Jump to content

T1 6.2 letdown?


Recommended Posts

Posted

My 15 5.3 6speed ccsb LTZ could beat a crew ram and I also could beat my brothers 5.7 biggest cab Tundra.   Unless the new Rams are a lot quicker for some reason that video just doesn’t make sense.  I think even magazine tests had equivalent 5.3 Silverados and 5.7 Rams running super close with the Silverado being a tad quicker.   If nobody would have said the GMC had a 6.2 I would have assumed it had a 5.3.  I’ve driven a new 5.3 Silverado 8 speed and it seemed quicker than my 15 5.3 did, not much but definitely a tad quicker.  

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
My 15 5.3 6speed ccsb LTZ could beat a crew ram and I also could beat my brothers 5.7 biggest cab Tundra.   Unless the new Rams are a lot quicker for some reason that video just doesn’t make sense.  I think even magazine tests had equivalent 5.3 Silverados and 5.7 Rams running super close with the Silverado being a tad quicker.   If nobody would have said the GMC had a 6.2 I would have assumed it had a 5.3.  I’ve driven a new 5.3 Silverado 8 speed and it seemed quicker than my 15 5.3 did, not much but definitely a tad quicker.  

Just between you and me. I’ve outrun a few 6.2s and Rams with my 14 GMC 5.3 on E-85 and a hypertec caned tune. My two brothers and nephew have Rams. A couple of friends have Denalis, my son had a Denali SUV. Keep it between us, ok. Gearing, weight and tuning play a big roll.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
41 minutes ago, KARNUT said:


Just between you and me. I’ve outrun a few 6.2s and Rams with my 14 GMC 5.3 on E-85 and a hypertec caned tune. My two brothers and nephew have Rams. A couple of friends have Denalis, my son had a Denali SUV. Keep it between us, ok. Gearing, weight and tuning play a big roll.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I’m calling you out.   Lol.  

Posted
I’m calling you out.   Lol.  

That was two rides ago, I get bored easy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

I know I will probably miss my 2016 w/ 6.2 - tune/intake ... that thing shifts perfect and will melt the tires.  But I'm getting old, don't tow anything and tired of feeding the 6.2 premium gas... so back to 5.3 in 2019. 

Posted
I know I will probably miss my 2016 w/ 6.2 - tune/intake ... that thing shifts perfect and will melt the tires.  But I'm getting old, don't tow anything and tired of feeding the 6.2 premium gas... so back to 5.3 in 2019. 

Can you tune it to run on reg gas? When I did a job for a company in 07 they supplied a gas card. It would only allowed reg gas. At the time I was driving a Trailblazer ss, which recommended premium gas. I ran reg gas for 30K miles that summer. It didn’t harm it. I did keep my foot out of it, that was hard but I did it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
4 minutes ago, KARNUT said:


Can you tune it to run on reg gas? When I did a job for a company in 07 they supplied a gas card. It would only allowed reg gas. At the time I was driving a Trailblazer ss, which recommended premium gas. I ran reg gas for 30K miles that summer. It didn’t harm it. I did keep my foot out of it, that was hard but I did it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

As long as the knock sensors are doing their job, you can run an L86 on 87 octane. I wouldnt advise it, but you certainly can

 The ECU should pull timing accordingly and you will be way down on power.

Posted
As long as the knock sensors are doing their job, you can run an L86 on 87 octane. I wouldnt advise it, but you certainly can
 The ECU should pull timing accordingly and you will be way down on power.

GM should tune them to be able to run on all gas available. I remember a friend who had a turbo mustang in the 80s. It had a switch on the dash for reg gas or premium gas. The power difference was noticeable.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

What a bunch of whiny bitches. Have any of you speculators actually driven a T1 6.2? Or even a K2 6.2 for that matter? I feel like the comments are all coming from the GMT 800 crowd.

Posted

Makes sense to me. 2014 6.2 (6 spd) 0-60 is 5.4. 2015+ 6.2 (8spd) 0-60 is 5.7. 19's with the 10 spd will be skipping gears? Takes longer to make the shift.

 

*edit*

 

It takes some time for the 6.2 to wake up. I think gm built something into the tuning.

Posted
1 hour ago, lt1z said:

What a bunch of whiny bitches. Have any of you speculators actually driven a T1 6.2? Or even a K2 6.2 for that matter? I feel like the comments are all coming from the GMT 800 crowd.

Is that you Matt?

Posted
2 hours ago, GMC-AT said:

I know I will probably miss my 2016 w/ 6.2 - tune/intake ... that thing shifts perfect and will melt the tires.  But I'm getting old, don't tow anything and tired of feeding the 6.2 premium gas... so back to 5.3 in 2019. 

I am curious to the difference between my 2010 6.2 and 2019 6.2.  I am trying to stay away from driving one but I may go soon.......  My son told my wife today that I am getting a new truck in 5 months.  I have never set a timeline other than maybe next year.  Want a TrailBoss with 6.2 but thats not an option (yet).  Not fully sold on an AT4 looks wise.  

Posted

I got my Sierra AT4 2 days ago and the 6.2 is certainly impressing me so far. I had a 2015 Silverado 6.2 w/the (terrible) 8 speed. This truck feels like a beast 

Posted
12 minutes ago, lt1z said:

 


Yep lol

 

It’s me John, SLOWHITE from TBSSOwners.  You sold me your MIT intake tube.  So you got a new truck huh?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.3k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,732
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    user087
    Newest Member
    user087
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 716 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Here's a starter kit:    CC Jensen, a Danish oil testing Concern gives us the following guidelines:   ISO 14/12/10 Very Clean Oil ISO 16/14/11 Clean Oil ISO 17/15/12 Lightly Contaminated ISO 19/17/14 New Oil ISO 22/20/17 Very Contaminated and not suitable for any service.   In addition CC Jensen gives a table showing how engine life is increased by cleaning up the oil. For example cleaning the oil from 19/17/14 to 13/11/8 will extend motor life by a factor of 6X.   But even cleaning it two “Life Extension Classes” will double motor life. So perhaps giving those classes would be useful:   21/19/16 20/18/15 19/17/14 18/16/13 17/15/12 16/14/11 15/13/10 14/12/9 13/11/8   *************************************   https://testoil.com/program-management/setting-iso-cleanliness-targets/   Third paragraph from the bottom will give a starting point.    Your next question should be, okay 10um at what Beta ratio and the answer is in the graph Beta 75.   Then the next question is what is your chosen filters profile? (Purolator PL series below) The red dot is Beta 75. This was the information I obtained from MANN a few years ago. So the best filters, Purolator One, AMSOIL EA, FRAM Ultra, Royal Purple, Bosch Premium should get a doubling engine life over filters like Purolator L, any service filter from any quick lube, WIX, NAPA, STP, Mobil 1, Purolator BOSS.    And as noted by CC Jensen a 2-5 micron @ Beta 200 bypass system has the capability of a six fold improvement. AMSOIL has such a system as does Donaldson.       Now having said all that testing is the touchstone. Test the oil NEW and test it with your chosen filter. Then test over milage. Do the work, get the result. But understand this in NOT absolute BECAUSE this is one factor in isolation.   Example:    A valve spring supplier can state that with cam X and a valve train of Y grams the valves will not float to 7K rpm. is that true if the builder choose a system 20 grams over limit? Common sense must be used and limits understood. 
    • This doesn't look like a GM truck. Not needed on a HD truck
    • It varies a ton around me. Some places are still at $5.00 or higher and others are way down into the $4's.   Offroad diesel was $4.02 at the one station I passed today.
    • So after reading the reveal from Chevrolet, I kept asking myself...why did the trim levels change?   Here are the official ones:   Work Truck (WT): The quintessential fleet truck, built with durable, easy-to-clean interiors for commercial or utilitarian use. Custom: A stylish, road-oriented trim that adds a more refined appearance, standard dual exhaust, and modern exterior styling. Custom Trail Boss: An entry-level off-roader featuring a 2-inch factory suspension lift and 34-inch mud-terrain tires on a budget. Silverado: Serving as the new base consumer truck (replacing the previous LT trim), it comes standard with the Z71 off-road package when equipped with 4WD. Trail Boss: Steps up the off-road hardware with the 2-inch lift, 34-inch tires, monotube shocks, an exclusive off-road hood, and more premium interior options. ZR2: The flagship off-roader. It boasts 35-inch mud-terrain tires, Multimatic DSSV dampers, front and rear electronic lockers, forged carbon-fiber interior accents, and an available hardcore Bison Edition (co-developed with AEV). High Country: The pinnacle of luxury. It replaces bright chrome with modern satin chrome, 22-inch wheels, premium leather, real wood interior trim, a panoramic sunroof, and an exclusive front-passenger touchscreen. As others have stated, why would you want a Silverado - 'Silverado' - wth?? LT needs to remain!!!   Also, there will no longer be a dedicated Z71 model.  All 4x4 trucks will have the Z71 package. Carplay is also something that cannot be removed.  Hopefully it will remain.     I am excited about the 5.7L V8 (350 C.I.D.)  Old school Chevy power.  My only concern is whatever version of AFM/DFM cylinder deactivation.  Too bad that isn't an option a buyer can choose to have or not.   I will definitely be stopping by my local dealership when these trucks start showing up.
    • I haven't seen diesel for less than $5.30 anywhere in my area
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...