Jump to content

Rancho or Bilstein?

dynoray

By dynoray
in Modifications & Accessories

Recommended Posts

dynoray Enthusiast

dynoray

Posted
Posted

looking for a shock upgrade for my 2015 2500 Hd 4WD gasser.   it has the white Ranchos from the factory. looking for some input on the better Ranchos or the Bilsteins.    or is there a thread already on this?    thanks

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2017SierraSLT Senior Enthusiast

2017SierraSLT

Posted
Posted

Aftermarket Ranchos are a decent shock. The one GM puts on the trucks at the factory are tarted up Tenneco shocks. The Bilsteins are an improvement.

SMiller Senior Enthusiast

SMiller

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, 2017SierraSLT said:

Aftermarket Ranchos are a decent shock. The one GM puts on the trucks at the factory are tarted up Tenneco shocks. The Bilsteins are an improvement.

No Rancho shock is worth installing, regardless of which series of shock it may be.

dynoray Enthusiast

dynoray

Posted
  • Author
Posted

ok,thanks for all the replies.   im also not crazy about the ranchos already rusting.   looks like crap.

dynoray Enthusiast

dynoray

Posted
  • Author
Posted
19 hours ago, 2017SierraSLT said:

Aftermarket Ranchos are a decent shock. The one GM puts on the trucks at the factory are tarted up Tenneco shocks. The Bilsteins are an improvement.

you mean the Rancho shocks that GM puts on are a cheap version?

4x4Pete Enthusiast

4x4Pete

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, dynoray said:

you mean the Rancho shocks that GM puts on are a cheap version?

Not necessarily 'cheap' just the lowest bid for GM's requirement.   People generally upgrade oem wear items with higher quality items that fit within their own requirements.  Shocks wear out and need replacement, might as well upgrade them.  Almost any 'quality' or brand name aftermarket shock will be better than the oem Ranchos.   

2017SierraSLT Senior Enthusiast

2017SierraSLT

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, dynoray said:

you mean the Rancho shocks that GM puts on are a cheap version?

Yes. The only resemblance they have is the white paint, decals, and the GM shocks fake red dust boots.

crankman Enthusiast

crankman

Posted
Posted

O good Ill be the odd ball today I still have the original Ranchos on my 2015 gasser HD. That truck rides smooth towing and unloaded guess I got a good set. Yea they got some rust on a few places. Who cares its a truck I use it as such. But I totally understand others wanting to upgrade and that is great , nothing wrong with that. Thats what makes the economy flow.  

SMiller Senior Enthusiast

SMiller

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, crankman said:

O good Ill be the odd ball today I still have the original Ranchos on my 2015 gasser HD. That truck rides smooth towing and unloaded guess I got a good set. Yea they got some rust on a few places. Who cares its a truck I use it as such. But I totally understand others wanting to upgrade and that is great , nothing wrong with that. Thats what makes the economy flow.  

I will bet you money that you have leaking shocks on your truck.

 

The shock upgrade for me is more of a safety aspect then ride, I have been in at least one situation where Bilstein shocks saved my ass, had to full abs brake while turning the jerking the wheel to avoid a accident, truck stayed planted, never nose dived or leaned, with factory shocks I would have lost rear braking and the traction of the left front tire.

 

While pulling a trailer they also make a huge difference.

 

If you get along with factory shocks then great but there is more to it then just wasting some money.

 

The Bilstein 5100's are great, if you are working the suspension more you can use a shock with a little more volume such as the Fox 2.0 or 5160's $$$.

SierraHD17 Senior Enthusiast

SierraHD17

Posted
Posted

Bilstein.... blah.  Two sets of 5100's and both sets had the rears leak in less than 15000 miles..... less than 5000 miles for the one set.  The higher mile set came from my pavement truck that doesn't tow or haul anything and you could play the one like an accordian... no charge left.   They must not like cold weather... or I apparently destroy them somehow ( that's the good one... must be by driving on highways) or whatever.... every forum has someone comment the same excuse lol.  If it was one set of shocks... well okay...bad set.... but 2 sets bought like 2 years apart.... pass. 

 

Buy anything but lol.  Thats my vote.

 

Or just buy Bilstein because differing opinions are not allowed lol.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...