Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

How did we ever live without these things?

 

 

This is what frustrates me about the purchasing process. I was in my local dealer looking at a '15 Sierra a few days ago, and I specifically asked the salesman about updates, and he told me they were completely free. I asked because not only did our '08 Yukon require paid updates, but they were never available!

 

As stupid as it sounds, the infotainment in these GMs has been my #1 excuse for holding out on a new vehicle for the past two years. The nav in that Yukon was just plain awful; the route it chose was often inefficient, gave us wrong directions a few times, and we were forced to use 6 year old maps towards the end. My wife's '14 Acadia is better, but still seems clunky to use.

 

I don't know what to do. Mayble I'll just get a '15 and start shopping for aftermarket units that support Android Auto.

 

 

My 2014 is the first OEM Nav equipped vehicle for me. My wife bought Ford Flex with nav the year before. Hers is better, but not as easy as a Garmin either.

 

If I were doing it again, I'd just set aside some money for an aftermarket nav-radio. This is the one I'd get. http://alpine-usa.com/product/view/x008u/

 

This shows the installation in the 2014-15 GM

http://www.access1alarm.com/vehicle-specific/chevrolet/silverado/navigation-8-silverado

Posted (edited)

I prefer the free NAV method. iPhone using either the Apple maps or Google maps. Free updates and works perfectly! I'll never ever buy NAV in a vehicle as it's a complete waste of money IMO. GM is not the only manufacture that charges for the updates just so you guys know. I work for Toyota and we charge the same here. Updates come out late October and generally run $170 per update.

Edited by Sooperdave
Posted

Google Maps, but lately I've been using Waze more so it gives me locations of cops, debris, traffic jams etc. I'm really liking the app, however it can drain your battery a bit, but better than it use to be.

Posted

Just saw a story on the news about this tonight. A guy bought a 2015 3500HD, which apparently was made 3/14, so he ended up with an old software version with outdated maps. According to the story, a new version came out in August, so he was able to get updated after a call to GM.

  • 3 months later...
Posted

The worst part about these updates is they are usually still out of date despite having the latest and greatest one. Routinely they are missing roads that were added in the last 2-5 years or even some that have been around for decades.

 

When I bought my new 2015 LTZ I did actually want the NAV. Mainly, for the 8-inch screen however rarely use it. I rely on WAZE almost 90% of the time and google/apple maps/onboard nav the other 10%. I wanted it in the vehicle for those times where I have zero cell coverage which happens more often than you think when off road or out in the desert or the like. I don't regret the purchase really. It is a nice redundancy though when needed.

 

I am just going to assume that carplay will not be added to our 2015 and older vehicles even though we have the IO6 system and the like. I was under the impression it was going to be on 2014/2015 model years but never got implemented.

 

The aftermarket systems have almost all of the integrated systems beat.

In a couple years maybe depending on how much of my factory integration I can keep I will most likely get a pioneer system to replace the factory. such as the AVIC or APPRADIO models.

 

Sorry for getting off topic a bit.

Posted (edited)

I'm about ready to go back to paper.... factory nav is always useless and can't find the address even if it's in a place that's 100 years old. Not only that but the method to input is almost always a fight. However lately Google has been an utter fail too and sends me to places that don't exist because it's a couple streets off.... even if I have the correct address entered. I don't know what's going on there as it keeps happening more frequently to me. Paper at least is right as long as the street existed at the time of publishing.

 

Sent from a potato

Edited by 1994Vmax
Posted

In car nav is nice for one thing, anticipating up coming roads on low visibility weather conditions. This is what I mainly use it for.

Posted

I have the NAV on my truck. Didn't particularly want it, but the truck had everything else I wanted, when I wanted it. Google Maps on a smartphone is a better way to go. She even speaks through the bluetooth, which is nice. Plus, it's always automatically updated. You could use Siri, but she's likely to drive you into a lake...

 

 

100% agree!

 

My Denali has NAV and I absolutely hate it! It sucks, plain and simple.

 

The voice recognition software GM uses is a joke!

 

I cannot tell you how many times I tried using it and was cussing up a storm.

 

I stick with Google Maps on my Nexus 6 over bluetooth. It works and Google has the absolute best voice recognition software in the world, IMO

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Built-in nav is worthless for actually programming a destination and following it, but great for just generally getting a bearing of where you are, what roads are ahead, possible shortcuts, side roads, etc.

Posted (edited)

The Nav software is copyrighted like all other software. It only works with one VIN, the one you need to provide to buy it.

Btw - It took almost 2 hrs to complete the update, was 2 disks for the CTS.

 

DSC00182_zps81c318d0.jpg

DSC00181_zpsc5189ba3.jpg

Edited by elcamino
Posted

I have it on mine and the wife's vehicles and it is horrible. The screen mirroring on the 2016s will be nice if it allows full use.

 

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Posted

The 2nd day I owned my 2015 All Terrain I programmed in the 6.8mi drive to my office, there were 3 MAJOR errors in the mapping. One error was attributed to an interstate name change dating back to 2012. I was so pissed, then I found out that GM disabled the HD radio (advertised feature on the window sticker) and the iPhone interface was handicapped. Just unacceptable. I called the intellilink support line and they were less than worthless. I asked then for a map update at least, GM declined and said I could ask the dealership and hope they give it to me on goodwill (aka make the dealer pay for it) which is chickenshit if you ask me... The dealer did their job, GM set the expectation with the consumer.

  • 10 months later...
Posted

Can you use the NAV without an Onstar subscription? The maps in my 2016 GMC Sierra are way out of whack. Roads that have been in place for years don't show up. According to the website, mine should be up to date. Poor excuse for a NAV system in a $56K truck.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...