Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

You could try this.

Silverado Firefighter and 2010 Silverado.

If it was me I would drive them with the trans in M5 to keep the engine out of V4 mode and see if oil consumption changes.

If it helps get a Range. :happysad:

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

30k on mine with no consumption issues. I go the full 7-8k miles between changes. I do have a Range device as well

Posted

Just adding my 2 cents opinion on the aluminum 5.3l v4/8 and AFM oil consumption issues. Followed it closely on the Avalanche forum because I had those engines in my '11 Tahoe and '07, '12 and '13 Avys.

 

The redesigned V4/8 AFM introduced in the '07 gen2 Avys and sister chassis had two major design defects causing oil consumption that would begin after 40K miles. The first involved a poorly placed PCV pickup that would suck oil from the valve cover.....it was redesigned in '09 with two different versions for the '07 & '08 and vehicles were retrofitted with the new covers based on oil consumption complaints. The second major defect was the location of the AFM oil discharge valve in the crankcase. The location of the discharged oil would overload the rings on the AFM cylinders (#1 cyl in particular) which were inactive in V4 operation, there being no pressure on the piston during the power stroke and its effect on the oil film on their cylinder wall of the "dead" cylinder. This was addressed with production beginning after 1/11 by the retrofitting of a shield over the AFM discharge valve that blocked the four horizontal discharge ports, directing all oil directly downward into the sump instead of being sprayed against the AFM cylinders. The oil consumption resulted because the excess oil would buildup and gum up the lower oil control rings which could not flex and properly remove oil from the cylinder walls which would burn up. Solutions under warranty included installation of the AFM valve baffle and chemical cleaning of the pistons, failing that, the next step was replacement of the piston set.

 

My '07s unmodified engine had 40K+ and never needed oil between changes. BUT, I changed oil and filter every 3K so can't say if it would have with the recommended 9K change if I was to follow the engine killing Oil Life Meter. I assumed that the post 1/11 production and later engines with redesigned valve lifters for the AFM cylinders had adequately addressed the problem so I traded the '11 Tahoe and '07 Avy for '12 and '13s which came with all the AFM correcting mods. Never had an oil burning problem with them but again 3K changes and not over 40K miles. And I live in a mountain area where very few roads are flat and the engine operates in V8 most of the time. Also I used the Range device as a precaution to keep the the engine in V8 when on long trips out of State on flat roads because otherwise under those conditions it would run almost exclusively in V4.

 

I have no doubt that had I followed that engine killing oil life meter and changed the oil when indicated at every 10% at 9K miles on a 6 qt. crankcase that dirty oil would have gummed up the rings on my '07. Hopefully GM has also changed the operating algorithm on the OLMs of Silverado/Sierra to compensate for prolonged V4 operation (the 25% oil increase in the crankcase should also help) for a more realistic oil change schedule to prevent piston problems on the new AFM engine's pistons.

Posted

40K on my odometer. Truck is complete stock, oil changed everytime the DIC warning comes on. I use 0W20 synthetic and change my own oil. Has yet to be low on oil everytime i check and when i change.

Posted

Back in the seventies you were happy to get 100k miles out of the engine@ oil changes every 3k.before oil consumption. Now 200k an a small block is normal at extended drains. I don't think GM figured out a magic way to kill an engine just after warrant with the ( engine killing oil life monitor). There was a problem with V8-V4 in some of the early 5.3s most people egnored it and added oil,some people used different mods to keep it in V8 mode to stop oil consumption. Oil change intervals had no effect unless you never changed it.

Posted

My recent purchase of the '16 Malibu 1.5T confirmed that the OLM is an engine killer or at best an easily fooled POS because it's magical algorithm doesn't properly anticipate or integrate all real world conditions.

 

Vehicle came off the showroom floor with 286 miles on the odometer and the OLM read only 60% of oil life remaining. The oil on the dipstick was so clean you felt you cook fries in it! Compare that with the 3K oil change on my Traverse where the OLM indicated 80% oil life still remaining. Dealer claimed that since the keyless start fob remained in the vehicle so customers could work the features/accessories, the OLM counted that as vehicle operating time. And I didn't coin the term engine killer for the OLM, a Chevy mechanic did.

Posted

I had a few vehicles with the olm, they never would trigger at the same time, must be another trick they came up with that makes us think they really work. Can't be they really monitor the way drive, idle mantain near constant RPMs like hwy driving etc. After all the have to do is get pass the warranty than all is clear. The guy at the dealer is saying change more often because he's tying to sell service.... Naa.

Posted

I just traded in my wife's 2003 Yukon with 208,000 miles. I always waited for the OLM to go off before changing the oil - never had any engine problems. It did burn a little oil - maybe a quart between changes (~7k miles).

 

I'll be doing the same with my current trucks after the free dealer changes.

Posted

3600 miles and changed out the original oil/filter for 0W20 Mobil 1 and a Mobil 1 filter. :driving:

Posted

There's an interesting article in the last Truck Trend magazine about oil consumption in the new trucks (all new trucks). Gives a lot of insight into use of 20 - 0 weight oil, new engine designs, etc. if you can find this article I recommend reading it. I would post it but I subscribe to the paper version.

  • 1 year later...
Posted

Same problem here. I was a quart and a half low 4000 miles into a 5000 mile oil change. GM told me that is normal oil consumption. So basically I paid a lot of money for a truck that consumes oil. Should've gone with a Tundra.....

Posted

Same problem here. I was a quart and a half low 4000 miles into a 5000 mile oil change. GM told me that is normal oil consumption. So basically I paid a lot of money for a truck that consumes oil. Should've gone with a Tundra.....

Is your truck new and under warranty? You should not need to top up between oil changes. Keep a log and receipts of your oil purchases. I had an oil consumption issue with my last truck. It took time and effort to get beyond GM's definition of normal but they eventually fixed the problem. Keep on good terms with your service adviser and hopefully he or she will speed you through the hoops!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
    • // Thank you, also for your  response. More information is always good. This 2013 GMC is most likely my 'forever truck"-I'm 77 and retired...and truck only has 42K on it-very clean-so I try to keep it that way.  Tks again for your  response- glenn
    • I started my install this weekend. Everything was pretty straight forward but I ran into one issue with running power through the firewall. The nipple grommet on my High Country already has a small harness running through it - has anyone else ran into this issue? And on the engine bay side, does the wire basically just penetrate the factory wiring boot? I did this on my '22 Trail Boss and it seems much easier but thats been a few years. My other thought would be possibly drilling a new hole adding a rubber grommet just to the lower left of the factory hole. Thoughts?   Has anyone used a T-harness off the Bose amp and obtained power from there? It seems a little odd that such a small amp needs 3 power leads
    • ///// Ok--Thanks for that info--I could not find yesterday when I looked for the specs on that NAPA filter what I wanted. Their website is not very user friendly. I buy all teh filters for  our three vehicles once or twice a year. Have always run NAPA Gold on everything I own....I buy it thru my Son's account for his business-which he has a Heavy Equipment repair shop-one reason he uses NAPA so much-they have such a full line of coverage for just about anything/anywhere- He gets s  good discount because of volume bought. Anyway-Thank you -Sir for your response.   glenn
    • It is possible to add your own 12v outlet to your truck.  Check out this video:   I verified via GM Upfitters that pin 31 is the same on the 1500 trucks.  The wire is GM part number 84779405.   You can get the GM 12v outlet from Amazon  https://www.amazon.com/Genuine-Accessory-Receptacle-25774623-13549530/dp/B0F1H9YRGF EWAY 12 Volt Power Adapter for GM   https://www.amazon.com/EWAY-Chevrolet-Silverado-Cigarette-Ignition/dp/B0915RRW6Q/ref=sr_1_1?   I just haven't figured out a good place to put the 12v outlet in my truck.   Some people are getting USB-C to 12V adapters  https://www.amazon.com/WYMECT-Cigarette-Lighter-Socket-Adapter/dp/B0F87WNQKB/ref=sr_1_1_sspa? Not sure if they provide the correct amperage that a device like a tire inflator would need.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...