Jump to content

5th wheel with 1/2 ton


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

It's not the tow weight, it's the payload you'll be over on. These trucks max out on payload way before towing capacity.

Posted

Sounds like you are another who bought the wrong truck to tow your toys. Seems to be going on a lot lately for some reason.

You need to buy a 3500HD to safely load your truck and tow a giant 5th wheel. You are going to be severely over capacity with truck loaded, passangers, and the camper loaded.

 

Please do not put people in danger, go buy the proper truck for the job.

 

 

Sent from my crappy iPhone 6

using Tapatalk

Posted

Yeah, even empty that trailer is pushing the limits. Also note, while RV companies are notorious for selling people more trailer than they can handle, even Jayco only recommends that trailer with a 6.2 Max Tow.

Posted

When you're shopping...ignore the catalogue specs. If you're ordering call the factory if not go by the sticker.

Posted

Sounds like you are another who bought the wrong truck to tow your toys. Seems to be going on a lot lately for some reason.

You need to buy a 3500HD to safely load your truck and tow a giant 5th wheel. You are going to be severely over capacity with truck loaded, passangers, and the camper loaded.

 

Please do not put people in danger, go buy the proper truck for the job.

 

 

Sent from my crappy iPhone 6

using Tapatalk

Agreed but a 3/4 would more than do the job on this.

Posted

Yeah, and if it's only a couple times a year a 3/4 ton would be overkill. These trailers are specifically made to be pulled by 1/2 tons. If you've got a 3/4 ton, why not get a nicer, heavier trailer?

 

I think that's exactly the kind of use Nissan was talking about with the new Titan. It'll be interesting to see where they rate its payload and towing capacity. With the arbitrarily added 400 lbs of payload, the 2015 GM NHT's could pull this trailer and stay within the limits (if as-built specs match the catalog) but a little more payload capacity wouldn't hurt.

Posted

When you're shopping...ignore the catalogue specs. If you're ordering call the factory if not go by the sticker.

Yep, some of the weights stated online or in catalogues are lower than actual weights...

Posted

Yeah, and if it's only a couple times a year a 3/4 ton would be overkill. These trailers are specifically made to be pulled by 1/2 tons. If you've got a 3/4 ton, why not get a nicer, heavier trailer?

 

I think that's exactly the kind of use Nissan was talking about with the new Titan. It'll be interesting to see where they rate its payload and towing capacity. With the arbitrarily added 400 lbs of payload, the 2015 GM NHT's could pull this trailer and stay within the limits (if as-built specs match the catalog) but a little more payload capacity wouldn't hurt.

I dont know about saying these trailers are built to be hauled by 1/2 tons. The problem is not the gross weight its the hitch weight,by the time you put two bodies in the truck your already over the payload weight. You only have 3-400lbs left tops. Doesnt mean it cant do it, but you will bust the listed limit.

 

I own a fifth wheel and most of them arent being hauled by half tons, probably for a reason.

 

But a couple times a year, maybe you can get away with it.

Posted

I dont know about saying these trailers are built to be hauled by 1/2 tons. The problem is not the gross weight its the hitch weight,by the time you put two bodies in the truck your already over the payload weight. You only have 3-400lbs left tops. Doesnt mean it cant do it, but you will bust the listed limit.

 

I own a fifth wheel and most of them arent being hauled by half tons, probably for a reason.

 

But a couple times a year, maybe you can get away with it.

I certainly don't disagre that pin weight is likely to be the issue, but 1/2 ton tow ratings assume there will be two front seat passengers, but no allowance for cargo. 3/4 assume driver only.

 

From the 2015 OM:

 

Trailer weight rating (TWR) for 1500
series trucks is calculated assuming
the tow vehicle has the driver, a
front seat passenger, and all
required trailering equipment.
Weight of additional optional
equipment, passengers, and
cargo in the tow vehicle must be
subtracted from the trailer weight
rating.
Trailer weight rating (TWR) for
2500 and 3500 series trucks is
calculated assuming the tow vehicle
has only the driver but all required
trailering equipment. Weight of
additional optional equipment,
passengers, and cargo in the tow
vehicle must be subtracted from the
trailer weight rating.
Posted

I dont know about saying these trailers are built to be hauled by 1/2 tons.

 

I wasn’t talking about 5th wheels in general, I was talking about that specific line of trailers. Their “Lightweight Fun” line: http://www.jayco.com/products/fifth-wheels/2015-eagle-ht/ Specifically built lightweight for 1/2 tons.

 

If you have a big manly truck, they have several other lines with dry pin weights of 2000-3000 lbs. They may look the same to the untrained eye, but I'm guessing the heavy sucker will be nicer to live in if you spend a lot of time in it (and have a truck that can pull it).

Posted

I say judge for yourself. Buying a diesel is a waste for a 28'. 30', old heavy camper yeah. These new ones are light and 4 wheel brakes on the trailer work great. If you buy a 6.0 gas 2500 you will kill on mpg and power. Dunno why gm can't put a 6.2 in the 2500 yet.

 

Just make sure your tires are OK. They put 4 plies on at the factory.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,837
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    bellssn690
    Newest Member
    bellssn690
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 2 Anonymous, 831 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Interesting, I suspect I would have fueled up in Lee Vining as the day prior I would have filled up either in Laughlin or near there and maybe again before I entered Death Valley and once out the other side late that evening as I kept on driving into the night up near Lee Vining. Next morning I most likely fueled up in LV before heading over Tioga Pass into ( as I refer to it as "Yose .... Mite" 😁 ). And again that was 19 years ago but the price then must not have jumped out at me like the 5 bill a gallon theme of nutty cult hippy country Big Sir or head so far up their rear Aspen. I'd be curious to know where the highest prices are in the lower 48, I probably would not be far off to guess somewhere in Cali forn ie. Coldfoot and Prudhoe bay may have those prices beat but that is a whole other world up there and when prices are more normal elsewhere that is about what they can be up there I believe in no mans land. Anyway interesting that the 395 corridor is hosing people and the thing is, its tourist season and its not like there are a lot of competition options when driving up that highway from what I could see. Yup, big ole Boaterhomes and various other RV's ahead and behind me at the Yosemite entrance gate and they have to get their fuel somewhere.  
    • Those can be high, as well as the big California cities. The ones that will pop your eyes out are the 395 corridor on the Eastern side of the Sierra Nevadas. Lee Vining, $7.19 for regular and $8.89 for diesel is what the Google said right now.
    • Correct.  2019-2021 model years are serviced by a different p/n.  19420611.  Recall 2021s use 19420611.   The recall engines 2022-2024 model years are serviced with 12740076.     The difference between 19420611 and 12740076 is GM changed injector size for 2022.  The injectors are smaller on 12740076 with smaller injector bores in the cylinder heads to match the smaller injectors.  So you can't install a 19420611 in a 2022-2024, and you can't install a 12740076 in a 2019-2021.     Both engines are the replacement engine p/ns that are in the L87 recall.  So both of these are the updated engines.     Here's a version of the L87 recall with the p/ns for all the parts needed.    RCRIT-25V274-7075.pdf   Note it shows 19420611 and 12740076 with an asterisk to a footnote "Use the VIN and the GM Electronic Parts Catalog (EPC) to determine which part to order if two or more part numbers are listed for the same part, as it may vary by vehicle options."    
    • Looking for advice from this group. Took my flawless 2020 6.2 TB to an unnamed shop for routine rear brakes and oil change. Tech forgot to put oil back in after the full service and needles to say, destroyed my engine.  It’s all on their shop video so they are responsible.   I had my Chevy dealer do the analysis and they confirmed its compromised and said engine replacement. The manager said they only get GM reman engines from GM with full 3 yr warranty and the one they would put in is not same as what’s they are swapping out on 21-25 for recall.    I am looking for advice why that would be a different engine because obviously I had the good 6.2 year and replacing it has my concerns with that recall for 21-15   Also what’s the pros and cons of accepting the engine swap vs telling the shop that bricked the truck to pay up so I buy a new truck. I’m concerned about stigma resale eventually if I just decide to get rid of it after the swap or other issues showing up after the swap out.  
    • Just looked up my records.  I've never gone over 5000 miles between oil changes.  At 46K miles, I have 10 oil changes.  I hope that will help.  I also installed the disabler last year.  I've still had a few times when it didn't seem to engage (which I can tell because the start stop feature kicks in), but for the most part, I think it's working.  For some reason, GM did not include the number of cylinders running in the information screen like I had on other models.  In my Cadillac, it shows me when it's running on 4 cylinders on the fuel milage screen.  I can't find that on my '21 Denali.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...