Jump to content

Trouble chasing lean codes.


Recommended Posts

Posted

If anyone knows of a previous thread that explains similar symptoms please let me know, I haven't been able to find any. 

 

I have been getting a CEL for p0171(lean bank one), p0405 (egr), p0449 (evap vent seloniod), and occasionally p0174 (lean bank two), and p0430 (cat system efficiency below threshold). It makes sense that all of these codes could come together so let me explain a little bit of what's going on. I bought the truck last fall with about 200k miles, and unfortunately had to have the trans rebuilt so I am trying to avoid throwing parts at it and hoping it fixes the issues.

 

When I bought the truck there was a code for the evap vent seloniod, which as far as I know would more than likely just make it so that the gasses can't excape when fueling and casuse me to have to hold the handle so I haven't been in a huge rush to replace that. There were exhaust manifold bolts broken in the block so I decided to put shorties on while everything was apart since they were relatively inexpensive, but these didn't have the port for egr and I bought the egr block. When swapping the manifolds, I found out the collector on my y pipe was cracked and plan to drop that down and weld it up when it gets warmer out. So I expect those two codes. 

 

As far as the cat efficiency being off, that has only came up a couple of times and I haven't quite gotten a chance to figure out anything that happens consistently before that. When it was real cold my truck would somewhat surge when stopping at stoplights. 

 

Now the bank one too lean code is the one that concerns me the most. For some reason the bank two lean isn't as common, and is usually just a pending fault and not a current fault like the bank one is. I thought maybe the lean codes could be from the known exhaust leak but that seems inconsistent with the bank having most trouble. 

 

Monitoring my fuel trims using torque pro I found that my long terms were pegged at 25 and the short terms were even higher. The short terms dropped when I revved the engine up to around 2500 and I could hear a slight Rev when spraying the intake with brake cleaner. This was on the passenger side, near where the egr was. It was close to the throttle body, and a new gasket was super cheap so I decided to clean the throttle body and clean the gasket which didn't do much if anything for me. Everything I came across looking at fuel trims led to vacuum leak, so I thought maybe the maf was bad so I tried a new one which didn't change anything either. I put the old one back in and removed the egr block flipped the o-ring around and that seemed to help for a day or so. 

 

But it came right back to where it was prior, so thinking it could also be a fuel issues I checked the pressure with a loaner from oriley's. Originally the key off pressure was up near 55 psi, the I turned the engine over and the pressure was around 45. After revving it was around that range still. I let the pressure off the tester and turned the key back on and this time the pressure was getting up to about 30 and then coming to about 25 after starting 

 

The gauge could have bad calibration, or I could have a fuel delivery issue. 

 

Anyways I have not noticed any misfires, nor have I gotten any misfire codes. My fuel trims remain high at idle (ltft 25%, stft from - 3% to around +10%), and lower when under load, especially if I'm actually driving. 

 

I was assuming that if it was a fuel issue I would see the fuel trim higher under load and more normal when idling? 

 

Any suggestions as to what else I could do to try to narrow this down and avoid taking it into the shop? Sorry for the wall of text, but I wanted to explain the best I could as this doesn't quite seem to be making sense.

 

 

Posted

It's hard to judge solely based on this snapshot really, but from what I gather, you have the most correction occurring at idle, but it comes down if you apply a bit more load on the engine.  How do the trims look while driving, as opposed to just revving in neutral?  If they are much closer to "normal" while you are moderately accelerating down the street, then that would really suggest to me that you have a vacuum leak as the primary cause of the lean codes.  It could be something with the evap system allowing air in since you have codes for that as well.  We've also seen a lot of vehicles with bad intake manifold gaskets as well as the occasionally broken vacuum port plug on the top passenger side of the intake manifold.

 

I'd start with testing it under load and then report back.

Posted

Hi Justin, 

 

Thank you for the response. The long term trims will drop down to around 15% and sometimes go a bit higher when driving, and the short term trims are around 0% under load, and will jump up when coasting in a situation such as coasting on the exit ramp from the freeway and I've seen it go as high as 30%. 

 

I was originally thinking vacuum leak, but then became confused with the fuel pressure test. I might go borrow another gauge to see if the first one had bad calibration. Would it be unheard of for a bad evap vent solenoid to cause a significant vacuum leak? I know if the solenoid is stuck open and the fumes from the canister are all cleared out, fresh air will be drawn through. Does anyone know a quick and dirty way to check if he vent solenoid is my issue? Could I just temporarily plug the purge solenoid and see what happens with the trim numbers? I plan to get it replaced eventually, but if possible I want to try to prove the source of my lean codes before replacing a bunch of stuff.

Posted

Yes, you could temporarily plug the purge solenoid to see if the trims drop down to a more reasonable point.

 

Short term trims will always average out to zero unless the long terms are completely maxed out.  They are useful in seeing very quick trends, but beyond that don't tell a whole lot, as the long terms will eat up any short term variance.

Posted

I will give that a try and report back what I come across. As far as an 18 year old pickup with 200k miles on it, would a reasonable ltft be around +/-10% or would +/-15% be more realistic as the engine is a little ways away from being brand new?

 

Posted

We encounter them very frequently that are in the +/- 3% range.  If you have high trims, there is a reason for it and it can be corrected.

Posted

The vapor purge valve is designed to
a) allow purge to atmosphere under high pressure (sitting in sun)
b) open to intake when the vehicle is at certain rpm conditions.
If the valve is stuck open, it could be providing vacuum leak symptoms.

Fuel pressure is correct. The pressure is regulated when the engine is running so it will drop from the dead run pressure

Also, had the same problem with 01 burb 5.3. Eventually, the problem degraded to hard start as well. Fixed it all with new iac and tps.

Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk

Posted
44 minutes ago, sefiroxx said:

Fuel pressure is correct. The pressure is regulated when the engine is running so it will drop from the dead run pressure

Also, had the same problem with 01 burb 5.3. Eventually, the problem degraded to hard start as well. Fixed it all with new iac and tps.
 

My code says that it is the vent valve that is having the evap error, but if I can either rule out or confirm that the evap is the issue I would be okay. 

 

As far as the fuel pressure everything I was reading was saying that the pressure should be up around 50-60. I had the pressure in spec (at least what I thought the spec was), but after revving the engine I was never able to obtain that, in fact is was more about half of that. 

Posted

Under full load the pressure should be right at 58psi, right around 48psi at idle.  If you're seeing less than that, then you're either dealing with a faulty FPR, a severely plugged fuel filter, a failing fuel pump or any comination of the three.  If you remove the vacuum hose to the FPR, a faulty unit will often have fuel visible.

Posted

Thanks again Justin, 

 

I'm planning on looking into things a bit more tomorrow since it's sleeting today. It's looking like I might have a combination of a vacuum leak and a fuel pressure issue. I have a fuel filter already ordered assuming that it hasn't been changed recently if ever. 

 

When under load on my way home today the ltft was around +15% and the stft was averaging about 0. Once letting off the gas and stopping the ltft maxed and the stft was a bit above +40%.

Posted

Well I got out another can of brake cleaner and am pretty certain that I have my issue narrowed down to an intake gasket leak. I was not able to hear the engine rev like I was expecting, but this time I paid extra attention to my scanner and I saw the trim numbers go way negative. I may still have a slight fuel pressure issue but I think my main problem is the gasket leak. 

 

Seems like a relatively straight forward repair but I am wondering if anyone has any recommendations or things that would have helped to know before getting into it. Also, is there anything else that might be nice to do with the intake manifold removed? 

 

Thanks a bunch!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Interesting, I suspect I would have fueled up in Lee Vining as the day prior I would have filled up either in Laughlin or near there and maybe again before I entered Death Valley and once out the other side late that evening as I kept on driving into the night up near Lee Vining. Next morning I most likely fueled up in LV before heading over Tioga Pass into ( as I refer to it as "Yose .... Mite" 😁 ). And again that was 19 years ago but the price then must not have jumped out at me like the 5 bill a gallon theme of nutty cult hippy country Big Sir or head so far up their rear Aspen. I'd be curious to know where the highest prices are in the lower 48, I probably would not be far off to guess somewhere in Cali forn ie. Coldfoot and Prudhoe bay may have those prices beat but that is a whole other world up there and when prices are more normal elsewhere that is about what they can be up there I believe in no mans land. Anyway interesting that the 395 corridor is hosing people and the thing is, its tourist season and its not like there are a lot of competition options when driving up that highway from what I could see. Yup, big ole Boaterhomes and various other RV's ahead and behind me at the Yosemite entrance gate and they have to get their fuel somewhere.  
    • Those can be high, as well as the big California cities. The ones that will pop your eyes out are the 395 corridor on the Eastern side of the Sierra Nevadas. Lee Vining, $7.19 for regular and $8.89 for diesel is what the Google said right now.
    • Correct.  2019-2021 model years are serviced by a different p/n.  19420611.  Recall 2021s use 19420611.   The recall engines 2022-2024 model years are serviced with 12740076.     The difference between 19420611 and 12740076 is GM changed injector size for 2022.  The injectors are smaller on 12740076 with smaller injector bores in the cylinder heads to match the smaller injectors.  So you can't install a 19420611 in a 2022-2024, and you can't install a 12740076 in a 2019-2021.     Both engines are the replacement engine p/ns that are in the L87 recall.  So both of these are the updated engines.     Here's a version of the L87 recall with the p/ns for all the parts needed.    RCRIT-25V274-7075.pdf   Note it shows 19420611 and 12740076 with an asterisk to a footnote "Use the VIN and the GM Electronic Parts Catalog (EPC) to determine which part to order if two or more part numbers are listed for the same part, as it may vary by vehicle options."    
    • Looking for advice from this group. Took my flawless 2020 6.2 TB to an unnamed shop for routine rear brakes and oil change. Tech forgot to put oil back in after the full service and needles to say, destroyed my engine.  It’s all on their shop video so they are responsible.   I had my Chevy dealer do the analysis and they confirmed its compromised and said engine replacement. The manager said they only get GM reman engines from GM with full 3 yr warranty and the one they would put in is not same as what’s they are swapping out on 21-25 for recall.    I am looking for advice why that would be a different engine because obviously I had the good 6.2 year and replacing it has my concerns with that recall for 21-15   Also what’s the pros and cons of accepting the engine swap vs telling the shop that bricked the truck to pay up so I buy a new truck. I’m concerned about stigma resale eventually if I just decide to get rid of it after the swap or other issues showing up after the swap out.  
    • Just looked up my records.  I've never gone over 5000 miles between oil changes.  At 46K miles, I have 10 oil changes.  I hope that will help.  I also installed the disabler last year.  I've still had a few times when it didn't seem to engage (which I can tell because the start stop feature kicks in), but for the most part, I think it's working.  For some reason, GM did not include the number of cylinders running in the information screen like I had on other models.  In my Cadillac, it shows me when it's running on 4 cylinders on the fuel milage screen.  I can't find that on my '21 Denali.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...