Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
BORA is the brand name of quality bolt on adapters:
http://www.motorsport-tech.com/special/truck/chevy_s
 
I personally wouldn't use the Rough County brand spacers, they're lug centric, not hubcentric.  I would go with a set specifically designed for our trucks.  I think I paid $50 for my pair, which isn't cheap, but I had no vibration or balancing issues. 
Mine are from RC, 2" spacers. No issues either. Have had them installed for nearly 2 years now.33fa05020c3f6707bdbe86e02b3c0309.jpg619d5f070c5ff54ddf2c09d5f50790a0.jpg

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Posted
5 minutes ago, btj_z71 said:

Mine are from RC, 2" spacers. No issues either. Have had them installed for nearly 2 years now.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
 

I meant the RC slip on spacers, not the bolt on adapters.

Posted
On 10/19/2018 at 9:13 AM, pewterliftedz said:

If you have the factory Snowflake wheels, you can run a 1" BORA adapter type spacer, and not have to trim your studs.  Personally I wouldn't go bigger than a 1/4" with slip on spacers, you want to make sure you're getting plenty of thread engagement. 

Only a 1” spacer?  I would have guessed at least 1 1/4” or 1 1/2” would be needed. I have the factory 20” Denali Wheel which is different that the regular Snowflake wheel.  I also haven’t taken the time yet to remove a wheel and check the depth of the holes in the back.

Posted
2 hours ago, steve76t said:

Only a 1” spacer?  I would have guessed at least 1 1/4” or 1 1/2” would be needed. I have the factory 20” Denali Wheel which is different that the regular Snowflake wheel.  I also haven’t taken the time yet to remove a wheel and check the depth of the holes in the back.

IDK about other wheels, but the snowflake have enough relief to run a 1" adapter. 

Posted
On 10/19/2018 at 11:09 AM, pewterliftedz said:

I ran a 1/4" spacer on the front of my truck when I ran factory wheels with 305s, and it helped eliminate a lot of the rub.  With a 285 or 295 I'm sure that 1/4" would get rid of all the rub.  They're nice custom hubcentric pieces, I don't need them anymore since I went aftermarket wheels and control arms, let me know if someone is interested.

spacers.JPG

I would be!  Do they still allow the oem wheel to sit on a hub ring? Or studs only?

Posted
On 10/23/2018 at 5:23 AM, Yondu said:

I would be!  Do they still allow the oem wheel to sit on a hub ring? Or studs only?

Yup, the wheel remains hubcentric with the 1/4" spacer.  Message me if you're serious, and we can set something up.

Posted (edited)
On 10/19/2018 at 9:13 AM, pewterliftedz said:

If you have the factory Snowflake wheels, you can run a 1" BORA adapter type spacer, and not have to trim your studs.  Personally I wouldn't go bigger than a 1/4" with slip on spacers, you want to make sure you're getting plenty of thread engagement. 

For the record, I removed a wheel & measured the depth of the cavities in the back of my 20” Denali wheels...  a 1” spacer wouldn’t work for me.  The studs are 1 3/4” long & the depth of the cavity is only 1 5/8”.  A 1” spacer would be at least 1/8” short of what’s needed to work.  Here’s a pic of what the back of my wheels look like...   I decided to go with 1 1/4” spacers & they’re exactly what I was looking for.  

C2D4E4BE-D7D5-4DB0-A10E-8F56FEE89CF7.jpeg

Edited by steve76t
Posted (edited)

Pulled the trigger on some 1 1/4” spacers for my truck.  Install took about 1.5 hours as I was taking my time, did test fitting at each wheel, made sure everything was clean, then made sure all were installed correctly.  Here’s a pic of how she looks...

 

3E2E244F-2B1E-4F19-B5BE-2D753DA43346.jpeg

Edited by steve76t
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Here’s pic down the side from front

7F936FEC-E137-4795-A90C-33430E91E2D3.jpeg

Edited by steve76t
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

And one more down the side from the rear...

7495349C-0737-4FA3-BA90-BA1705C1836C.jpeg

Edited by steve76t
  • Like 1
Posted

I have a little experience with slip on spacers as well as thicker bolt on spacers with studs.  I ran several different sizes and styles of slip on spacers on my Camaro.  I had some cheap cast spacers for a while.  They suck.  They do not hold torque well at all.  The billet machined spacers are much better and are more stable.  Just make sure you still have enough thread engagement, minimum is 1.5 x stud diameter.  If you are short of this, ARP makes some nice longer studs.

 

Same goes for the bolt on spacers, billet machined are way better than cast.   Make sure they have quality studs and nuts.

 

"Flame suit on". I have found zero difference in performance between hub and lug centric spacers.  Not in drivability, steering shake, perceived wheel shake or bearing life.  The way I see it, the lugs MUST help center the wheel anyway with tapered (acorn) lug nuts other wise tightening them down would try to split the wheel if one or more were off center.  I think hub centric is nothing more than an assembly aid to help the lugs center up on the assembly line to speed things up.  "Flame suit off". Just my opinion.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, steve76t said:

For the record, I removed a wheel & measured the depth of the cavities in the back of my 20” Denali wheels...  a 1” spacer wouldn’t work for me.  The studs are 1 3/4” long & the depth of the cavity is only 1 5/8”.  A 1” spacer would be at least 1/8” short of what’s needed to work.  Here’s a pic of what the back of my wheels look like...   I decided to go with 1 1/4” spacers & they’re exactly what I was looking for.  

C2D4E4BE-D7D5-4DB0-A10E-8F56FEE89CF7.jpeg

Are your tires stock 275/55r20 size?

 

With a 1" spacer you need 3/4" deep pockets, correct?  I'll have to measure my wheels.  I kind of like not destroying my feet ders with rock chips though...hmmmm

Posted (edited)

No, slightly bigger with 285/55r20 which are about 3/4” taller & 1/2” wider than 275/55r20’s.  On the truck my BFGs are nearly an inch taller than the stock Goodyear SRAs it came with.  

 

With a 1” spacer, yes you’d need a wheel with 3/4” deep pockets or more.  The other option would be to trim the end of the stud some.  There is room to do that as there’s about 1/2” of stud length that’s not threaded or used.  

Edited by steve76t

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Replace the fuel pump with an OEM AC-Delco.
    • Hello, first time posting here. I have an 03 Chevy 1500HD with the 6 liter gas engine. The truck ran fine until the fuel pump died on me and had to get it towed. Replaced the fuel pump with a precision pump from O’rileys and changed the fuel filter while I was there. The truck will run and drive now but it wants to idle around 500 rpm when in drive and it tries to stall if you touch the gas. It drives fine though, just doesn’t want to idle. Put a fuel pressure gauge on the rail and only have 50 psi. I guess these trucks should have 55-62 psi to run right. I thought the regulator might be the issue because when I would unplug the vacuum hose it jumped to 56 psi. Replaced the regulator and no change. The only thing I can think of is that I was sold a faulty fuel pump. Any help would be appreciated because I’d rather not have to take the bed off again if I don’t have too. Thank you!
    • I've been wrenching on GM trucks for 17 years. And I need to get something off my chest because it's been weighing on me for a long time. After all that time, all those motors, all those people standing in my bay, I've figured out there are really only two kinds of owners. The ones who already know about this. And the ones who are about to find out the hard way. A guy came into my shop a few weeks back in a 2018 Silverado 5.3. Sharp guy, maybe 35. Knew his truck cold. He'd been on the forums, read the threads, done his homework. He only rolled in so I could double-check a little module he'd already plugged in himself. Wanted a second set of eyes on it. Ten minutes, in and out, drove off happy. Two days later, a completely different story walked through the same door. Older fella this time, in a 2016 Sierra. Gorgeous truck, clearly babied, not a scratch on it. Wedding ring. Looked like a guy who took care of his stuff. He was in because his engine had started knocking on the way to work. And by the time I got the valve cover off, I already knew it was too late. Lifter collapsed. Cylinder 5. Camshaft chewed up. The whole top end shot. Same kind of truck. Same motor. Same roads, probably the same dealer. The only thing separating those two men was information. I've been at this since 2008, and I've worked on everything GM puts out. Silverados. Sierras. Tahoes. Yukons. Suburbans. Escalades. The 5.3 and the 6.2. Doesn't matter which badge is on the tailgate. They all carry the same problem. So here's the information one of those guys had and the other one didn't. It's called Active Fuel Management. AFM. GM started building it into their V6s and V8s back in 2007 to squeeze out a little better mileage on the highway. Maybe a mile or two a gallon. All to hit government fuel economy numbers. The way it works, the motor quietly shuts down half its cylinders when you're just cruising along. And the little lifters that pull that off have a tiny pin inside them that's constantly clicking in and out. Lock, unlock, lock, unlock. Hundreds of times a drive. Thousands of times a week. Eventually one of those pins wears through. The lifter drops. And it starts grinding the camshaft down like a chisel on butter. And what nobody tells you is that the shudder you feel around 40 or 50 mph? That's the system cycling. Every single time. Here's what really gets me. The pre-2007 trucks, the ones without AFM, they're bulletproof. I've got customers still daily driving them with 260,000 miles on the odometer. Not a problem in the world. GM took a perfectly good motor that would have lasted a lifetime and bolted this system onto it. And it is wrecking engines that should have run forever. The guys who hang around the forums already know all of this. So do the techs. They handled this years ago. They didn't sit around waiting for the dealership to mail them a warning letter, because that letter is never coming. It's the guys who figured somebody would've told them who end up on my lift. And I want to be clear, because this part matters. Maintenance has nothing to do with it. I've torn down motors with barely 30,000 miles on the clock. I pulled apart a Tahoe last summer with 24,000 on it. Practically a brand new truck. Owner had it less than a year. Spotless oil. Best synthetic money can buy, changed early every time. Made no difference. I've seen guys with full dealer records, every interval stamped. Made no difference. The oil changes were never the problem. The pin was. And no amount of babying that truck stops that pin from cycling every single time you drive. That's the part that eats at me. These are good motors. Take the AFM out of the equation and a 5.3 or a 6.2 will run 300,000 miles and never blink. So a few years ago I started telling every single owner who comes through my doors the exact same thing the smart guys already knew. Get yourself a FullForce disabler. It plugs right into the port under your dash. Couple of seconds and you're done. It just tells the computer to leave every cylinder running, full time. No more cycling. No more beating those lifters back and forth every time you turn the key. It doesn't reprogram anything. Doesn't touch your tune. And unplug it before a dealer visit and there's absolutely zero trace it was ever installed. I've had customers come back at 40,000, 60,000, 80,000 miles after I put one in. Zero issues. The trucks run smoother. And the lifters aren't getting beaten to death every single drive. I won't sit here and tell you it's magic. A lifter that's already damaged is a lifter that's already damaged, and this won't un-ring that bell. But it takes away the one thing causing all that wear in the first place. That's the whole game. You don't need a five-thousand-dollar delete. You don't need an expensive tune. You don't need to tear anything apart. You just need to stop the cycling. I'm not writing this for any company. I'm writing it because I'm tired of watching the guys who didn't know pay four and five figures for it. I'm tired of being the guy who has to break the news. I'm tired of knowing that the guys who did know fixed the whole thing for the price of a tank of gas, and the only difference was that somebody told them first. If you drive a Silverado, Sierra, Tahoe, Yukon, Suburban, or Escalade from 2007 or newer with a V6 or V8, you've got AFM. You've got those lifters, and they're cycling every single time you drive. So be the guy who already knew. Not the one I'm scraping metal out of next month. EDIT: A bunch of folks asked, so here it is. The one I put my faith in is FullForce. This is where to find it: https://www.tryfullforce.com/products/fullforce™-afm-dfm-disabler They back it with a 60-day guarantee too. I've handed out more than I can count and not one's ever come back to me. Not one. See less
    • Thanks for following along. I'm not author material, my tenses are all over the place and an editor would have a heck of a time cleaning up after me. Reading and writing is still a fun pastime though.   My new scanner came in yesterday, wow, where the heck has this thing been?! It connects right up to the Blazer, there's all kinds of bidirectional tests like EGR activation and percentage, toggle the fuel pump relay, EVAP purge valve, IAC control, AC relay, reset the transmission's adaptive learning, toggle shift solenoids and TCC lockup, and I can reset fuel trims with the click of a button...all things I could have used over the last 60 days!   It's also telling me there is a stored code in the ABS module for front left wheel sensor open and something about the brake switch. The ABS dash light works. It illuminates normally during the self-test at key on/ start and that's it. I cleared the codes and will see if they set when I take it out later. That, and I'm going to get (hopefully) real data on timing and cam ******. The PID's are there.   I connected the tool to my truck...holy smokes. Newer vehicles make early OBDII vehicles look like 8-bit, pixelated, early Nintendo stuff. This? This is like wearing 3D virtual reality goggles playing one of those elaborate, cinematic video games with seasons and plots in comparison. There are SO MANY modules and SO MANY tests and SO MUCH data. There's a scanner sequence for filling the coolant...   End of the day, it's a tool with way more power than I need, but the versatility to do old and new is there (and I need an adapter to connect it to my OBDI Camaro). It will allow me to do the first pass of diagnosis when out-of-warranty vehicles need help, and it will enable more DIY maintenance like brake system bleeding, ABS bleed, etc. I probably over-bought here, but, mission is accomplished.   Enjoy your Sunday...I need to shut this machine down and go get ready for the week ahead.
    • Not that I've read, after all the issues they've had in the past I'm pretty sure they learned their lesson. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...