Jump to content

VW Head Quits - Chevy Cruze Only Affordable Diesel Car In US


Recommended Posts

Posted

post-139450-0-44646300-1443025825_thumb.jpg

John Goreham
Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com
9/23/2015

Martin Winterkorn, the head of Volkswagen, the world's largest automaker by sales volume quit today. Winterkorn, an engineer known as a micromanager said “As CEO I accept responsibility for the irregularities that have been found in diesel engines and have therefore requested the Supervisory Board to agree on terminating my function as CEO of the Volkswagen Group. I am doing this in the interests of the company even though I am not aware of any wrongdoing on my part.” VW has suspended sales of its affected diesel cars in the U.S. market. Although many journalists have expressed the opinion that VW is "owning up to" the widespread emissions cheating, that is debatable. Researchers in Europe were on to the cheating as far back as 2011. In the U.S. when the EPA confronted VW about the mismatch between road observable NOx emissions and the output during emissions testing sessions, VW stonewalled. It took the threat by EPA of not approving VW's 2016 models for sale to get VW to admit it had cheated.

 

The 2015 Chevy Cruze diesel is the last affordable family car in the U.S. with a diesel powerplant. Chevy has not announced details on a 2016 and the EPA has not certified it yet. The Cruze offers good drivability, but its fuel economy rating is only average for the class at 33 MPG combined. The gasoline Cruze Diesel Eco matches that number. The Toyota Corolla LE Eco earns a 35 MPG rating, which we exceeded in our testing of the car. Most of the top sellers in the affordable compact sedan and hatchback class can match the combined EPA rating of Chevy and VW's diesel cars.

post-139450-0-44646300-1443025825_thumb.jpg

post-139450-0-44646300-1443025825_thumb.jpg

post-139450-0-44646300-1443025825_thumb.jpg

Posted

2017 for Cruze Diesel again. 2015 is the last year for the current body style, as for the 2016 Cruze Limited they dropped the engine. 2016 new Cruze doesn't get it at launch, but for 2017.

 

From 2016 new Cruze press release:

New for 2016

 

  • Larger and lighter; all-new compact car is more agile with a dynamic driving experience
  • All-new, standard 1.4L turbo engine with direct injection offers a GM-estimated 40 mpg highway; stop/start technology contributes to efficiency in stop-and-go driving
  • New Chevrolet MyLink offers better performance, plus compatibility with both Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, for smart, simple smartphone integration
  • Advanced safety features include Side Blind Zone Alert, Rear Cross-Traffic Alert, Lane Keep Assist and Forward Collision Alert
  • On sale in the U.S. in early 2016; diesel model follows in 2017

 

 

 

And from the 2016 Cruze Limited order guide: http://www.gmfleetorderguide.com/NASApp/domestic/newfeatures.jsp?year=2016&regionID=1&lang=1&divisionID=3&vehicleID=17843

 

Deletions:

-Diesel model (1PY69)

 

 

 

 

Posted

Yor article seems to be incorrect. I have read mutiple articles that said VW spilled thr beans fairly quickly, I think some even quoted the EPA to that point. This is 'Murica so VW will get drug through the mud no matter how much they try to make it right, I'm blow away they have gone this far so quickly. I have never owned a VW product so I couldn't care less, but am surprised (although I knew of VW speciality shop that looked like it had severely overworked mechanics, made me shy of the brand)

 

The letter you link too is dates Sept 18. VW admitted in July 2015 according to the Autoblog timeline. ( http://www.autoblog.com/2015/09/22/how-volkswagen-cheating-probe-developed/ )

 

It took the EPA two months to wind up the PR machine....yeah, it was that important to them that after VW ADMITTED the problem)

Posted

Why is America so full of self hating people? Even when VW gets caught gaming the EPA and basically refusing to do anything about it, they're a victim and it's the EPA to fault because America wants to ruin a lying, cheating foreign company.

 

VW deserves every fine they get.

Posted

Why is America so full of self hating people? Even when VW gets caught gaming the EPA and basically refusing to do anything about it, they're a victim and it's the EPA to fault because America wants to ruin a lying, cheating foreign company.

 

VW deserves every fine they get.

Right on queue!

:lol:

 

 

If it was such a big deal, the EPA should have taken action immediately. Not more than 60 days later.

 

Just like the GM thing. NHTSA dropped the ball, plently of evidence years before they did anything that mattered. Now will be a knee jerk reaction, there is already talk of investigating the entire industry to find more cheaters.

 

Gee, it's almost like they should have been doing that the whole time.....the fine is as much for cheating as it is for the EPA getting caught flat footed. It over a year ago that WV sent their findings to the EPA.

Posted

Press releases are often lower on the list of things a regulator has to do. Finding all the facts is the higher priority than going off half-baked to the press. "Taking action" doesn't mean blabbing to the press. It means investigating to get the full set of facts before they can do anything else.

Posted

Press releases are often lower on the list of things a regulator has to do. Finding all the facts is the higher priority than going off half-baked to the press. "Taking action" doesn't mean blabbing to the press. It means investigating to get the full set of facts before they can do anything else.

It takes a year to get a vehicle hooked up to different test equipment? Wow, we just expect that now? EPA could have sent someone down to WVU the to verify their claims immediately.

 

 

Euro investigators found GM may be involved in a similiar scam in Europe, along with MB and BMW.

 

http://www.autoblog.com/2015/09/23/german-automakers-us-diesel-emissions/

Posted

All I can say is my Cruze diesel is a great little car and I'm averaging 48mpg. The new body style looks good and it is 250lbs lighter. It also has a new 1.4l all aluminum engine with a nice hp increase.

 

 

Sent from my MaxiPad

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 286,740 Mile Services   8/6/2026   New AC Compressor. Refrigerant oil and dye, evacuate and charge system.  New exhaust system from cat back.  New Iridium plugs plus replace #3 coil Repair/rewire headlamp wiring (passenger side) and replace all forward bulbs. Polish lenses of both assemblies.  Pull rear rotors, clean and adjust parking assembly. Inspect, clean and grease front calipers. Check pads and shoes.  4 wheel power bleed of brake system. Dot 4 Reset idle speed 50 rpm higher New Serpentine belt.    Will need new pads in the rear in about 5K more miles.    Tax Title and License out the door just short of a grand.    AC clutch had bitten the dust. 1 year warranty on the pick and save replacement. Thing will make a Polar Bear cry Uncle.  He spent quite some time on the wiring. It was in the harness and he does nothing half. I got off cheap. I have considerable more light down the road. Sylvania Silver Star replacements.  Gas seal between the porcelain and shell of plug #3 was blown, cooked the coil. That was the cold miss.  Love the new exhaust. I can sneak into the neighborhood again.    This was one of her bigger bills and still way cheaper than a payment even given the oil consumption. This thing cost me under a hundred a month in repairs and normal routine costs. What is my incentive to replace it? 🤔           
    • hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...