all of the above. Consumers can be, when the put their minds to it, inquisitive, love winning arguments which requires some useful information to be available to support them. And this is where it gets sticky and the lies begin.    Information needs a solid well grounded point of reference if we are to compare in a useful way. There is a standard for this.  ISO 4548-12. This standard sets the particle size at a specific Beta ratio and darn few are faithful to its intent.    If they don't state the test method they change the particle size or the Beta ratio to hit a perceived favorable standard. They obscure the information in a way as to prevent direct comparisons leaving the consumer with one method. UOA's with an ISO 4406 test result. Pricey and not allot of labs willing to do the work. Lobby work happens everywhere, not just at the seat of government.       
    • IF,IF,IF. If they cared about quality instead of profit and this applies to any company, what a concept. 
    • Good Morning Gents..hope everyone is enjoying a beautiful saturday morning. I have a 2001 GMC Sierra that I bought used in 2018. I am the 2nd owner and its a beautiful truck. Ive put about 60,000 miles on it and recently the front end has felt funny. Kind of loose when hitting bumps adn sometimes I actually feel a "bang" in the steering wheel. I took it to a local guy who said that everything was tight and he tightened the steering box. It didnt feel much better, so I had him replace the front shocks, which had noto been done since I bought it. It had the check enging light on so I took it into a local garage to fix that and check out the suspension. Everything is original and the rubber bushings that I can see look bad. They said everything was tight and there wasnt any play in the front end. Im concerned about the banging feeling in the wheel. Ive been driving this truck for 8 years, so I know how it usually feels and this is something new. Its a second vehicle, so I dont drive it all the time, but Im trying to use it more often. I live out in the country and some of the  roads are kind of rough and I alive on gravel roads. Anyone deal with anything like this before? 
    • Yes of course. There’s no experience in the Trump organization in hiring contractors. it’s not like they’re experienced in that field.😆
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...