Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Are the 4.3 inferior to the 5.3 or does it just depend on what you plan on doing with it? I always hear why get a truck with a v6 some say its a waste. I know the v6 has come a long way from what they used to output. Is the power output a big difference between the two?

Posted

For daily driving, you'd be fine with a V-6. If you want to drag race or tow, you'll definitely notice the lack of power.

 

Most people don't really need a V-8, they just like more power. Same reason I wanted the 3600 V-6 in my grand am instead of the I-4.

Posted

Yea don't plan on racing at all more of just the usual things people do with trucks is haul and tow stuff. Would the 4.3 be a good start?

Posted

If you want to go to home depot and buy 6 bags of mulch- no problem.

 

small fishing boat- no problem.

 

1000 lbs of junk in bed, or large trailer, you will have harder time getting up to speed on the freeway and taking off from stop, but if you rarely do this stuff, you can handle it once in a while.

Posted

I have the 4.3L. I am very pleased. I do wish that they could have tuned it for 300hp from the factory. I am running e85 for the extra boost in power. But I have to say, between pulling my friends boat out of the water into his trailer, was the most demanding thing I have done with it. I also pulled out bushes with the tow hooks. Worked like a champ. I couldn't justify spending the extra on the v8 per month for a truck I basically drive to the train station 5 days a week. It's amazing how expensive cars/ trucks have gotten. I have a 16 LT Allstar v6 and the sticker price is around $46,000.

 

01f5744fd2f4bdfb7d3ba7e40cfd280c.jpg

 

Granted it's not a huge boat but it worked great

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I love my 4.3 Ecotec3 and the six speed in it pushing my RCSB. Things got more grunt than any old school 302 I ever drove. Frugal when driven so. I don't tow and I don't carry anything in it I wouldn't put in the trunk of a Bentley. I literally treat it like a car with a really big trunk. That said I'll drive my fathers truck with the lesser power iron 4.3 and four speed auto and find it a capable hauler and tow rig. Single cars or light (8N size) tractors on the flat bed. That sort of thing. A load of compost. Single horse trailer is fine too. And we never go more than about 400 miles.

 

More than that would have me rethinking this I guess.

Edited by Grumpy Bear
Posted

Unlike the 6.2 you can get the 5.3 across all trim levels. If you could save a ton between the two engines I'd bite. But in my case on12-31-13 I drove my Texas package GMC out the door for 29K. I had a ton of 5.7s and 5.3s that were under 300HP so the six would have been fine. There wasn't any savings to do it. Funny I went there to by a 13 6.2 Denali they had 25 left, I left with the 14 Texas package and 20K.

  • Like 2
Posted

Camaro45

 

That's a good size boat being able to tow it. Just don't want to stress the truck out with more than it can handle. Since I just got it don't want it falling apart on me

Posted

Eh. People were towing boats like that with the old 255 HP or less 5.7L trucks of yesteryears. And now a V-6 does it even better. No big deal.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted

Camaro45

 

That's a good size boat being able to tow it. Just don't want to stress the truck out with more than it can handle. Since I just got it don't want it falling apart on me

Just as a reference point the boat is 21'. Would I plow with the truck, probably not. I wouldn't say the v8s are unnecessary because having more power is always better lol. If I used the truck more as a work truck or something to that effect, I would say your probably better off with the 5.3 at least there is no chance of disappointment lol.

Posted

My truck with a 4.3 is rated to pull up to a 7000 lb. load. I would trade for a 3/4 ton if I planned to regularly pull such a heavy load because the engine wouldn't be my biggest concern! The 4.3 is a powerful engine and provides all of the speed and strength most will require from a 1/2 ton. It is not "inferior" to the 5.3 or 6.2. The V8's produce higher HP and torque and are popular options. There are many options I would choose over an engine with extra power. However, I do appreciate the popularity of extra muscle under the hood!

  • Like 2
Posted

The 4.3L feels like a slug to me in anything bigger than a regular cab. Would have been a good engine for the Colorado though, I don't know why GM didn't use it in there.

Posted

The 4.3L feels like a slug to me in anything bigger than a regular cab. Would have been a good engine for the Colorado though, I don't know why GM didn't use it in there.

I'm not sure what a slug drives like however I assume you have compared a lot of vehicles to come to this conclusion. My current truck is a cc 4x4 std. bed with the 4.3. I find it to be very responsive based on the truck and power train combinations I have owned. Where do you notice the lack of power?

  • Like 1
Posted

I work at a dealer, I've driven every combination of Gm truck multiple times. I can always tell the v6s from the v8s just from driving them. The v6 just doesn't have the get up and go that the v8s have.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I'm tangentially aware of what Harley used to be, back in my riding days, although I was into Italian sport bikes. Ducati seems to have gone the other way; still very expensive, but they've made a large subset of their bikes a lot more reliable and accessible, and they've diversified their lineup to include other riding sports too. IMO, a good example of where greed and growth might have also been beneficial to the consumer.   Although GM is charging a relative premium for its most popular pickups, I find that there are some excellent value propositions in its lineup as well.   The Colorado still strikes me as the most attractive midsize on the market, and also the most reasonably priced given capability and features. There's a part of me that wishes I would have bought one instead of my Silverado.   The Equinox ...I must be getting old. The ICE equinox is a great design IMO. Probably because it reminds me visually of an actual SUV aka an S Blazer. Underneath it's nothing even remotely close, but it LOOKS good. It's got all the modern features plus some at a very reasonable price. If I had to run out and buy myself a daily commuter to do everything except tow, an Equinox would be on my list.   It does bug me that mid-tier 1500's reach into the 50-60k range, and Tahoes and Burbs are even more expensive. Less than 10 years ago, dealers were sitting on rows of Tahoe LS and LT's for low 40's. You could even still find Tahoes with a front bench, still!
    • Big oil is raking in billions from the Iran war. Can it avoid Trump’s fury?   Remember I said Big Oil is 'Vertically Integrated"?   Even as they no longer own the majority of the "Pump" they still own the "Well". Crude price upward pressure does not translate into that same pressure on production. Pumping cost remain unaffected and the gap is pure profit. Even after subtraction of a minor, comparatively, lower amount from supposed, but not always, realized refining volume. Consumers hate war, Big Oil, not so much.
    • We live in a world where the average person expects more. People say wages and our needs are farther apart. My first new home had 3 bedrooms and one bedroom. My first car and truck had what would be considered a stripped or work vehicle. In my neighborhood back then there were more homes like that and cars too. Middle managers and second home buyers worked their way up to the fancy houses and cars. Car loans were 3 years. GM had different models of cars for different income levels. The cars were pretty much the same size if you wanted a big vehicle. The nameplate designated the opulence. Chevy, Pontiac, Buick, Oldsmobile and Cadillac.  To be fair some of the cost is government mandated. We can’t blame them for giving us what people will pay for. Careful advertising steering people towards more profitable SUVs and trucks. As I learned recently a minivan is a cheaper more efficient form of transportation. Certainly easier to live with. Somebody realized the profit margin wasn’t as big and gave it a soccer mom label. So it lost its coolness. They’re making it the masses are buying it. You hit your hand with a hammer you can’t blame the hammer.
    • Hi All, I’m In need of advice regarding a scan result on my 2023 Silverado HD.  The Sensor Supply voltage relay states ON But…. the following 3 tests show Malfunction. Sensor supply voltage relay control circuit HIGH voltage Test status- Malfunction Sensor supply voltage relay control circuit LOW voltage Test status- Malfunction Sensor supply voltage relay control circuit OPEN test status - Malfunction. No DTC codes are stored. No DIC Lights. Remote Key Fob has been giving a few issues, namely Vehicle will not respond to an Open/Lock command from the key fob. New batteries installed to FOB made no difference, plus on one occasion recently the vehicle unlocked using the Fob, the vehicle started normally via the push button, then a random warning came up on the DIC stating the Remote Key was not found, all this while the key was located next to the central cup holders. Does anyone have any input or advice regarding this scenario? TIA 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...