Jump to content

Just talked to 2019 Sierra Owner


Recommended Posts

Posted

yes they are.

Not a fan of the Dodge front end either.  The F150 is already ugly.  and I'd never get a Crapota or a Nissan, so what does that leave me?  I'll get me an older GMC/Chevy. 

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
9 hours ago, the_swd said:

I'm guessing this is the same truck. Spotted this at Oakland University a few weeks ago.

image.thumb.png.64cf134d9068610e0b4d6c44dba0f231.png

Wow, that looks great.  I'm thinking Silverado this round.   

Posted
10 hours ago, the_swd said:

I'm guessing this is the same truck. Spotted this at Oakland University a few weeks ago.

image.thumb.png.64cf134d9068610e0b4d6c44dba0f231.png

 

Is that a bunch of salt still seeping out the cracks in the parking lot??

 

OU sure has added a crap load of parking.  I graduated from there in 2014.

Posted
At the boat launch. 6.2 SLT red looked real sharp. Guy works for GM.
 
Guy says 10spd is way smoother and agreed with me that the 8spd kinda sucks.
 
Frame is wax.
 
Says engine is very smooth with the new cylinder deactivation.
 
 
Sorry if we already knew this stuff.
 
 
Ok time to get on my Spark and enjoy the day!!


Of course he’s going to say positive things about it, he works for GM. I met a GM guy in 2014 and just swore up and down how much better the newly redesigned 14 was far more superior than any previous, BS! All redesigned systems require Guinea Pigs to workout all the kinks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
9 hours ago, TXGREEK said:

 


Of course he’s going to say positive things about it, he works for GM. I met a GM guy in 2014 and just swore up and down how much better the newly redesigned 14 was far more superior than any previous, BS! All redesigned systems require Guinea Pigs to workout all the kinks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

that's very true, we should take what he said with a grain of salt ya know.  At least we can be sure of the frames being wax.  That was my main thing I wanted to know, as far as I could recall that was an unknown to us.

Posted
11 hours ago, TXGREEK said:

 


Of course he’s going to say positive things about it, he works for GM. I met a GM guy in 2014 and just swore up and down how much better the newly redesigned 14 was far more superior than any previous, BS! All redesigned systems require Guinea Pigs to workout all the kinks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

:uhoh: So you think the 07-13 is a superior truck to the current 14+? :lol:

 

Tyler

Posted
:uhoh: So you think the 07-13 is a superior truck to the current 14+? [emoji1]   Tyler

 

 

 No, I didn’t say that. My experience with the new 2014 LTZ Crewcab 4X4 Z71 was that it was the biggest pc of [emoji90] I’ve ever bought and driven. The rear end was replaced, transmission. I even put new bilsteins on it to improve the ride, new Michelin’s and left out the motor even while being fed supreme lagged performance 50% of the time and the guys at my dealership even went so far to report it as “serious lag in performance issues”. I buy new trucks every 2 years, keep the one I love. My loaded out 16 DMax was great but couldn’t always find diesel so I special ordered my new 18 GMC 6.2 loaded out and because knock on wood it’s had ZERO issues so looks like I may just be keeping this one especially since the new ones coming out have literally similar HP and Torque. But yes, “MY 2014” was garbage!

 

All work I did to it in order to help with ride quality was within 1 1/2 yrs.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted

Is it me or does the running board extend a little more giving access to bed ? 

Posted
Is it me or does the running board extend a little more giving access to bed ? 


You’re correct, they move backwards with a tap to the rear of them in order for you to step up and retrieve things from up front. LMAO ? [emoji23] [emoji38]! I think it’s to help those who can’t lean over the side of the bed and trying to find more ways to fit everyone’s needs. I just hop up on the tires and graphics what I need but again I’m sure we all thought of the side steps imbedded in the rear bumper the same way and I love them


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
2 minutes ago, TXGREEK said:

 


You’re correct, they move backwards with a tap to the rear of them in order for you to step up and retrieve things from up front. LMAO ? emoji23.pngemoji38.png! I think it’s to help those who can’t lean over the side of the bed and trying to find more ways to fit everyone’s needs. I just hop up on the tires and graphics what I need but again I’m sure we all thought of the side steps imbedded in the rear bumper the same way and I love them


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I meant just a longer running board. Not the ones you described which are bad ass btw

the current gm twins running boards stop right at the back of cab instead of going a little more down the dodge has them currently 

Posted

Personally, I like both of the new designs. I am sure they will grow on us, as the K2 designs have.

The Grilles/Front end of Both Sierra and Silverado look like they mean business. Very bold and aggressive looking.

Especially the Silverado.

The Small thin Led Headlights are mean looking.

Posted
Personally, I like both of the new designs. I am sure they will grow on us, as the K2 designs have.
The Grilles/Front end of Both Sierra and Silverado look like they mean business. Very bold and aggressive looking.
Especially the Silverado.
The Small thin Led Headlights are mean looking.


Well said.

I agree.

When new designs are released a lot of people hate it but after a few years of seeing them on the road it usually grows on people and suddenly the people that hated it end up buying one.

Of course there are exceptions to that but I didn’t care for the k2xx in 2014 and Now I own a 2018!
Posted

I also think the trucks will get their new 5.3 and 6.2 after next year when the new suvs come out. By the way anyone see the new irs on the new full size gm suv coming out next year ? Finally! 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,866
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Greg3160
    Newest Member
    Greg3160
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 557 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Late reply, but yes—it works on the SLT trim. Compatibility comes down to the plastic shroud shape behind your mirror, not the trim badge itself. On the SLT with auto-dimming, it uses a plug-and-play Y-harness off the mirror/rain sensor power, so no need to run wires down to the OBD port. If anyone's ever unsure about fitment, just drop a photo of your mirror housing and we can double-check it.   Appreciate the detailed feedback on the install! On the windshield glare—we actually took feedback like yours and developed a dedicated CPL (polarizer) filter to cut down dash reflections on sunny days. If you're still running the cam, shoot me a DM. I'd be happy to send a CPL filter over for you to test out—no charge. 
    • There are no stickers in your glovebox?
    • Look at the numbers on the stickers in the door jam...
    • Yes, every time the developer updates his code, you must recompile. I will private message you with the latest because it changes pretty much with every version.
    • After I wrote that reply I went for a ride. 85 F out. So trans started at 85 F and it shifted the same as it did an hour latter at 168 F. I've never actually recorded the to cold to shift point but it is under 32 F before they start hanging on to a lower gear or leaving the converter unlocked. Both intended to heat fluid.    Yes, brake or bake. Absolutely.      Your welcome. True research ended decades ago. Field trials are still in play.    There is a thing called oxidation onset temperature. This is the heat related oxidation not the O2 exposure kind. For mineral oil that starts at 140 F. So what happens after 140 F? Each 20 F cuts fluid life in half! Does using a Full Synthetic improve that? Yes! By how much? Depends on the base oil type and a few other factors. But enough to notice. Some esters are even higher. There are even synergies between types the will raise it higher than any one component is alone.    Then there is "Hindered" oils. Antioxidant additives. Hindered Polyol Esters can sit at 500 F for years in a turbine.   When a blender brags his oil will 'take 500 F" in service he doesn't specify for how long. Water will dance on a 500 F hot plate for several seconds. @newdude put up a chart showing the relationship between fluid temperature and it's life in an automatic transmission. Here's a version of that chart for Group III based oils. These temperatures are those in the pan as observed as 'normal'. that is you drive as you do for as long as you do under what load you ask of it and whatever that temperature is this graph applies to. Flash temperatures of a few minutes isn't what his means.    Note that fluids held at a constant 240 F have a service life of only 20K miles. 220 F explains the factory exchange limit, eh? My equipment I keep under 180 F and I'm good if the cooler will hold it as low as 140 F. But that's me.   
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...