Jump to content

5.3 Compression and fuel


Bowhunt24

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey all, I can't seem to reliably find the compression on my '14 5.3L. I'm trying to nail this down because I'm quite curious about the fuel debate. I know there are a lot of opinions out there regarding which octane you should use, if it's better for the engine, better for mileage, etc, etc. Well, opinions shouldn't matter here, right? Based on the compression of the motor we should be able to do some basic math and figure out if a higher octane is even being fully burned or not. 

 

Maybe I'm off here...but maybe I'm not! Weigh in!

 

-Evan

Posted

What do you mean by fully burned?

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Posted
34 minutes ago, m3n00b said:

What do you mean by fully burned?

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
 

Maybe not the best word usage, but essentially, if you're engine compression is low enough, the extra cost of high octane fuel is absolutely worthless. IF the compression is high enough, the engines could actually take advantage of the higher octane. I can't seem to find what the compression is on my 5.3. 

Posted

Ah, I think I found it. 11:1. 

 

GM 5.3 Liter V8 EcoTec3 L83 Engine

The L83 V8 engine is produced by General Motors for use in pickup trucks and SUVs. It is part of GM’s Gen V Small Bock engine design that’s known in trucks as EcoTec3, replacing the Vortec line.

Type: 5.3L V8
Displacement (cu in / cc): 325 / 5328
Bore & stroke (in / mm): 3.78 x 3.62 / 96 x 92
Block material: cast aluminum
Cylinder head material: cast aluminum
Valvetrain: overhead valve, two valves per cylinder, variable valve timing
Ignition system: coil near plug, platinum-tipped spark plugs, low-resistance spark plug wires
Fuel delivery: direct fuel injection with Active Fuel Management
Compression ratio: 11.0:1
Horsepower (hp / kW @ rpm): 355 / 250 @ 5600 (gas – SAE certified)
  380 / 283 @ 5600 (E85 – SAE certified)
Torque (lb-ft / Nm @ rpm): 383 / 519 @ 4100 (gas – SAE certified)
  416 / 564 @ 4100 (E85 – SAE certified)
Recommended fuel: regular unleaded or E85
Maximum engine speed (rpm): 5800
Emissions controls: close-coupled catalytic converter, Quick Sync 58X ignition, returnless fuel rail, fast-response O_ sensor
Estimated fuel economy (city / hwy): 16 / 23 (2WD)
  16 / 22 (4WD)



Read more: http://gmauthority.com/blog/gm/gm-engines/l83/#ixzz4xCguSAxt

Posted

It's not that simple many factors to consider. Cam profile, combustion chamber design, tuning, and also these engines are direct injection.

Run the same engine on a dyno with 87 and 91/93. Determine whether you are getting knock with 87 and if it is pulling timing resulting in a power loss. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, O_J_Simpson said:

To find the compression, pull a spark plug and attach the compression gauge to the spark plug hole. Turn the engine over...

He's referring to the compression ratio. Totally different measurements. 

Posted
6 hours ago, Bowhunt24 said:

Hey all, I can't seem to reliably find the compression on my '14 5.3L.

Do you have the Gen V L83 engine?  If so it is 11:1.

 

The Gen IV LC9 is 9.95:1 while the LMG is 9.6:1.

Posted
16 hours ago, swathdiver said:

Do you have the Gen V L83 engine?  If so it is 11:1.

 

The Gen IV LC9 is 9.95:1 while the LMG is 9.6:1.

I posted above, it's the L83 with 11:1. 

 

Doesn't seem like there is a right answer out there, mostly just preference on what octane people think is best to run for economy/perf. 

Posted

The higher the octane rating, the better your fuel economy will be.  There are plenty of people who disagree with that statement but I have proven it true in over thirty years of driving and testing with all manner of cars and trucks.  There's even a difference in performance between brands, even among top tier fuels which you'll have to work out on your own.  

 

Sunoco once offered the best performance for my vehicles but something changed and we get better mileage with our different vehicles using Mobil's 93 now.  Chevron is about equal to Mobil in our area as well.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I recall paying $5.00/gallon in 2007 as well, although, different circumstances. A severe windstorm followed by a rare ice storm knocked out power in our region for days. We had a gas generator keeping the fridge cold and our furnace on power, and fuel stations either didn't have power, or didn't have gas because deliveries were delayed because of the storms. Driving around, we found one station that didn't have power but had a sandwich board set up out front. $5.00/gallon. They were hand-pumping it out of the underground tanks. I'm not sure that was legal or even advisable, but we needed it, and they had it. So we filled up. I was just out of college, just bought our house. Times were tight so $5.00 felt really outrageous. Local supermarkets couldn't keep stuff cold so they were basically giving food away. Fridge/freezer cases were literally being emptied out before the food expired. Never seen anything like it before, and until this day this event serves as the boilerplate for our winter storm prep.
    • Have you spilt anything on the console during ownership?  Water, coffee, soda, juice, etc.?   GM has been seeing contaminated console shift controls causing all sorts of issues.  Requires replacing the shift control.
    • If it's something they cannot figure out they can contact GM. They have a case open for noise in the suspension and my whistling drivers mirror they cant figure out how to fix.
    • Thing is gorgeous! Definitely been a LONG time since I've heard that sound!      I wouldn't call myself a purist, since I'll throw Wilwoods and power adders on anything. For me, that engine makes me cringe as a former shop owner remembering all I've been through with some of them. Plus I hate LS engines for their oiling system (MANY places to lose pressure from, especially on the AFM ones which I wouldn't be caught dead with), and the dowel-less front and rear covers - an engineering decision that irks me to no end! And I despise electronics with every fiber of my being.   My main reason for avoiding modern electronics is that when they fail, they typically leave you stranded. Tied for 1st place is also the fact that sometimes troubleshooting super-annoying problems can suck the life right out of you. I've wasted so many hours of my life chasing gremlins on those in all kinds of vehicles. I find carburetors and simple HEI style components much more suitable for keeping my sanity, lol. Different strokes for different folks. I probably get more hate from the younger crowd for sticking with my old school ways of thinking than you would for doing an LS swap.   When everything's working, they're certainly a ton of fun! 
    • I have an Edge Insight CTS2 in my '04 3500, and find it works well.  Only real problem I have with it is the obdii connector will work itself free over time, so it stops working and also freaks out the trucks electronics for a bit.  Remove and plug it in and it's good to go.  More recently, I've taken to zip-tying it in place which also seems to work.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...