Jump to content

It doesn't make any sense


Recommended Posts

Posted

Totally agreed on the rear vents. Absolute awful on GM part. Seriously. Genral morons. GM trucks are only one on the market without rear vents. Heck a work truck ford xl truck comes with vents. And don't give me floor vents garage.

Noticed in a recent magazine test they mentioned the GM trucks lack of rear amenities.

My buddy with his f150 has rear vents , cup holders in the back of the center console, heated rear seats and flat floor rear.

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

On really hot days, I use remote start to give the AC a head start. I have both of my girls 7&5 visiting me for a month, no complaints at all from them on it being to hot in the back and trust me, they complain about a lot of things.

Posted

I also live where it's HOT. And HUMID. And pretty much unrelenting.

 

Had a business luncheon today and my truck had a rear seat passenger. Remote started it, we all got in, set AC on high fan - we all welcomed that - and shortly enough I was able to turn the fan speed a couple notches.

 

I didn't like that the truck didn't have vents, but honestly it hasn't been an issue.

 

For heat, the standard under seat vents will work fine. I've not considered whether they work in cooling mode. But will investigate just because...

 

Not an issue.

Posted

Man after reading this thread I am really down about this not having rear vents thing. I have decided to just sell this thing. Who has 55k cash out there? I can no longer drive it without rear vents................... AND I am going to return the Deionized water unit that I ordered so that I could wash this rig without drying every time and not have water spots. I will find me a good bicycle and be happy, unless someone has an issue with the kind of bicycle that I choose? Then once again I will be completely devastated and be forced by the masses to assimilate and sell it LOL.

Posted

Totally agreed on the rear vents. Absolute awful on GM part. Seriously. Genral morons. GM trucks are only one on the market without rear vents. Heck a work truck ford xl truck comes with vents. And don't give me floor vents garage.

Noticed in a recent magazine test they mentioned the GM trucks lack of rear amenities.

My buddy with his f150 has rear vents , cup holders in the back of the center console, heated rear seats and flat floor rear.

I guess maybe I'm considered a "moron" for speaking the "garage". I believe the people responsible at GM are no less intelligent than those at Ford. Their trucks appeal to different tastes. I personally like both products but have preferred GM product designs for my past few pickup trucks.

Posted

 

  1. LED Headlamps---are these a little too bright? I've heard people say that the 2016+ LEDs are crazy bright and irritate oncoming traffic.

     

​Seriously? lol ... poor GM can't win... first the entire world bitc$es about the awful headlights in the 2014-2015 ... now they are too bright in the 2016? lol..

 

 

BTW.. I have the 2016 with LED's .. they are awesome.

 

Posted

 

  1. LED Headlamps---are these a little too bright? I've heard people say that the 2016+ LEDs are crazy bright and irritate oncoming traffic.

​Seriously? lol ... poor GM can't win... first the entire world bitc$es about the awful headlights in the 2014-2015 ... now they are too bright in the 2016? lol..

 

BTW.. I have the 2016 with LED's .. they are awesome.

 

 

 

Awesome! I am certainly hoping so.

 

I'm probably really overthinking this:-)

Posted

 

  1. LED Headlamps---are these a little too bright? I've heard people say that the 2016+ LEDs are crazy bright and irritate oncoming traffic.

​Seriously? lol ... poor GM can't win... first the entire world bitc$es about the awful headlights in the 2014-2015 ... now they are too bright in the 2016? lol..

 

BTW.. I have the 2016 with LED's .. they are awesome.

 

I agree -- the LED's on this 2016 SLT are great!

Posted

 

 

You obviously don't know how a big profit seeking corporation works. I am sure it is always convenient to blame "an engineer".

 

As an engineer myself (30 years of experience --- not in the auto, but in aerospace industry), just how many of the decisions you cite above do you actually think are at the hand of "an engineer"?????

 

Trust me, GM has very bright engineers that could provide the best rear seat vents in the industry. They also have bright engineers that could put two ventilated bucket seats on a small motorcycle and make them work flawlessly.

 

Somewhere in the management chain are decision makers that are looking at GM's production cost for a vehicle down to the $#%$ing penny.

...........

x2

The same engineers that design a Chevy could be easily interchanged with those who design a Maserati. Once it leaves the hands of engineers in R&D it gets pecked apart by production people who want changes to speed up assembly, management who wants to maximize investor payout, minimize payroll, utilize existing equipment and meet requirements of Federal regulations as cheap as possible, accountants who dictate expenditure limits, and worst - designers who get the final word caring more about appearance than function. The bottom line is bucks, and satisfaction is proportional to what you can afford and are willing to pay.

Posted

 

  • LED Headlamps---are these a little too bright? I've heard people say that the 2016+ LEDs are crazy bright and irritate oncoming traffic.
​Seriously? lol ... poor GM can't win... first the entire world bitc$es about the awful headlights in the 2014-2015 ... now they are too bright in the 2016? lol..

 

BTW.. I have the 2016 with LED's .. they are awesome.

Yeah they are awesome. Granted I've ticked quite a few people off with them when they think I'm high beaming them (this thing does light up interstate signs on low) until I show them my high beam then they leave me alone.

Posted

Love the led lights on my 16 , zero issues Witt that.

Posted

Yeah they are awesome. Granted I've ticked quite a few people off with them when they think I'm high beaming them (this thing does light up interstate signs on low) until I show them my high beam then they leave me alone.

 

The LEDs are bright no doubt, but I'm not lighting up interstate signs on low beam. The cutoff is a little low as-delivered IMO but if I have some weight in the back I dont want to blind people so I just leave it. I find using high beams on winding/hilly pitch black a necessity because of the sharp cutoff, same with most other cars/trucks with projectors/ factory HIDs I have owned. Honestly the lights on my old '15 Silverado (non projector) were better for the roads I drive, not as bright but a gradual and higher bleedoff of the beam was better for me.

 

Cant make everyone happy :)

Posted

 

The LEDs are bright no doubt, but I'm not lighting up interstate signs on low beam. The cutoff is a little low as-delivered IMO but if I have some weight in the back I dont want to blind people so I just leave it. I find using high beams on winding/hilly pitch black a necessity because of the sharp cutoff, same with most other cars/trucks with projectors/ factory HIDs I have owned. Honestly the lights on my old '15 Silverado (non projector) were better for the roads I drive, not as bright but a gradual and higher bleedoff of the beam was better for me.

 

Cant make everyone happy :)

Yeah when I'm on the interstate there is about a 1/4 of the bottom of the signs lit up on the side of the road. I've noticed the same around the new Escalade's with led headlights too. Mostly blue flicker than anything. My truck is stock. I think I may adjust them down 1 turn and see how that affects my vision if I continue to tick people off. I live in the boonies, and I can definitely see the deer better now which is nice.

Posted

I think headlamps are getting brighter and brighter. I think this is a good idea overall. But, it takes some adjusting for other people out there.

 

When mine comes in I'll take it out at night and check it out to see if they need to be dialed-down.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

 

 

You obviously don't know how a big profit seeking corporation works. I am sure it is always convenient to blame "an engineer".

 

As an engineer myself (30 years of experience --- not in the auto, but in aerospace industry), just how many of the decisions you cite above do you actually think are at the hand of "an engineer"?????

 

Trust me, GM has very bright engineers that could provide the best rear seat vents in the industry. They also have bright engineers that could put two ventilated bucket seats on a small motorcycle and make them work flawlessly.

 

Somewhere in the management chain are decision makers that are looking at GM's production cost for a vehicle down to the $#%$ing penny. I would bet a senior level accountant somewhere decided that adding rear vents in a truck would add $12 of production cost to the vehicle when factoring in the hundreds of thousands of units that are to be sold. Take $12 and multiply by x hundred thousand and you come up with the 0.5% increase in profits GM realizes by omitting them---all the mean time with the executives putting their arms in a in a sling patting themselves on the back.

 

As far as ventilated seats go , they cost (more) money too. I am almost certain that an accountant somewhere figured out that people realllly want those, but need to be "forced" to buy the "premium equipped" version (translation, the most profitable trim level) to get them.

 

I can not tell you how many times in my career I, myself, and others like me, have fought, pleaded and argued for the right TECHNICAL solution only to get shot down by a snot nosed so-called "business-leader" who decided that 0.1% more profit was more important than doing the technically correct thing.

 

Engineers are scientists, not business people. You got a technical problem, an engineer can tell you the best technical solution. It is not left up to the folks that know the most, technically, to bring that solution to market. Sad part is, it is often a clown with a business suit that has no clue how that product actually works, from a technical detail leve,l that makes that final decision.

 

Your points are well taken, but place the blame where it belongs. It's usually the engineers that are fighting for YOU, and the accountants that have the final say.

 

I'd like to know how many time the engineers there came up with the RIGHT solution, and an accountant comes back and says "find me 30% savings in your solution, or it's gone".

 

Sorry, your blame is mis-placed.

Don't fret over ventilated seats. When you use the front seat A/C ventilation, it blows hot air out the back seat. Seems like the only time we have passengers in the back is when it's 90+ degrees. Would love for an engineer to explain this...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,858
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    mark2
    Newest Member
    mark2
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 628 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • First of all sorry, I know there are a ton of transmission temperature threads...   My truck is a 2025 LZ0 High (10l89 10-speed) High Country with NHT max trailering package. The NHT package is supposed to have "enhanced cooling."   Normally the trans temp sits around 200. It seems like with any real stress it quickly jumps into the 220s (for example climbing a grade unloaded at lower speeds). I haven't towed much with this truck, but I'm concerned if it gets this hot unloaded.    I've tried a few different things to keep the temps down (tow/haul mode, sport mode, low range when that makes sense) and nothing seems to affect it.    I'm curious if others are the same behavior or if anyone has found techniques to keep the temps down. It seems like it just can't handle reduced airflow at lower speeds, even with relatively light loading.    Thanks!      
    • I'm at 105,000 miles on my baby Duramax. No issues yet. I hit 31 mpg's traveling through hilly terrain to a project in Colorado. I will buy another 3.0. I'm not concerned.
    • I'm glad you have 14,000 trouble free miles. Frankly though, that's a really low bar. A bare minimum of 80,000 trouble free miles as the norm (rare exceptions always exist) across the whole model year should be a starting point. Good maintenance habits should push these past the 100,000 mile mark with only the most minor of issues. Let's hope GM truly leveled up the quality game with these new engines and exploding engines under 50,000 miles are gone. 
    • This is exactly the reason our EV has consumed so much of my driving. I don't want to fire up a cold diesel or gas engine just to drive 2 miles up to the store. It's arguably terrible for an engine. If I'm not driving at least 10 miles and don't need to do truck things, the truck stays parked.   Enter the EV. It's immediately heating or cooling the cabin as needed (heat pump). An engine doesn't need to warm up or be driven gently. I can tear off in it with ZERO guilt. Move the car 1/4 mile from store to store and not think "gee, I'm short-cycling a lukewarm engine".   It doesn't idle in a drive-through. Doesn't idle at stop lights. (OK, neither would the diesel, if I let stop-start have its way, but I don't).   Even moving it out of the garage to wash it... HA! It doesn't need to be started just to move 40 feet. I have cars that I will actually put in neutral and push (no start) in/out of the garage or shop if they absolutely HAVE to be moved. My nice Camaros.
    • Some trailer plugs don't work. This one worked for me. Been using it for two years no issues. Amazon.com: Reese Trailer Plug Adapter, 7-Way Male Plug to 7-Way Female Plug, LED Lamp Out By-Pass, Plastic, Black, Each : Automotive
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...